Details on Delta TA
09-05-2014, 01:31 AM
#1512
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Originally Posted by Purple Drank
I just realized that the DALPA operatives here have already dropped all pretense of obtaining a "home run" contract.
All of their posts here have been about why we must provide concessions--making the company's case, arguing why we need to grant relief. None of the DALPA operatives are even attempting to rally us towards massive improvements.
Why do we put up with this?
All of their posts here have been about why we must provide concessions--making the company's case, arguing why we need to grant relief. None of the DALPA operatives are even attempting to rally us towards massive improvements.
Why do we put up with this?
The new official talking point is no 2004 rates date of signing.
Same DALPA stuff, different DALPA day.
These guys would think we need concessions if Delta made a $1 trillion dollar profit.
09-05-2014, 02:27 AM
#1513
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,299
Originally Posted by gzsg
The new official talking point is no 2004 rates date of signing.
Same DALPA stuff, different DALPA day.
These guys would think we need concessions if Delta made a $1 trillion dollar profit.
Same DALPA stuff, different DALPA day.
These guys would think we need concessions if Delta made a $1 trillion dollar profit.
09-05-2014, 04:38 AM
#1514
Straight QOL, homie
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Posts: 4,202
Originally Posted by Oberon
What are you talking about? .
09-05-2014, 04:46 AM
#1515
The Brown Dot +1
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: 777B
Posts: 7,775
Originally Posted by Purple Drank
Please provide an example of a Dalpa operative here building trust, finding common ground, and rallying us to achieve massive gains--why isn't "restoration" our opener?--in what could be the best negotiating environment we'll ever see. One example of leadership. Just one will do.
I can easily be a single issue voter...if there are concessions, I'll vote no.
09-05-2014, 05:57 AM
#1516
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Position: Lowest Pay I Could Find
Posts: 1,044
Originally Posted by scambo1
I see what you are saying. There are a group which are often referred to as DALPA operatives who seem to take the anti-argument whenever there's a post from someone who they probably label as a (defunct alternate representation attempt) operative...even to the detriment of any gain or constructive conversation about possible gains.
I can easily be a single issue voter...if there are concessions, I'll vote no.
I can easily be a single issue voter...if there are concessions, I'll vote no.
I would honestly be happy with a wide smattering of small improvements. But not willing to deal with any concessions. Before anyone says "it's negotiations", I get that. This is the most favorable negotiating environment I am likely to see in my lifetime. If ALPA can't hit this slow-pitch softball, we are F'd.
Please don't make anything like sick leave or profit sharing worse.
09-05-2014, 08:10 AM
#1517
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 757/767
Posts: 588
Originally Posted by Purple Drank
Please provide an example of a Dalpa operative here building trust, finding common ground, and rallying us to achieve massive gains--why isn't "restoration" our opener?--in what could be the best negotiating environment we'll ever see. One example of leadership. Just one will do.
Can you provide an example of a "DALPA operative" posting about "why we must provide concessions"? You made a claim, back it up.
09-05-2014, 10:16 AM
#1519
No longer cares
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Originally Posted by gzsg
The new official talking point is no 2004 rates date of signing.
.
.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
