![]() |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1711199)
We originally opened for something way beyond 265 dollars an hour. The negotiating committee did not even like the opener and after the fact stated several times we could have had a agreement early on at a higher rate had we not opened around 400 an hour. We had 15 on order and with the disagreement the last 7 orders were cancelled.
3b6 was a one shot deal and we blew are wad. The company vowed not to take delivery of any airframe again without a agreement on rates. That basically nullified 3b6. As far as Carl's question on UAL the Delta rates established on the 73n, 767-400 and 777 were well above anything else in the US industry. It forced the CEO of united to raise his offer substantially and UAL settled for what were essentially the 3b6 rates. The UAL referred to it as the Delta dot and said it tied his hands. |
Originally Posted by 76drvr
(Post 1711405)
I just checked APC and it shows SWA 737 CA rates at $216 and DAL 747/777 rates at $263. Also, SWA doesn't have a 15% 401k contribution. Where are you getting your numbers?
We also worked few hours in 2013.then SW and earned more credit. One JoBerg trip on a GS could pay over 20 grand for 3 days. |
Originally Posted by 76drvr
(Post 1711417)
First why don't you answer the questions instead of attack fellow pilots? Let's review:
So we trade a productivity concession for pay? How much do you think this productivity concession you propose is worth, particularly if its only for 4 months? Do you think that RA will write a billion dollars worth of improvements into our contract for this concession? I think we should take a pay cut and spend the rest of our careers on the jet we fly today. Executive management's 300% to 700% increase in compensation since bankruptcy needs to double and our pay cuts will fund that. Have you offered your services to them? You seem to know a great deal about how to negotiate. Would you explain the "pie" to us? Or perhaps the "shines new jets"? Or "the time value of money"? Or the "black swan"? Those are some of my favorites. Jerry |
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1711358)
Well that was very alfaromeo of you.
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1711358)
It's very important for us to talk to our reps, MEC admins, legislators, etc. We can't all be elected. Your demeaning of talking is unfortunate.
|
Originally Posted by Timbo
(Post 1711360)
Did you completely miss my point? I said we can't do it, IF THE MEC WON'T EVEN TRY!
Originally Posted by Timbo
(Post 1711360)
Why can't our MEC even mention the word, Restoration?
C2K happened not only because we were united and the MEC was more manly than the one we have today, but also because the market value of the industry, i.e., pilot compensation, was higher than it is today. Using the very thick hairs on their collective chests, the MEC of the day capitalized on that market and leapfrogged UAL by a percentage point. All I'm saying is that we must recreate that market somehow in order to have the same leverage that we had back then, or find different leverage than what was used back then. |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1711440)
On 1 jan the rate goes to 270.00. Add in the DC plan and profit sharing around 15% and were talking 350.00 per hour.
We also worked few hours in 2013.then SW and earned more credit. One JoBerg trip on a GS could pay over 20 grand for 3 days. 1.15 x $270 = $310.50, which is still $9/hr. below our 2004 pay rate, 11 years later, oh, and 11 years ago we had a DB plan too! :rolleyes: Also, the JNB trip is 5 days, not 3. :rolleyes: Just about nobody with a regular line can greenslip one due to the new FAR's. (100 in 28). If you already have a 78hr. line, you can't add a 32hr. trip to it in most cases. There are lots of them in open time that can't be picked up, or assigned as GS, except to a reserve, who might be using rolling thunder, if he's smart, but he won't get double pay for the trip, just 32hrs. over the cap. That new FAR has become a bidding-math nightmare, month to month, but it has also required more pilots at the top, which is good for everyone. And for 76 driver, I think that SW rate you are looking at is their 'trip pay' which is less than one hour. Converted to one hour, they are right up there with our 777/747 rates. If I run for MEC Chairman, can I count on your support? How's your strike fund funded? It's nice that we no longer have the "Golden Handcuffs" of a DB plan to worry about if we do walk. Your point about ATC taking 11 years to replace 11 thousand controllers only strengthens my point, they can't replace all of us overnight. Now, if we could get some industry wide support from the other two majors airlines, that would help us all. Why there was no call for a National SOS when we all started losing our pay/retirements is beyond me. Absent that leverage, what do you have left to negotiate with? I wonder what our MEC discussed with the other ALPA groups, AA and the SWAPA in Chicago? I hope it was finding some mutual ground for support to get the RLA changed. |
Originally Posted by Alan Shore
(Post 1711475)
I must have. My apologies. You asked why they won't even try to get back to UAL +1, and I responded that we're already beyond that.
I have no idea, Timbo, and I have no control over them other than with my vote. I do know that my reps are committed to maximizing our returns at every opportunity. I know that's not as glamorous as full restoration yesterday, but it's put a whole lot of money back in my pocket that was not there before. C2K happened not only because we were united and the MEC was more manly than the one we have today, but also because the market value of the industry, i.e., pilot compensation, was higher than it is today. Using the very thick hairs on their collective chests, the MEC of the day capitalized on that market and leapfrogged UAL by a percentage point. All I'm saying is that we must recreate that market somehow in order to have the same leverage that we had back then, or find different leverage than what was used back then. And how about the upcoming retirement wave? And the 1500hr. rule? You don't think that adds more leverage than we had in 1999-2000? And what about the consolidated industry, fewer fare wars, record earnings. Is that not leverage? And what about our 401K's in our name, vs. losing a DB plan if you walk? Is that not more leverage than we ever had in 1999? If we don't have more leverage now, we never will! |
Originally Posted by Timbo
(Post 1711477)
Y
And for 76 driver, I think that SW rate you are looking at is their 'trip pay' which is less than one hour. Converted to one hour, they are right up there with our 777/747 rates.. |
Originally Posted by Alan Shore
(Post 1711475)
I must have. My apologies. You asked why they won't even try to get back to UAL +1, and I responded that we're already beyond that.
I have no idea, Timbo, and I have no control over them other than with my vote. I do know that my reps are committed to maximizing our returns at every opportunity. I know that's not as glamorous as full restoration yesterday, but it's put a whole lot of money back in my pocket that was nuot there before. C2K happened not only because we were united and the MEC was more manly than the one we have today, but also because the market value of the industry, i.e., pilot compensation, was higher than it is today. Using the very thick hairs on their collective chests, the MEC of the day capitalized on that market and leapfrogged UAL by a percentage point. All I'm saying is that we must recreate that market somehow in order to have the same leverage that we had back then, or find different leverage than what was used back then. The leadership and communication for C2K was lightyears better as well. To me, that is the missing ingredient. Jerry |
Originally Posted by Alan Shore
(Post 1711350)
You have no clue what I want, brother.
Originally Posted by Alan Shore
(Post 1711350)
All I did was list four possible outcomes of you being on the Negotiating Committee or the MEC. You agreed with two of them, asked me for clarifications about the other two, and then reached a conclusion about my wants that, for the life of me, has me scratching my head wondering if you even bother trying to put aside your personal prejudices and assumptions when you read other pilots' words.
Originally Posted by Alan Shore
(Post 1711350)
And how much more than talk have you ever done?
To answer your question... I've done enough that the DALPA guys focus a heck of a lot of attention on trying to discredit me (since they can't really discredit my argument). I've done enough that guys like you wish I would have a lobotomy and change my point of view because you think we'd be "better off" if I quit espousing said point of view. I've communicated my input to my reps, despite the fact that it goes in one ear and out the other. I was involved in getting the resolution passed that ultimately resulted in opening up our BrokerageLink to more investment options, giving many of us a better ability to recover from the loss of the pension and giving the younger among us the ability to make an incredible retirement for themselves and their families. I was involved in getting a candidate questionnaire (with the questions many pilots wanted answered) distributed to all C44 pilots during the LEC election several years ago. In fact, the whole thing was my idea. And while I'm sure you and the other Lee Moak disciples didn't like it (in fact, hated it), I think it was helpful to our council's pilots to see something other than the controlled message DALPA is so careful to craft for us to see. So those are a few things. What have you done? |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:43 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands