Notices

Details on Delta TA

Old 05-07-2015 | 09:19 AM
  #3961  
Purple Drank's Avatar
Straight QOL, homie
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,202
Likes: 1
From: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Default

C12 rumors were met with the same abhorrence. But the MEC passed it. And so did 62%.
Gotta contact our reps.
Reply
Old 05-07-2015 | 09:29 AM
  #3962  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 5,146
Likes: 112
Default

Originally Posted by ERflyer
Not my post but this is what's on chitchat: The rumor du jour:

"-- Pay on a three year deal would look like ... 9%DOS, 6% on 1/1/16, 4%, 4% ...

-- Profit sharing concession would look like this ... will go from (10% below 2.5B and 20% above 2.5B) to (10% below 4.5B and 20% above 4.5B).

-- Credit on vacation and training would stay same but "pay hours" would go up ... (possibly keep vacation credit/week at 22:45 but pay as high as 35 hrs/week) ... expect the same type of deal for CQ.

-- retirement would get 1%-2% bump to stay in line with UAL and AA

-- Also considering a base stipend between $1000 and $500/month depending on where you live ... to cover parking and cost of living expenses. (example .. $1000 for NYC and $500 for ATL)

-- We did not have time to discuss sick time or pay banding or training freezes ... (not sure my buddy asked for that info)

-- My buddy got the impression that DALPA is/was "onboard" with these numbers ... So if you disagree, you better bend some reps ears!"


I'd vote No on that. We'd be paying for most of our own "raise".
Would actually be funny if it wasn't so sad.
Reply
Old 05-07-2015 | 09:55 AM
  #3963  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
From: 5-9 block, kill removing
Default

Originally Posted by ERflyer
Not my post but this is what's on chitchat: The rumor du jour:

"-- Pay on a three year deal would look like ... 9%DOS, 6% on 1/1/16, 4%, 4% ...

-- Profit sharing concession would look like this ... will go from (10% below 2.5B and 20% above 2.5B) to (10% below 4.5B and 20% above 4.5B).

-- Credit on vacation and training would stay same but "pay hours" would go up ... (possibly keep vacation credit/week at 22:45 but pay as high as 35 hrs/week) ... expect the same type of deal for CQ.

-- retirement would get 1%-2% bump to stay in line with UAL and AA

-- Also considering a base stipend between $1000 and $500/month depending on where you live ... to cover parking and cost of living expenses. (example .. $1000 for NYC and $500 for ATL)

-- We did not have time to discuss sick time or pay banding or training freezes ... (not sure my buddy asked for that info)

-- My buddy got the impression that DALPA is/was "onboard" with these numbers ... So if you disagree, you better bend some reps ears!"


I'd vote No on that. We'd be paying for most of our own "raise".
I'd vote yes with just the smallest tweak.

Add 3 to each of those annual numbers, delete the profit sharing paragraph, make vacation and training 5:15/day and I'm in.
Reply
Old 05-07-2015 | 10:08 AM
  #3964  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ERflyer
Not my post but this is what's on chitchat: The rumor du jour:

"-- Pay on a three year deal would look like ... 9%DOS, 6% on 1/1/16, 4%, 4% ...

-- Profit sharing concession would look like this ... will go from (10% below 2.5B and 20% above 2.5B) to (10% below 4.5B and 20% above 4.5B).

-- Credit on vacation and training would stay same but "pay hours" would go up ... (possibly keep vacation credit/week at 22:45 but pay as high as 35 hrs/week) ... expect the same type of deal for CQ.

-- retirement would get 1%-2% bump to stay in line with UAL and AA

-- Also considering a base stipend between $1000 and $500/month depending on where you live ... to cover parking and cost of living expenses. (example .. $1000 for NYC and $500 for ATL)

-- We did not have time to discuss sick time or pay banding or training freezes ... (not sure my buddy asked for that info)

-- My buddy got the impression that DALPA is/was "onboard" with these numbers ... So if you disagree, you better bend some reps ears!"


I'd vote No on that. We'd be paying for most of our own "raise".
That's about 25% over 3 years. We needed 18% to match American and they are two years behind us for the next contract. PS would still be 2-3 months each based on estimates using Jerry's numbers. That puts ER FO up to almost $200 an hour or so with override which was C2K Tristar pay. $230K-$260K a year with an 87 average and PS. Easy $300K plus with only a few Greenies and no busting my knots.

For the "you won't see the C2012 3/3 that would make this year around 15% I think...? I got no beef with the pay/credit compromise as long as we can make it work in PBS.

I've flown with plenty of guys that said 25% alone over three years would be okay. Especially the older ones.
Reply
Old 05-07-2015 | 10:29 AM
  #3965  
scambo1's Avatar
The Brown Dot +1
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,775
Likes: 0
From: 777B
Default

Originally Posted by hitimefurl
That's about 25% over 3 years. We needed 18% to match American and they are two years behind us for the next contract. PS would still be 2-3 months each based on estimates using Jerry's numbers. That puts ER FO up to almost $200 an hour or so with override which was C2K Tristar pay. $230K-$260K a year with an 87 average and PS. Easy $300K plus with only a few Greenies and no busting my knots.

For the "you won't see the C2012 3/3 that would make this year around 15% I think...? I got no beef with the pay/credit compromise as long as we can make it work in PBS.

I've flown with plenty of guys that said 25% alone over three years would be okay. Especially the older ones.
Pretty sure they weren't talking about funding that 25% themselves though.
Reply
Old 05-07-2015 | 10:30 AM
  #3966  
Purple Drank's Avatar
Straight QOL, homie
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,202
Likes: 1
From: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Default

Originally Posted by hitimefurl

I've flown with plenty of guys that said 25% alone over three years would be okay. Especially the older ones.
we know something's about to be aggressively, desparately sold when this clown shows up.

and keep in mind, that "rumor" didn't even address the pending sick leave, OE, JV, and other givebacks...the other shoe has yet to drop.
Reply
Old 05-07-2015 | 10:32 AM
  #3967  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Likes: 0
Default

Insulting, self funding POS..

Rumor grade?? 99% true. Look no further than the pay no credit for vacation and training. To accurate to be false.

If the NYC stipend is $1000, do us DTW pilots have to pay??
Reply
Old 05-07-2015 | 10:38 AM
  #3968  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,465
Likes: 0
From: A330 First Officer
Default

[QUOTE=gzsg;1875602]Insulting, self funding POS..

Rumor grade?? 99% true. Look no further than the pay no credit for vacation and training. To accurate to be false.

If the NYC stipend is $1000, do us DTW pilots have to pay??[/QUOTE]

Now that's pretty funny!
Reply
Old 05-07-2015 | 10:42 AM
  #3969  
pilotjockey's Avatar
ready for mo money
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
From: Left Behind
Default

Originally Posted by ERflyer
Not my post but this is what's on chitchat: The rumor du jour:

"-- Pay on a three year deal would look like ... 9%DOS, 6% on 1/1/16, 4%, 4% ...

-- Profit sharing concession would look like this ... will go from (10% below 2.5B and 20% above 2.5B) to (10% below 4.5B and 20% above 4.5B).

-- Credit on vacation and training would stay same but "pay hours" would go up ... (possibly keep vacation credit/week at 22:45 but pay as high as 35 hrs/week) ... expect the same type of deal for CQ.

-- retirement would get 1%-2% bump to stay in line with UAL and AA

-- Also considering a base stipend between $1000 and $500/month depending on where you live ... to cover parking and cost of living expenses. (example .. $1000 for NYC and $500 for ATL)

-- We did not have time to discuss sick time or pay banding or training freezes ... (not sure my buddy asked for that info)

-- My buddy got the impression that DALPA is/was "onboard" with these numbers ... So if you disagree, you better bend some reps ears!"


I'd vote No on that. We'd be paying for most of our own "raise".
that would put 757 fo at 165.82 and cut the ps check by 2.5%. not nearly enough shift away from ps, we oughtta get even more put on the payrates. dont like a stipend for certain bases over others since everyone can bid just about any base these days, if you dont like it you can bid out. count me as a no
Reply
Old 05-07-2015 | 10:49 AM
  #3970  
Purple Drank's Avatar
Straight QOL, homie
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,202
Likes: 1
From: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Default

Originally Posted by pilotjockey
dont like a stipend for certain bases over others since everyone can bid just about any base these days, if you dont like it you can bid out. count me as a no
exactly. the company wants to keep guys in NYC.

taking a piece of our money "pie" to solve the company's problem is unacceptable.

This contract is about solving our problems. Or waiting it out while collecting our PS checks.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kilroy
ExpressJet
10796
01-11-2016 06:49 AM
FastDEW
Major
201
09-03-2011 06:42 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
ksatflyer
Hangar Talk
10
08-20-2008 09:14 PM
INAV8OR
Mergers and Acquisitions
66
05-15-2008 04:37 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices