![]() |
Originally Posted by slowplay
(Post 1890773)
My sources tell me it's the SEC guys mucking things up. They have a history of not following rules (Criminoles and War Schooners), and have a propensity of taking care of themselves before they take care of the group.:D
BTW, who is the "CVG mafia"? Near as I can remember there's the three CVG LEC guys (where the two votes are generally split) and two CVG based committee chairs on the MEC. Also, Pinho and White haven't been around the MEC for a long time. You might need some new sources.;) |
Originally Posted by rube
(Post 1890819)
You made up two-thirds of that, the other third is speculation. Politics at its best.
I consider this validation of the reports posted here in the last week or so. |
Scambo, I asked drank and George very specific questions.
Which have not been answered. None of the council one update covers either. It sites 'third rail' concerns. Is that the survey? Is that some simply council 1 pilots issues? What is it? We don't know because half truths,rumor and innuendo play better to angry people looking for answers and/ or hope. Look at our national elections, like American Idol! I do know I just got this from the Union: This document is also available on the Delta MEC website, https://dal.alpa.org. Click on True Headings graphic on the homepage. A92715 DAL Publication Masthead True Heading 071213.jpg 15-06 May 28, 2015 Respecting the Process Since the beginning of this year, our MEC has been absorbed in its duty to achieve our next contract. Eight meetings to date; each one marked by voting decisions where the majority of the governing body sets the course of this union in collective bargaining. Unanimous decisions are rare, but consensus has obvious value to everyone who participates in a democracy, despite our differences on the issues. Politics and process are two distinctly different entities. It is one thing to be on the minority side of a vote, and another to accuse the union of violating the process. This accusation was made in 2012, though the accuser did not cite the specific parts of governance that were violated, and our failure to thoroughly repudiate the false claim allowed a festering division to unnecessarily form in our ranks. The insinuation that our process has not been respected in this cycle of collective bargaining has recently appeared in the same local council communications from which it originated last time and was repeated today by another council in their communications, so we think it’s important to clear up a few things before we get to the point where we have a tentative agreement, and you have a vote to cast. Any member may view our governing documents on the Delta MEC Secretary’s page at dal.alpa.org. These include the ALPA Constitution and By-Laws, the ALPA Administrative Manual, and the Delta MEC Policy Manual. Like the U.S. Constitution, the ALPA Constitution trumps all, the ALPA Administrative Manual outlines the organization and execution of various union functions, and the Delta MEC Policy Manual applies solely to the Delta MEC. We invite every Delta pilot to examine these documents. A comparison of the rules and our actions will show that we have never failed in our duty to strictly observe both the governance and the process, which is the way the MEC chooses to conduct business within the confines of our governance. At times, individual representatives disagree with the consensus, and at times their different perspectives spill into their communications to the line pilots. It is often the natural result of frustration with the issues surrounding any group effort, and a minority effort to influence the majority. However for you, the pilot, it is important to make it clear (and easily verified) that we have never violated our governance, nor the process that is determined by the consensus, or simply by the majority of the MEC. Any assertions to the contrary are not true, and have never been true with the Delta MEC. When we arrive at a tentative agreement with Delta Air Lines, the final choice on whether or not that agreement meets with your requirements will be yours, and yours alone. No process, no theory, no government, no union, no representative, no organization and no other person can tell you how to vote. So as we wade through the issues, strictly observing our governance and using processes deemed appropriate by the MEC, please keep that in mind. Air Line Pilots Association, International www.alpa.org |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1890793)
speed or quality?
|
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1890789)
|
Originally Posted by Alan Shore
(Post 1890833)
Crab legs are on me!!!
|
Originally Posted by Elliot
(Post 1890837)
OUCH!! :D 80KTS, are you going to take that from Alan? :cool:
|
Originally Posted by slowplay
(Post 1890768)
So with the facts, where's "politics at it's worst"? Again, shoot outside the circle, please. |
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1890776)
Look who showed up! Right on cue. ;)
|
Originally Posted by Purple Drank
(Post 1890826)
They're popping out of the woodwork. Clearly, some cagess have been rattled.
I consider this validation of the reports posted here in the last week or so. To wit: 1. The negotiator resigned (he told me it was so he could spend more time with his family, and maybe, just once, actually see a soccer game). The MEC chairman cannot remove a negotiator. 2. A new negotiating chairman was NOT appointed. A new negotiator was elected. 3. Timbo's remarks about his rep are not supported by evidence, hence they are speculation. Your move. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:29 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands