Search

Notices

Details on Delta TA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-31-2015 | 12:01 PM
  #5251  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by dalad
All so true, the stock buy back is already yesterday's news. If they had spent a fraction of the money on supertugs for every hub, and a replacement for the MD-80's it would have been $ well spent. RA and his minions aren't looking so smart anymore. Blowing billions on stockbuybacks and fuel hedges to go along with a now questionable refinery purchase. It's starting to look like RA and the boys are only interested in lining their pockets long term. If they wanted to reduce the stock float why not do a reverse 2 for 1 or 4 for 1 split? I know, Wall Street would hate that but the effect would be only temporary as all things are.
I'll go along with this. With Leo, the mechanism for enrichment was making compensation tied to cash on hand. Now, it's the stock price. AFAIK it just happens to be the metric that best correlates to executive compensation. So THEIR Step 1: compensate executives, Step 2: compensate Wall Street.

I don't think there is really any confusion on this. Of course, it has nothing to do with a TA. OUR Step 1 involves our family, and pilot group. We have no legal way to prevent stock buybacks.

We DO have the ability to think for ourselves, and decide whether therecan be a deal that allows multiple Step 1's to be satisfied.

You can't tell from the last pages of APC, of course, but this is theoretically about the pilots making decisions.
Reply
Old 05-31-2015 | 12:23 PM
  #5252  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 463
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Sink r8
You can't tell from the last pages of APC, of course, but this is theoretically about the pilots making decisions.
We agree, it is about pilots making decisions for their compensation, quality of life and family. Pushback is mounting in preparation for a C2012 type rushed deal with concessions followed by a full court press sales job lacking accurate pro/con paper. If the union intends to put out a sub par TA and sell the he11 out of it, the membership is preparing themselves to abort the abomination before it gains traction, as they should.
Reply
Old 05-31-2015 | 12:24 PM
  #5253  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
Your analysis is spot on except for the reasoning. It has nothing to do with goodwill. Everyone knows there's almost no such thing as long term investors anymore. Institutionals and hedge funds are very short term oriented. This buy back is NOTHING MORE than management using internally generated cash to buy stock as needed to ensure their stock options can be exercised at a profit after the lock-up date. It's a pure personal enrichment play.



If the health of the company was their main focus, they would use these funds as you've suggested above.



Carl

Agree.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 05-31-2015 | 12:45 PM
  #5254  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by dtfl
Go back and read my post where I spoke to my rep. It WAS DN....he is for keeping SLOA, 23G, etc, etc.

DN won't cave. The new guard is a whole lot smart than the former Spain-sheep crowd.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 05-31-2015 | 12:58 PM
  #5255  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by EdGrimley
We agree, it is about pilots making decisions for their compensation, quality of life and family. Pushback is mounting in preparation for a C2012 type rushed deal with concessions followed by a full court press sales job lacking accurate pro/con paper. If the union intends to put out a sub par TA and sell the he11 out of it, the membership is preparing themselves to abort the abomination before it gains traction, as they should.
I have no problem with pilots pushing back/sending back an unsatisfactory deal. This isn't 2012. So I have no issue with your conditional statement, if there is a subpar TA to reject.

The problem I have is when the politics of trying to lead opinion with leaks and lies damage the deal itself. No one has the right to try to make an unsat TA a self-fulfilling prophecy by sabotaging the process. A full-blown sales-job AGAINST a TA that hasn't even been reached today, has been underway for weeks. It's obvious, it reeks, and it's expensive to all of us.
Reply
Old 05-31-2015 | 01:05 PM
  #5256  
Purple Drank's Avatar
Straight QOL, homie
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,202
Likes: 1
From: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Default

Originally Posted by Sink r8
A full-blown sales-job AGAINST a TA that hasn't even been reached today, has been underway for weeks. It's obvious, it reeks, and it's expensive to all of us.
"Full-blown sales-job?" No. It's a spontaneous grassroots push from the bottom up to make sure we don't get blindsided by a crap deal. Again, you squeal when the messier aspects of a democracy appear.

And it's not using a dime of our dues money. Opposed to DALPA's C12 propaganda campaign, whose slick marketing materials cost us, what, $1 million?
Reply
Old 05-31-2015 | 01:12 PM
  #5257  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Sink r8
Step 1: elect Carl's friends
Step 2: doesn't matter.

This is a power struggle. The TA is an inconsequential backdrop for the guys who want to be in charge. It's been going on for over 11,000 posts, +/- some excellent underboob. DPA, C2012, whatever:

it's. a. power. struggle.

You can take just about any situation going several years back, and interchange the posts: they all say the same thing.

The real questions are 1) can the guys actually doing the work can get the best outcome possible with Carl's friends rehearsing speeches in front of the mirror instead of studying the information, and unable to make actual decisions, 2) do the guys actually doing the work have the right read on the situation, and 3) is there really a deal to be had early that works for the Delta pilots?

Oh, and if you're, say, a Delta pilot waiting to express your view via a vote, or looking for an exchange of perspectives on specifics, sit down in the back of the room, and try to keep your mouth shut, so as not to interrupt the power struggle. Carl will tell you how to vote.
The adults are talking here Sink r8, so you can just stay in your jammys and hope the "power struggle" you're so worried about doesn't involve someone killing power to your puter.

Carl
Reply
Old 05-31-2015 | 01:18 PM
  #5258  
Purple Drank's Avatar
Straight QOL, homie
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,202
Likes: 1
From: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Default

Originally Posted by Sink r8
Step 1: elect Carl's friends
Step 2: doesn't matter.
Well, Carl doesn't have any friends, so that's out.

it's. a. power. struggle.
No.

it's.about.more.money.and.more.time.off.
Reply
Old 05-31-2015 | 01:21 PM
  #5259  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Sink r8
I'll go along with this. With Leo, the mechanism for enrichment was making compensation tied to cash on hand. Now, it's the stock price. AFAIK it just happens to be the metric that best correlates to executive compensation. So THEIR Step 1: compensate executives, Step 2: compensate Wall Street.

I don't think there is really any confusion on this. Of course, it has nothing to do with a TA. OUR Step 1 involves our family, and pilot group. We have no legal way to prevent stock buybacks.

We DO have the ability to think for ourselves, and decide whether therecan be a deal that allows multiple Step 1's to be satisfied.

You can't tell from the last pages of APC, of course, but this is theoretically about the pilots making decisions.
Nothing theoretical about it Sink r8. What you and Prodessor, and slowplay and Sailingfun and rube, etc are so concerned about is that decision might be made without your side completely controlling the message. Despite your admonishments that we're ruining everything and losing money by communicating with our reps, nobody is listening to you. The reps don't seem to care one bit about the names you're calling them and how you're characterizing them. They're communicating with us despite your powerful efforts.

I can only imagine it must be frustrating for you, but let it go. It's happening, and it will continue to happen. It's the very best thing that could be happening.

Carl
Reply
Old 05-31-2015 | 01:23 PM
  #5260  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Purple Drank
Well, Carl doesn't have any friends, so that's out.
It's true. I had Timbo, but then he kept drinking all my beer. Then I was left with Bender Rodtsquare, but now he has a thing for Clamp.

Life is weird.

Carl
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kilroy
ExpressJet
10796
01-11-2016 06:49 AM
FastDEW
Major
201
09-03-2011 06:42 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
ksatflyer
Hangar Talk
10
08-20-2008 09:14 PM
INAV8OR
Mergers and Acquisitions
66
05-15-2008 04:37 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices