Details on Delta TA
#3221
Straight QOL, homie
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,202
Likes: 1
From: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Isn't he the guy who leveraged his ALPA "service" into a six figure fee to consult on the ual merger?
He is the most arrogant, condescending ALPA poster here. And that's saying something.
He is the most arrogant, condescending ALPA poster here. And that's saying something.
#3222
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 0
RH is now head of the Strategic Planning Committee.
He has 10 yes votes on the MEC.
MY OPINION
He now has complete 100% control.
He has zero regard for the survey. He thinks line pilots are ignorant and slow. They can never understand the big business he and Richard do.
He will "monetize" and "take risk off the table" by reducing profit sharing.
Again MY OPINION ONLY
I hope to be wrong. I know rich could get us a "historic" C2015 IF he wanted to. Unfortunately he is being played with a pat on the head from RA. Think junior exec.
He has 10 yes votes on the MEC.
MY OPINION
He now has complete 100% control.
He has zero regard for the survey. He thinks line pilots are ignorant and slow. They can never understand the big business he and Richard do.
He will "monetize" and "take risk off the table" by reducing profit sharing.
Again MY OPINION ONLY
I hope to be wrong. I know rich could get us a "historic" C2015 IF he wanted to. Unfortunately he is being played with a pat on the head from RA. Think junior exec.
I have had a conversation with him before during C2012, and in no way did I feel he was talking down to the group, or disrespecting the intellect of the group. I obviously can't speak about his feelings on the survey, but I think both you and I agreed that the survey was poor.
Bottom line: I think he's 100% on our team, and I'm glad he's there. He's maybe not the crazy mofo who's going to force RA to go to 100% of what we want after a couple years of bluffing, but if he was a negotiator, I'm guessing he'd get us 95%, with a minimum of fuss, and no weird givebacks. Maybe there isn't a crazy mofo out there that will force RA to that mythical place anyway, because RA can play defense just the same as he can try for a consensual deal early. So, if we're comparing real guys who have gotten a very solid job done, vs. guys who have not gotten a mythical, pie-in-the-sky deal done (in their minds), I'll take RH.
In either case, he's not our negotiator.
With all that being said, respect doesn't mean acceptance. If he (hypothetically) thought we need to monetize the PS, I'd disagree with him.
#3223
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Likes: 0
Interesting. I forgot he was the head of the committee you were referring to. He's actually a guy I have a lot of respect for. He's a good combination of having enough intellect and enough guts. I know he's not liked by some N pilots because they felt he was too effective in the SLI, but if it helps, many S pilots think he was too conciliatory.
I have had a conversation with him before during C2012, and in no way did I feel he was talking down to the group, or disrespecting the intellect of the group. I obviously can't speak about his feelings on the survey, but I think both you and I agreed that the survey was poor.
Bottom line: I think he's 100% on our team, and I'm glad he's there. He's maybe not the crazy mofo who's going to force RA to go to 100% of what we want after a couple years of bluffing, but if he was a negotiator, I'm guessing he'd get us 95%, with a minimum of fuss, and no weird givebacks. Maybe there isn't a crazy mofo out there that will force RA to that mythical place anyway, because RA can play defense just the same as he can try for a consensual deal early. So, if we're comparing real guys who have gotten a very solid job done, vs. guys who have not gotten a mythical, pie-in-the-sky deal done (in their minds), I'll take RH.
In either case, he's not our negotiator.
With all that being said, respect doesn't mean acceptance. If he (hypothetically) thought we need to monetize the PS, I'd disagree with him.
I have had a conversation with him before during C2012, and in no way did I feel he was talking down to the group, or disrespecting the intellect of the group. I obviously can't speak about his feelings on the survey, but I think both you and I agreed that the survey was poor.
Bottom line: I think he's 100% on our team, and I'm glad he's there. He's maybe not the crazy mofo who's going to force RA to go to 100% of what we want after a couple years of bluffing, but if he was a negotiator, I'm guessing he'd get us 95%, with a minimum of fuss, and no weird givebacks. Maybe there isn't a crazy mofo out there that will force RA to that mythical place anyway, because RA can play defense just the same as he can try for a consensual deal early. So, if we're comparing real guys who have gotten a very solid job done, vs. guys who have not gotten a mythical, pie-in-the-sky deal done (in their minds), I'll take RH.
In either case, he's not our negotiator.
With all that being said, respect doesn't mean acceptance. If he (hypothetically) thought we need to monetize the PS, I'd disagree with him.
#3225
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Likes: 0
Imagine saying to a neighbor, coworker, shareholder, stockholder, etc.
Delta is making billions and billions in record profits. Our annual fuel expense just dropper over $7 BILLION DOLLARS.
Our position is that we should make in hourly rates what the Delta pilots made in 2004 plus a little for inflation.
Do you think that is reasonable?
Yet, we will fail. Count on it. Our execs compensation is up over 700% since chapter 11 and we won't come close to a decade ago.
Does that make sense?
Delta is making billions and billions in record profits. Our annual fuel expense just dropper over $7 BILLION DOLLARS.
Our position is that we should make in hourly rates what the Delta pilots made in 2004 plus a little for inflation.
Do you think that is reasonable?
Yet, we will fail. Count on it. Our execs compensation is up over 700% since chapter 11 and we won't come close to a decade ago.
Does that make sense?
#3226
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,877
Likes: 194
Imagine saying to a neighbor, coworker, shareholder, stockholder, etc.
Delta is making billions and billions in record profits. Our annual fuel expense just dropper over $7 BILLION DOLLARS.
Our position is that we should make in hourly rates what the Delta pilots made in 2004 plus a little for inflation.
Do you think that is reasonable?
Yet, we will fail. Count on it. Our execs compensation is up over 700% since chapter 11 and we won't come close to a decade ago.
Does that make sense?
Delta is making billions and billions in record profits. Our annual fuel expense just dropper over $7 BILLION DOLLARS.
Our position is that we should make in hourly rates what the Delta pilots made in 2004 plus a little for inflation.
Do you think that is reasonable?
Yet, we will fail. Count on it. Our execs compensation is up over 700% since chapter 11 and we won't come close to a decade ago.
Does that make sense?
Edit: the fuel bill for the last complete year in 2013.was about 8.8 billion. Looks like it will be about 10.8 billion for 2014.
#3227
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,877
Likes: 194
??? "probably less" ??? Its less by an order of magnitude.
We still have never seen a number for how much Delta saved by terminating the pilot pensions.
Now there's something that I would trade profit sharing for. All the money we lost when they took our pensions.
We still have never seen a number for how much Delta saved by terminating the pilot pensions.
Now there's something that I would trade profit sharing for. All the money we lost when they took our pensions.
#3228
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,877
Likes: 194
And he did a incredible job for the Delta pilots in the SLI and UAL feels the same!
#3229
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 634
Likes: 0
From: Airbus
AA pay rate graphs/valuations are out. We will still lag you guys if we don't have profit sharing. Voting currently open until Jan 30. We are hoping for a no vote to use the leverage we have and get more.
The rates are based on Delta +7% for 2015 but of course when DAL profit sharing is factored in it's more like Delta - 13%
Info here:
http://www.airlinepilotforums.com/am...ta-graphs.html
The rates are based on Delta +7% for 2015 but of course when DAL profit sharing is factored in it's more like Delta - 13%
Info here:
http://www.airlinepilotforums.com/am...ta-graphs.html
#3230
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Likes: 0
There is no excuse for not hitting the 2004 rates plus date of signing. The insiders are putting out that will never happen.
Hoping the MEC does their job and is not manipulated by these individuals.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



