![]() |
|
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1221709)
Care to quote where the TA guarantees that, 76?
It is a good agreement. |
Originally Posted by Waves
(Post 1221711)
I just spoke with my neighbor who is a very senior Captain with SkyWest. They are concerned with the results of this TA that some of their flying will now be going away. Especially with the 717’s coming. He spoke with some of his higher ups and they didn’t have many encouraging words to say about their future. BTW: Wow their sure are some sore losers here.
|
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1221902)
Time for you to grow up and read the agreement instead of listening to all the propaganda.
It is a good agreement. |
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1221907)
t, the union people even agreed that it doesn't guarantee growth.
This is a good agreement. |
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1221909)
NO contract is going to. The donuts won't even try that ludicrous statement. It recaptures DCI flying... period. We will be flying more of that time when all is said and done. Period.
This is a good agreement. I guess you're just wanting to bicker with the off topic argument you're trying to bring in. DCI will shrink by around 1200 pilots as a result of this**, and I'll get 1200 more bucks next month. I'm on board with this agreement whether I wanted it or not, and I'm going to make the best of it. I will certainly not make it out to be something that it is not, though. **pending delivery of 717s or A319's |
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1221909)
NO contract is going to. The donuts won't even try that ludicrous statement. It recaptures DCI flying... period. We will be flying more of that time when all is said and done. Period.
This is a good agreement. look in the contract and not a nnp. |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1221924)
it does not require that we recapture dci flying. period. we do not have to increase our fleet and/or our block hours. as long as they shrink, they are in compliance.
look in the contract and not a nnp. |
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1221914)
The quote I was responding to was a guy touting how great this agreement is and that it guarantees growth for mainline. It does not and I was correcting that statement.
I guess you're just wanting to bicker with the off topic argument you're trying to bring in. DCI will shrink by around 1200 pilots as a result of this**, and I'll get 1200 more bucks next month. I'm on board with this agreement whether I wanted it or not, and I'm going to make the best of it. I will certainly not make it out to be something that it is not, though. **pending delivery of 717s or A319's |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1221884)
Significant increase in 76 seaters without having to grow mainline as PWA required. Getting to keep 70 70-seaters the PWA would not have allowed per the number of 76 seaters added.
|
Good to have you back tsquare.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:29 AM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands