Notices

Details on Delta TA

Old 10-16-2014 | 08:04 PM
  #2881  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Timbo
I think having no profit sharing would be a HUGE mistake, for two reasons:

1. Profits going forward are going to be huge, now that there are only 3 Major US Carriers, and little or no undercutting of each other. Reduced competition PLUS the falling price of fuel will guarantee big profits...at least until the next 'economic downturn'.

2. Profit Sharing is a GREAT motivator to get employees to work harder. With profit sharing they are 'vested' in the operation and when it comes down to doing a good job, or just punching out and going home, they will try just a little bit harder. And, it is right that they should share in the success they created.
Interesting today in the earnings call RA backed off on reducing profit sharing. He said our incentives are obviously working because our performance is so strong. Hope that is the case.

We need to preserve profit sharing and get a historic increase of our hourly rates.
Reply
Old 10-16-2014 | 08:11 PM
  #2882  
Timbo's Avatar
Runs with scissors
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 7,847
Likes: 0
From: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Default

Originally Posted by gzsg
Interesting today in the earnings call RA backed off on reducing profit sharing. He said our incentives are obviously working because our performance is so strong. Hope that is the case.

We need to preserve profit sharing and get a historic increase of our hourly rates.
I'm a reasonable guy. I'll split it with the stock holders, after my pay/retirement is restored to pre bankruptcy rates.

If Delta makes $4Billion, I think the employees should get $2 Billion of that. You KNOW the other $2 Billion is going to share holders.
Reply
Old 10-17-2014 | 08:14 AM
  #2883  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Timbo
Pay raise vs. profit sharing...

The CEO club always wants to pitch it as an 'either-or' proposition.

Chose one.

But it doesn't have to be a choice.

You can have BOTH.

Employees SHOULD have BOTH!
At this point in time I agree. But what about the next downturn? DAL has to weather the next economic downturn and produce profits in order to be considered a "good transportation company" and not just an "airline". That is the goal. But what if they are not successful? I will say that at this point in time I like profit sharing and that it shouldn't really be on the table in C15. However... when things turn south, we might not be so hasty to put it into the untouchable category. The interesting thing is that when that downturn DOES occur, management will be more than willing to keep or even raise it.
Reply
Old 10-17-2014 | 09:32 AM
  #2884  
TenYearsGone's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,039
Likes: 0
From: 7ERB
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
At this point in time I agree. But what about the next downturn? DAL has to weather the next economic downturn and produce profits in order to be considered a "good transportation company" and not just an "airline". That is the goal. But what if they are not successful? I will say that at this point in time I like profit sharing and that it shouldn't really be on the table in C15. However... when things turn south, we might not be so hasty to put it into the untouchable category. The interesting thing is that when that downturn DOES occur, management will be more than willing to keep or even raise it.
And that is why I despise 4833. C12 should have netted us more. Anyone who thinks this current trajectory in profits is going to continue is "High". Also, with the upcoming downturn (I dont know when), we will be sought after to take pay-cuts and contract relief. We are about one contract too late, in my opinion.

TEN
Reply
Old 10-17-2014 | 09:43 AM
  #2885  
TeddyKGB's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,673
Likes: 0
From: 7er
Default

Originally Posted by Timbo
I think having no profit sharing would be a HUGE mistake, for two reasons:

1. Profits going forward are going to be huge, now that there are only 3 Major US Carriers, and little or no undercutting of each other. Reduced competition PLUS the falling price of fuel will guarantee big profits...at least until the next 'economic downturn'.

2. Profit Sharing is a GREAT motivator to get employees to work harder. With profit sharing they are 'vested' in the operation and when it comes down to doing a good job, or just punching out and going home, they will try just a little bit harder. And, it is right that they should share in the success they created.
We are not in a good economy. Haven't been in one since Bush took office.
Reply
Old 10-17-2014 | 01:08 PM
  #2886  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by TenYearsGone
And that is why I despise 4833. C12 should have netted us more. Anyone who thinks this current trajectory in profits is going to continue is "High". Also, with the upcoming downturn (I dont know when), we will be sought after to take pay-cuts and contract relief. We are about one contract too late, in my opinion.

TEN
We will come around to 'Go' anytime now. C12 was an OK contract. Not great, but it didn't suck. We didn't have then, and still don't have much to pattern off of to get better rates. If Jerry is right, and APA is gonna get 5% over ours... how on God's green earth do you or anybody else think we are gonna get your vaunted "restoration"? SOmebody has to raise the bar, significantly n order for us to do that. "Me too" clauses don't do **** to help us achieve our objective.
Reply
Old 10-17-2014 | 01:10 PM
  #2887  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Delta1067
We are not in a good economy. Haven't been in one since Bush took office.
And have accelerated downward since he left.
Reply
Old 10-17-2014 | 03:33 PM
  #2888  
DAL 88 Driver's Avatar
At home on the maddog!
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,874
Likes: 0
From: Retired (mandatory age 65)
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
how on God's green earth do you or anybody else think we are gonna get your vaunted "restoration"? SOmebody has to raise the bar, significantly n order for us to do that. "
We've been in a leadership position in this industry for quite some time. Just a thought ... but how about WE raise the bar more than slightly better than BK+COLA?

I know it's a lot and it won't be easy. But if not us, then who? Do you really think if we wait for somebody else to do it, that it's ever going to happen? We've set the tone and provided the leadership for this profession for the past decade. And the tone we've set and the leadership we've provided says that we don't ever expect to restore the buying power of our compensation. It says we've accepted bankruptcy as a reset and only expect "reasonable" improvements to that new baseline.

You can't have it both ways, T. Either your goal is restoration... which means you have to put on your big boy pants and not be afraid to say it. Or you're goal is something far short of that. It seems clear which way you lean. You want to pay lip service to restoration every now and then, but then every argument you make is counter to it. Might as well just go ahead and wave that white flag (while wearing your life preserver in case somebody else rocks the boat).
Reply
Old 10-17-2014 | 03:50 PM
  #2889  
TeddyKGB's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,673
Likes: 0
From: 7er
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
And have accelerated downward since he left.
I'm no Obama fan or cheerleader but our economy is doing much better today than it was the day he took office. You can't say the same thing for GWB. We were in very deep recession the day Bush left office. Some economists even say we were borderline depression. Go ahead spin away
Reply
Old 10-17-2014 | 04:58 PM
  #2890  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Timbo
Pay raise vs. profit sharing...

The CEO club always wants to pitch it as an 'either-or' proposition.

Chose one.

But it doesn't have to be a choice.

You can have BOTH.

Employees SHOULD have BOTH!

First off, you need a 3% raise every year, just to keep up with inflation.

Second off...WHO took a huge pay cut to save Delta and American and United?

WHO?

Yeah, the EMPLOYEES!

THAT is why they should always share in the wealth their sacrifices produced.

AND they should have raises, above a cost of living increase, to recover from the pay cuts.

Of course nobody in the CEO club will see it that way. They are paid with stock options. They would rather give that money to the share holders, to run the stock price up, so in effect, they can transfer your sacrifices to their pockets.
This right here ladies and gentlemen.

Carl
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kilroy
ExpressJet
10796
01-11-2016 06:49 AM
FastDEW
Major
201
09-03-2011 06:42 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
ksatflyer
Hangar Talk
10
08-20-2008 09:14 PM
INAV8OR
Mergers and Acquisitions
66
05-15-2008 04:37 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices