Search
Notices

Details on Delta TA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-01-2015, 07:29 PM
  #5331  
Gets Weekends Off
 
notEnuf's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Position: stake holder ir.delta.com
Posts: 10,034
Default

Just a reminder how old and stale these pay rates really are. They were written 15 years ago.

unnamed.jpg
notEnuf is offline  
Old 06-01-2015, 07:34 PM
  #5332  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Hawaii50's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: 757 Left
Posts: 1,306
Default

It comes down to state owned businesses competing with publicly held companies outside their own region. These states don't have our interests in mind. Not sure how many here remember the Arab oil embargo. Our supposed friends in the region had us by the nuts. Do we want to allow their states to weaken our carriers like they have done with many carriers throughout the world then stand by while they hold us hostage to their politics again? A few Europe to USA flights could turn into a large number in short order. Hopefully it takes care of itself though lack of interested pilots for the ME carriers as the U.S. Big 4 hire in mass but the battle needs to be fought now.
Hawaii50 is offline  
Old 06-01-2015, 07:37 PM
  #5333  
Gets Weekends Off
 
notEnuf's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Position: stake holder ir.delta.com
Posts: 10,034
Default

Screenshot (44).jpg
Half of these are long gone.
notEnuf is offline  
Old 06-01-2015, 08:09 PM
  #5334  
Gets Weekends Off
 
prex8390's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,146
Default

I found it ironic of Tim Clark to say our working conditions are bad, while its no Google, I feel it would better here than there. But I dont have a dog in that fight seeing as I've never worked over there.
prex8390 is offline  
Old 06-01-2015, 08:24 PM
  #5335  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TheManager's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,503
Default

Originally Posted by shiznit View Post
Hope I'm not interpreting sink incorrectly, I don't like it when other improperly opine on one of my posts....

I think he's actually saying the reverse is true. The 19 members that make up the MEC should be (or are) frustrating for the line pilots because there is a power struggle that is harming our unified front. Management will use the disunity to weaken our position. Infighting does not put more money in our pockets.
Harming our unified front? Which front of is this you speak of? There is no unified front.

I've been an ALPA member and supporter for 25 years. Never have I seen a weaker charade when it came down to unifying this pilot group prior to this negotiation. No real effort what so ever. Just lip service.

What is astounding is that even after the DPA close call, back to business as usual.

Sad actually. Shiznit. Pull your head out and remove the asshat. Ask yourself some honest questions as to why there is a power struggle.

Maybe, perhaps maybe, there is a top down hierarchy run by the shadow old guard that are finally getting stood up too. God forbid. You mean, not all the LECs are falling in line and snap off a salute! What the #%$@ ! Perhaps these recalcitrant LECs are actually following their constituents wishes. Imagine that for a second.

So. If there is infighting, whose fault is that? Who does he MEC chair work for? Who does the shadow MEC work for?

It's not amazing to me at all that you are not no longer an elected rep.
TheManager is offline  
Old 06-01-2015, 08:38 PM
  #5336  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Hawaii50's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: 757 Left
Posts: 1,306
Default

Originally Posted by TheManager View Post
Harming our unified front? Which front of is this you speak of? There is no unified front.

I've been an ALPA member and supporter for 25 years. Never have I seen a weaker charade when it came down to unifying this pilot group prior to this negotiation. No real effort what so ever. Just lip service.

What is astounding is that even after the DPA close call, back to business as usual.

Sad actually. Shiznit. Pull your head out and remove the asshat. Ask yourself some honest questions as to why there is a power struggle.

Maybe, perhaps maybe, there is a top down hierarchy run by the shadow old guard that are finally getting stood up too. God forbid. You mean, not all the LECs are falling in line and snap off a salute! What the #%$@ ! Perhaps these recalcitrant LECs are actually following their constituents wishes. Imagine that for a second.

So. If there is infighting, whose fault is that? Who does he MEC chair work for? Who does the shadow MEC work for?

It's not amazing to me at all that you are not no longer an elected rep.
Which brings up the point, assuming all LECs know what their constituents put in their contract surveys, do one or two LECs have a right to stifle the stated contract priorities of the rest of the pilot group if they were different from their own group? They would have the right to argue their point obviously but how far would be too far?
Hawaii50 is offline  
Old 06-01-2015, 08:43 PM
  #5337  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 618
Default

Originally Posted by Hawaii50 View Post
Which brings up the point, assuming all LECs know what their constituents put in their contract surveys, do one or two LECs have a right to stifle the stated contract priorities of the rest of the pilot group if they were different from their own group? They would have the right to argue their point obviously but how far would be too far?

Since its majority rule, I would think no?
Professor is offline  
Old 06-01-2015, 08:52 PM
  #5338  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TheManager's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,503
Default

Originally Posted by Hawaii50 View Post
Which brings up the point, assuming all LECs know what their constituents put in their contract surveys, do one or two LECs have a right to stifle the stated contract priorities of the rest of the pilot group if they were different from their own group? They would have the right to argue their point obviously but how far would be too far?
Which brings up this point. Do you really think that one LEC would have vastly different survey results from another? Statistically and mathematically, not likely at all.
TheManager is offline  
Old 06-01-2015, 08:59 PM
  #5339  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Hawaii50's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: 757 Left
Posts: 1,306
Default

Originally Posted by TheManager View Post
Which brings up this point. Do you really think that one LEC would have vastly different survey results from another? Statistically and mathematically, not likely at all.
You may be right but there are definitely different demographics and backgrounds at the different bases.
Hawaii50 is offline  
Old 06-01-2015, 09:00 PM
  #5340  
The Brown Dot +1
 
scambo1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: 777B
Posts: 7,775
Default

Originally Posted by Hawaii50 View Post
Which brings up the point, assuming all LECs know what their constituents put in their contract surveys, do one or two LECs have a right to stifle the stated contract priorities of the rest of the pilot group if they were different from their own group? They would have the right to argue their point obviously but how far would be too far?
I think the fatal flaw in your question is that you believe the survey results survive first contact, except when the general term (survey results) is useful as a catch phrase in crowd control rebuttal.
scambo1 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kilroy
ExpressJet
10671
01-11-2016 06:49 AM
FastDEW
Major
201
09-03-2011 06:42 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
ksatflyer
Hangar Talk
10
08-20-2008 09:14 PM
INAV8OR
Mergers and Acquisitions
66
05-15-2008 04:37 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices