Details on Delta TA
#2081
I don't think I need to be an expert on the contract to opine that saying "restoration" isn't a useful tactic, strategy, or whatever those espousing it choose to call it. I have been through a section 6 negotiation recently and frequently spoke with the negotiators and reps. The name of the game is maintaining an appearance of negotiating in good faith.
I took the actual number of days I flew last year. I figure on the MD-88/90 the average number of legs per day is 3. The MD-88 holds 149 PAX and the MD-90 holds 160. Our loads are pretty full most of the time, so I used 145 as the average passenger load.
Then, I looked at my December 31 pay stub. I added Flight Pay, Flight Advance, Profit Sharing, Shared Rewards, and company contributions into my retirement accounts... basically total compensation for the year.
Then I divided that number by the number of passengers I carried. My total cost to Delta per passenger? $2.98.
So... obviously it's more than just me up there. And some airplanes have higher paid Captains and more than two pilots. So let's say for illustration purposes that the average cockpit cost per passenger is $7. To increase our W2's to the same level of buying power we had during most of the 1980's, 1990's, and early 2000's, we would need approximately a 50% increase. Using $7 as our average cockpit cost per passenger, that's an additional $3.50 Delta would need to net per passenger. Delta invented $25 bag fees out of thin air and has no trouble collecting them. I have no doubt that they could find a way to net (whether through revenue increases or cost cuts in other areas or some combination) $3.50 more per passenger if they needed to. Where there's a will there's a way. Our management proves this every single day. They are very good at thinking outside the box.
So, is "restoration" reasonable? Would we be negotiating "in good faith?" Clearly, I think so. I think there is a strong case to be made for that. Trouble is, nobody is making that case on our behalf.
#2082
I agree that it would put much more of my pay at risk, but I'm willing to take that risk if it gets me back to C2K plus inflation whenever Delta is making the kind of profits it made leading up to C2K.
That said, I've not thoroughly run the numbers on this. Are you saying that with C2K profit margins, which is where we are apparently projected to be this year with a $4B PTIX, tripling our anticipated profit sharing won't get us full restoration?
That said, I've not thoroughly run the numbers on this. Are you saying that with C2K profit margins, which is where we are apparently projected to be this year with a $4B PTIX, tripling our anticipated profit sharing won't get us full restoration?
#2083
Oberon-
You're a noob (nothing wrong with that... we've all been there), and if you've been paying attention and know the contract history you'd have some valid input. Yet you've openly admitted that you don't know nor understand what has been going on with our contracts and negotiations all while preaching like you know it all. Then on top of that, you say you don't even know who your reps are. Really?
Might want to tone it down a bit. Your credibility is absolutely shot at this point. A little more listening and a lot less know-it-all preaching is in order.
You're a noob (nothing wrong with that... we've all been there), and if you've been paying attention and know the contract history you'd have some valid input. Yet you've openly admitted that you don't know nor understand what has been going on with our contracts and negotiations all while preaching like you know it all. Then on top of that, you say you don't even know who your reps are. Really?
Might want to tone it down a bit. Your credibility is absolutely shot at this point. A little more listening and a lot less know-it-all preaching is in order.
#2084
Neither do half the ones on here that are screaming for it either, Timbo.
Sailed with Matt yesterday.. You should come out with us sometime and do some real sailing. Rum and everything at the finish.
#2085
- Prior to BK, they agreed to a 12% targeted DC plan in return for a soft freeze on our A plan.
- In BK, they agreed to a $2.1B stock grant upon exiting BK in return for the overall concessions we took, both before and in BK.
- In BK, they agreed to a $650 cash payment if our frozen A plan was terminated.
- In BK, they agreed to the profit sharing plan we have today (minus the 5% we gave up in C2012).
- In BK, they agreed to annual pay increases beginning January 1, 2007.
#2086
Wouldn't that plus some kind of hourly pay increase, more vacation, etc., at least get us close?
#2088
That is true, however I kinda disagree. I'm an '07 hire which means I haven't lost anything in the BK. However, I came here (from another major btw) with the expectation that at some point we could be back to pre BK wages. So while I may not have a "dog" in the fight, that doesn't mean I shouldn't want restoration. Hope that made sense.
#2089
Delta invented $25 bag fees out of thin air and has no trouble collecting them. I have no doubt that they could find a way to net (whether through revenue increases or cost cuts in other areas or some combination) $3.50 more per passenger if they needed to. Where there's a will there's a way. Our management proves this every single day. They are very good at thinking outside the box.
So, is "restoration" reasonable? Would we be negotiating "in good faith?" Clearly, I think so. I think there is a strong case to be made for that. Trouble is, nobody is making that case on our behalf.

Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



