Search
Notices

Details on Delta TA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-01-2015, 04:14 PM
  #5321  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Default

Originally Posted by DeadHead View Post
What kind of legitimate debate do you expect when majority of our membership is given piecemeal information?

Good, reliable information warrants well-informed, coherent debate which leads to effective decision-making. However, we are constantly given vague updates from closed-door meetings held by our MEC, while being told not to pay attention to rumor or innuendo.
To name a few....
1. Survey Results (not published)
2. Contract Opener (vague)
3. Weekly Updates (vague and repetitive)

Rumor and innuendo, is basically all the line pilot has before being thrown a TA and told to get behind it. I've been making a conscience, effort on reaching out to my reps and usually the response is one of non-committal, agreement.
I'll stipulate to your assertion the communications effort is a source of great frustration, from the MEC and local reps both.

Sink, you write up a post like this after starting a thread saying that by discussing rumors we're are costing ourselves money through disunity, however the MEC and NC can engage in their "power struggle" at the expense of our 12,000+ pilots. Hypocrisy doesn't even begin to describe it. If you can't agree with that then I sincerely encourage you to do some soul searching to see which is more important, the union or our pilots.
I DO agree with you, and so I don't think you're getting my point.

First, it's not the discussion of the leaks that's reprehensible, it's the leaking itself.

Second, I'm not condoning this power struggle, I'm condemning it. I'm trying to highlight it. Trying to get guys into power, or pushing guys out of power is NOT serving the Delta pilots. And there are no sacred relics that need protecting.

The union is not more important than the pilots, it IS the pilots. diverting energy from negotiations, towards a political purpose, including via leaks, is stealing from all of us.
Sink r8 is offline  
Old 06-01-2015, 04:40 PM
  #5322  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by Sink r8 View Post
I'll stipulate to your assertion the communications effort is a source of great frustration, from the MEC and local reps both.
I have a feeling us talking about the TA before it is released is frustrating.

Us talking about the TA after the TA is released and before the vote is frustrating.

Us talking about the TA after it's been voted on is frustrating.

Basically, from what I understand, line pilots talking about a TA at any point, ever, is frustrating to the MEC and local reps both.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 06-01-2015, 04:49 PM
  #5323  
Gets Weekends Off
 
shiznit's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: right for a long, long time
Posts: 2,642
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid View Post
I have a feeling us talking about the TA before it is released is frustrating.

Us talking about it after the TA is released and before the vote is frustrating.

Us talking about the PWA after it's been voted on is frustrating.

Basically, line pilots are frustrating to the MEC.
Hope I'm not interpreting sink incorrectly, I don't like it when other improperly opine on one of my posts....

I think he's actually saying the reverse is true. The 19 members that make up the MEC should be (or are) frustrating for the line pilots because there is a power struggle that is harming our unified front. Management will use the disunity to weaken our position. Infighting does not put more money in our pockets.
shiznit is offline  
Old 06-01-2015, 05:12 PM
  #5324  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid View Post
I have a feeling us talking about the TA before it is released is frustrating.

Us talking about the TA after the TA is released and before the vote is frustrating.

Us talking about the TA after it's been voted on is frustrating.

Basically, from what I understand, line pilots talking about a TA at any point, ever, is frustrating to the MEC and local reps both.
Not saying pilot communication is a source of frustration TO the MEC and local reps, I'm saying communications FROM the MEC and LEC levels are a source of frustration to the pilots.

I think Deadhead is correct on that point.
Sink r8 is offline  
Old 06-01-2015, 05:18 PM
  #5325  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,522
Default

Originally Posted by shiznit View Post
Hope I'm not interpreting sink incorrectly, I don't like it when other improperly opine on one of my posts....

I think he's actually saying the reverse is true. The 19 members that make up the MEC should be (or are) frustrating for the line pilots because there is a power struggle that is harming our unified front. Management will use the disunity to weaken our position. Infighting does not put more money in our pockets.
As far as we can tell the "power struggle" stems from the leaked rumors…specifically those of concessions, some deep. If the rumors aren't true, there's nothing to worry about. If the rumors of concessions (some deep) are true, its a very good thing they were leaked so as to start the democratic pushback early and with more momentum in the frantic timeframe leading up to memory rat.
gloopy is offline  
Old 06-01-2015, 05:27 PM
  #5326  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,522
Default

The worm is turning on their pathetic little attempt to merchant marine our industry out from under us. I can't wait to see them choke on their super jumbos that they ordered with the express intent on barfing capacity all over US to EU and other direct non ME markets.
gloopy is offline  
Old 06-01-2015, 06:19 PM
  #5327  
Super Moderator
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: DAL 330
Posts: 6,868
Default Not exactly Awe inspiring

Get ready to bend over boys - we are getting close.

Scoop


Council 44 Hotline for Sunday May 31, 2015


Negotiating Process 102





Our Negotiating Committee and the Company met several times this past week. The MEC will receive a comprehensive update on the status of our negotiations and give further direction where needed. We expect that the majority of the meeting will be held in closed session.


Item 3. Negotiating Process “103”: With the 9th MEC meeting for this year scheduled this week, it should be clear that the elected representatives on the MEC have been deeply involved in the ongoing negotiations. As your representatives we have been mindful throughout of your goals and your priorities, as has the Master Chairman and the Negotiating Committee.

While we have kept your priorities and goals front and center during these negotiations, to be clear, this is a negotiation and negotiations require that both parties sign the agreement. Even in an up environment, this requires that both parties will have some of their concerns addressed before they will do so. We have looked at the company’s concerns, directed the negotiators to engage on some of them, and passed on others. Our goal is to negotiate the contract items that are consistent with your priorities and provide the maximum benefit for the most pilots.

We don’t shoot from the hip either when we give direction. In addition to your input, the MEC has received extensive briefings from industry experts, the NMB, negotiators, mediators, arbitrators, economic and financial analysis experts, our Pilot Director, and Delta’s Executive Leadership team. Like flying, the more information you have, the clearer the sight picture becomes. In our multiple MEC meetings, we have directed and redirected our negotiators. We never forget that each decision, and each vote made by the MEC has real consequences for the Delta pilots and their families. Frankly, this process is not for the faint of heart, or those weak on conviction; difficult decisions must be made by all involved in order to move negotiations forward. Failure to make those decisions can stall the negotiating process indefinitely. It is our firm belief that if we reach a TA, this TA will be a significant gain for the Delta Pilots.

As we move forward with our contract negotiations, rumors will abound and we hear them daily. Half-truths, partial information and plainly wrong information, almost always negative, is everywhere. Don’t let these rumors sway your determination, or distract you from your support of our negotiators. Historically, pilot groups that are supportive and unified behind their negotiating committee achieve superior results. We obtain more and greater victories by working together as a unified group.
Scoop is offline  
Old 06-01-2015, 06:25 PM
  #5328  
Works Every Weekend
 
Check Essential's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: 737 ATL
Posts: 3,506
Default

Originally Posted by Scoop View Post
Get ready to bend over boys - we are getting close.

Scoop


Council 44 Hotline for Sunday May 31, 2015

That's pretty depressing to read.
The Council 44 reps sound defeated.
Check Essential is offline  
Old 06-01-2015, 06:28 PM
  #5329  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by shiznit View Post
Hope I'm not interpreting sink incorrectly, I don't like it when other improperly opine on one of my posts....

I think he's actually saying the reverse is true. The 19 members that make up the MEC should be (or are) frustrating for the line pilots because there is a power struggle that is harming our unified front. Management will use the disunity to weaken our position. Infighting does not put more money in our pockets.
Originally Posted by Sink r8 View Post
Not saying pilot communication is a source of frustration TO the MEC and local reps, I'm saying communications FROM the MEC and LEC levels are a source of frustration to the pilots.

I think Deadhead is correct on that point.
I don't hear a darn thing you guys are saying over the sound of potato chip like crunching in my mouth.



forgot to bid is offline  
Old 06-01-2015, 07:02 PM
  #5330  
Gets Weekends Off
 
angry tanker's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: MD-11 F/O
Posts: 390
Default

Dutch are trying to stop it also.
Dutch gov't blocks Gulf carriers' expansion at Amsterdam?s Schiphol airport | Mideaster - Middle East News
angry tanker is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kilroy
ExpressJet
10671
01-11-2016 06:49 AM
FastDEW
Major
201
09-03-2011 06:42 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
ksatflyer
Hangar Talk
10
08-20-2008 09:14 PM
INAV8OR
Mergers and Acquisitions
66
05-15-2008 04:37 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices