Details on Delta TA
#5321
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,537
Likes: 0
From: Downward-Facing Dog Pose
•The Big 3 are using the Gulf carriers’ modest market incursions to create a boogey man against which they can rail publicly as a way of distracting the public from the big – though still not remarkable on a net margin basis – profits the U.S. carriers finally are earning.
•The fight against the Gulf carriers is a way to rally U.S. airline labor groups in support a management that’s seeking to protect U.S. jobs, thereby making it difficult for labor to fight management for big raises and increases in benefits now that the airlines are making decent money.
•The fight against the Gulf carriers is a way to rally U.S. airline labor groups in support a management that’s seeking to protect U.S. jobs, thereby making it difficult for labor to fight management for big raises and increases in benefits now that the airlines are making decent money.
Question: why aren't these 2 explanatory motives entirely plausible? Deflection/distraction are a BIG part of how "leadership" works these days, in DC and elsewhere.
Plausible? Yes, in some ways each theory is. But none of those theories is entirely satisfying, either.
#5322
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 0
What kind of legitimate debate do you expect when majority of our membership is given piecemeal information?
Good, reliable information warrants well-informed, coherent debate which leads to effective decision-making. However, we are constantly given vague updates from closed-door meetings held by our MEC, while being told not to pay attention to rumor or innuendo.
To name a few....
1. Survey Results (not published)
2. Contract Opener (vague)
3. Weekly Updates (vague and repetitive)
Rumor and innuendo, is basically all the line pilot has before being thrown a TA and told to get behind it. I've been making a conscience, effort on reaching out to my reps and usually the response is one of non-committal, agreement.
Good, reliable information warrants well-informed, coherent debate which leads to effective decision-making. However, we are constantly given vague updates from closed-door meetings held by our MEC, while being told not to pay attention to rumor or innuendo.
To name a few....
1. Survey Results (not published)
2. Contract Opener (vague)
3. Weekly Updates (vague and repetitive)
Rumor and innuendo, is basically all the line pilot has before being thrown a TA and told to get behind it. I've been making a conscience, effort on reaching out to my reps and usually the response is one of non-committal, agreement.
Sink, you write up a post like this after starting a thread saying that by discussing rumors we're are costing ourselves money through disunity, however the MEC and NC can engage in their "power struggle" at the expense of our 12,000+ pilots. Hypocrisy doesn't even begin to describe it. If you can't agree with that then I sincerely encourage you to do some soul searching to see which is more important, the union or our pilots.
First, it's not the discussion of the leaks that's reprehensible, it's the leaking itself.
Second, I'm not condoning this power struggle, I'm condemning it. I'm trying to highlight it. Trying to get guys into power, or pushing guys out of power is NOT serving the Delta pilots. And there are no sacred relics that need protecting.
The union is not more important than the pilots, it IS the pilots. diverting energy from negotiations, towards a political purpose, including via leaks, is stealing from all of us.
#5323
Us talking about the TA after the TA is released and before the vote is frustrating.
Us talking about the TA after it's been voted on is frustrating.
Basically, from what I understand, line pilots talking about a TA at any point, ever, is frustrating to the MEC and local reps both.
#5324
I have a feeling us talking about the TA before it is released is frustrating.
Us talking about it after the TA is released and before the vote is frustrating.
Us talking about the PWA after it's been voted on is frustrating.
Basically, line pilots are frustrating to the MEC.
Us talking about it after the TA is released and before the vote is frustrating.
Us talking about the PWA after it's been voted on is frustrating.
Basically, line pilots are frustrating to the MEC.

I think he's actually saying the reverse is true. The 19 members that make up the MEC should be (or are) frustrating for the line pilots because there is a power struggle that is harming our unified front. Management will use the disunity to weaken our position. Infighting does not put more money in our pockets.
#5325
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 0
I have a feeling us talking about the TA before it is released is frustrating.
Us talking about the TA after the TA is released and before the vote is frustrating.
Us talking about the TA after it's been voted on is frustrating.
Basically, from what I understand, line pilots talking about a TA at any point, ever, is frustrating to the MEC and local reps both.
Us talking about the TA after the TA is released and before the vote is frustrating.
Us talking about the TA after it's been voted on is frustrating.
Basically, from what I understand, line pilots talking about a TA at any point, ever, is frustrating to the MEC and local reps both.
I think Deadhead is correct on that point.
#5326
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,831
Likes: 172
From: window seat
Hope I'm not interpreting sink incorrectly, I don't like it when other improperly opine on one of my posts....
I think he's actually saying the reverse is true. The 19 members that make up the MEC should be (or are) frustrating for the line pilots because there is a power struggle that is harming our unified front. Management will use the disunity to weaken our position. Infighting does not put more money in our pockets.
I think he's actually saying the reverse is true. The 19 members that make up the MEC should be (or are) frustrating for the line pilots because there is a power struggle that is harming our unified front. Management will use the disunity to weaken our position. Infighting does not put more money in our pockets.
#5327
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,831
Likes: 172
From: window seat
The worm is turning on their pathetic little attempt to merchant marine our industry out from under us. I can't wait to see them choke on their super jumbos that they ordered with the express intent on barfing capacity all over US to EU and other direct non ME markets.
#5328
Moderator
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,263
Likes: 105
From: DAL 330
Get ready to bend over boys - we are getting close.
Scoop
Negotiating Process 102
Our Negotiating Committee and the Company met several times this past week. The MEC will receive a comprehensive update on the status of our negotiations and give further direction where needed. We expect that the majority of the meeting will be held in closed session.
Item 3. Negotiating Process “103”: With the 9th MEC meeting for this year scheduled this week, it should be clear that the elected representatives on the MEC have been deeply involved in the ongoing negotiations. As your representatives we have been mindful throughout of your goals and your priorities, as has the Master Chairman and the Negotiating Committee.
While we have kept your priorities and goals front and center during these negotiations, to be clear, this is a negotiation and negotiations require that both parties sign the agreement. Even in an up environment, this requires that both parties will have some of their concerns addressed before they will do so. We have looked at the company’s concerns, directed the negotiators to engage on some of them, and passed on others. Our goal is to negotiate the contract items that are consistent with your priorities and provide the maximum benefit for the most pilots.
We don’t shoot from the hip either when we give direction. In addition to your input, the MEC has received extensive briefings from industry experts, the NMB, negotiators, mediators, arbitrators, economic and financial analysis experts, our Pilot Director, and Delta’s Executive Leadership team. Like flying, the more information you have, the clearer the sight picture becomes. In our multiple MEC meetings, we have directed and redirected our negotiators. We never forget that each decision, and each vote made by the MEC has real consequences for the Delta pilots and their families. Frankly, this process is not for the faint of heart, or those weak on conviction; difficult decisions must be made by all involved in order to move negotiations forward. Failure to make those decisions can stall the negotiating process indefinitely. It is our firm belief that if we reach a TA, this TA will be a significant gain for the Delta Pilots.
As we move forward with our contract negotiations, rumors will abound and we hear them daily. Half-truths, partial information and plainly wrong information, almost always negative, is everywhere. Don’t let these rumors sway your determination, or distract you from your support of our negotiators. Historically, pilot groups that are supportive and unified behind their negotiating committee achieve superior results. We obtain more and greater victories by working together as a unified group.
Scoop
Council 44 Hotline for Sunday May 31, 2015
Negotiating Process 102
Our Negotiating Committee and the Company met several times this past week. The MEC will receive a comprehensive update on the status of our negotiations and give further direction where needed. We expect that the majority of the meeting will be held in closed session.
Item 3. Negotiating Process “103”: With the 9th MEC meeting for this year scheduled this week, it should be clear that the elected representatives on the MEC have been deeply involved in the ongoing negotiations. As your representatives we have been mindful throughout of your goals and your priorities, as has the Master Chairman and the Negotiating Committee.
While we have kept your priorities and goals front and center during these negotiations, to be clear, this is a negotiation and negotiations require that both parties sign the agreement. Even in an up environment, this requires that both parties will have some of their concerns addressed before they will do so. We have looked at the company’s concerns, directed the negotiators to engage on some of them, and passed on others. Our goal is to negotiate the contract items that are consistent with your priorities and provide the maximum benefit for the most pilots.
We don’t shoot from the hip either when we give direction. In addition to your input, the MEC has received extensive briefings from industry experts, the NMB, negotiators, mediators, arbitrators, economic and financial analysis experts, our Pilot Director, and Delta’s Executive Leadership team. Like flying, the more information you have, the clearer the sight picture becomes. In our multiple MEC meetings, we have directed and redirected our negotiators. We never forget that each decision, and each vote made by the MEC has real consequences for the Delta pilots and their families. Frankly, this process is not for the faint of heart, or those weak on conviction; difficult decisions must be made by all involved in order to move negotiations forward. Failure to make those decisions can stall the negotiating process indefinitely. It is our firm belief that if we reach a TA, this TA will be a significant gain for the Delta Pilots.
As we move forward with our contract negotiations, rumors will abound and we hear them daily. Half-truths, partial information and plainly wrong information, almost always negative, is everywhere. Don’t let these rumors sway your determination, or distract you from your support of our negotiators. Historically, pilot groups that are supportive and unified behind their negotiating committee achieve superior results. We obtain more and greater victories by working together as a unified group.
#5329
#5330
Hope I'm not interpreting sink incorrectly, I don't like it when other improperly opine on one of my posts....
I think he's actually saying the reverse is true. The 19 members that make up the MEC should be (or are) frustrating for the line pilots because there is a power struggle that is harming our unified front. Management will use the disunity to weaken our position. Infighting does not put more money in our pockets.
I think he's actually saying the reverse is true. The 19 members that make up the MEC should be (or are) frustrating for the line pilots because there is a power struggle that is harming our unified front. Management will use the disunity to weaken our position. Infighting does not put more money in our pockets.

Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



