Search
Notices

Details on Delta TA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-25-2014, 03:46 PM
  #971  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by gzsg View Post
Square

What, in your opinion, is my agenda?

IMO my agenda has been clearly written here.

We got backdoored on CDOs and reduced profit sharing.

Will do everything I can to stop that from happening again.



Jerry
Your "agenda" is to throw as much spaghetti against the wall and see what sticks. It's fine if you have a legitimate source to come on here and throw this crap out... and you may very well have one, but if you think your word on this constitutes any kind of legitimacy in it's own right, you are delusional.

C'mon Jerry, don't you see the irony here? You throw that in the punchbowl, with no evidence that any of it has ever been uttered by management, and say "trust me... I know this to be true." The exact same thing you rail on the MEC and management about.

I totally agree about the CDO thing. Totally. That was waaaaay out of bounds. I don't agree with what happened with the profit sharing thing either, except that that is more a function of bad timing rather than bad intent. If DAL were breaking even, I guarantee you that you (and probably I) would be singing a different tune about it. But I have become much more of a student of investing in this industry and I personally feel that we are going to be making a profit for a long long time (DYODD however, your opinion may differ). SO for this upcoming contract... and that is as far as I am willing to commit... I will take the PS risk.

Please... stop the torch burning.... I am interested in what you have to say if you back it up with facts and not innuendo and speculation.
tsquare is offline  
Old 08-25-2014, 04:04 PM
  #972  
:-)
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Default

Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver View Post
The track record for CDO's ("SDP's") in this industry is clear. Guys like them and bid them because it allows them to be home every day and do whatever it is they want/need to do. They do not sleep during the day. The only sleep they get is whatever sleep the CDO provides. There may be rare exceptions to that, but the track record is clear that the vast majority do exactly as I described. Operating a flight (whether it's a short flight or a long flight) on maybe 3 or 4 hours of sleep in a 24 hour period is UNSAFE. Period.

If we ever get these horrid things, I will not sign the release to operate that morning flight. If I can't avoid the trip, I'll be forced to call in fatigued for the morning flight. Do you really want to put Delta pilots in that position?
I have flown many a CDO with Delta pilots riding in the back.
Mesabah is offline  
Old 08-25-2014, 04:13 PM
  #973  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah View Post
I have flown many a CDO with Delta pilots riding in the back.

OK.. what are the specifics of your company's CDOs? Convince me that they are safe 100% of the time.
tsquare is offline  
Old 08-25-2014, 04:21 PM
  #974  
:-)
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare View Post
OK.. what are the specifics of your company's CDOs? Convince me that they are safe 100% of the time.
Here I pulled one from the bid packet:
TRIP #528 D7527 DTW: ____5__ effective SEP 12-SEP 26 no exceptions.
DAY FLT# DEP ARR DEP ARR BLK SAT TOG DUTY CREDIT LO CODE F/24 TAFB A/C
---- ----------- --- --- --------- --------- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ --------- ---- ----- ---RPT (23)19:08 0h45
Fr 1 03655 DTW MBS (23)19:53 (00)20:48 0h55 0h51 10h27 0h51 DutyRm 0h00 1h40 CPJ
Sa 2 03963 MBS DTW (11)07:15 (12)08:02 0h47 0h49 * 0h49 0h00 12h54 CPJ
RLS (12)08:17 1h42 0h15 13h09 4h00(M)
__________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ _______
TAFB: 13h09 Block Time: 1h42 Credit Time: 4h00(D) 135.2941176
__________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ _______

That would be worth 7.5 hours for you, with 10 hours of sleep.
Mesabah is offline  
Old 08-25-2014, 04:22 PM
  #975  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare View Post
Your "agenda" is to throw as much spaghetti against the wall and see what sticks. It's fine if you have a legitimate source to come on here and throw this crap out... and you may very well have one, but if you think your word on this constitutes any kind of legitimacy in it's own right, you are delusional.

C'mon Jerry, don't you see the irony here? You throw that in the punchbowl, with no evidence that any of it has ever been uttered by management, and say "trust me... I know this to be true." The exact same thing you rail on the MEC and management about.

I totally agree about the CDO thing. Totally. That was waaaaay out of bounds. I don't agree with what happened with the profit sharing thing either, except that that is more a function of bad timing rather than bad intent. If DAL were breaking even, I guarantee you that you (and probably I) would be singing a different tune about it. But I have become much more of a student of investing in this industry and I personally feel that we are going to be making a profit for a long long time (DYODD however, your opinion may differ). SO for this upcoming contract... and that is as far as I am willing to commit... I will take the PS risk.

Please... stop the torch burning.... I am interested in what you have to say if you back it up with facts and not innuendo and speculation.
In a perfect world your way would be great. In our world, by the time the line pilots find out what is really happening it will be too late. I.e C2012 reduced profit sharing, ALV 2 hour increase, 99 hour reserve, change in summer calendar, etc.

The reality of pay banding and longer freezes is becoming more apparent.

Reduced profit sharing will as well.

The only way to stop this is to get the word out now, just like we did with CDOs.

Jerry
gzsg is offline  
Old 08-25-2014, 04:26 PM
  #976  
The Brown Dot +1
 
scambo1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: 777B
Posts: 7,775
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah View Post
Here I pulled one from the bid packet:
TRIP #528 D7527 DTW: ____5__ effective SEP 12-SEP 26 no exceptions.
DAY FLT# DEP ARR DEP ARR BLK SAT TOG DUTY CREDIT LO CODE F/24 TAFB A/C
---- ----------- --- --- --------- --------- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ --------- ---- ----- ---RPT (23)19:08 0h45
Fr 1 03655 DTW MBS (23)19:53 (00)20:48 0h55 0h51 10h27 0h51 DutyRm 0h00 1h40 CPJ
Sa 2 03963 MBS DTW (11)07:15 (12)08:02 0h47 0h49 * 0h49 0h00 12h54 CPJ
RLS (12)08:17 1h42 0h15 13h09 4h00(M)
__________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ _______
TAFB: 13h09 Block Time: 1h42 Credit Time: 4h00(D) 135.2941176
__________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ _______

That would be worth 7.5 hours for you, with 10 hours of sleep.
That doesn't look like the CDOs we were negotiating for. That looks more like 1 leg out, 1 leg back with a 10 hr layover.
scambo1 is offline  
Old 08-25-2014, 04:32 PM
  #977  
:-)
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Default

The thing with CDO's is it is difficult to get a pilot that is on long call, or even short call, to cover the trip. So there will always be CDO pickups/green slips. A SDP line holder will always get 120 credit a month easy.
Mesabah is offline  
Old 08-25-2014, 05:19 PM
  #978  
At home on the maddog!
 
DAL 88 Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: ATL MD-88A
Posts: 2,874
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah View Post
I have flown many a CDO with Delta pilots riding in the back.
Not this one.
DAL 88 Driver is offline  
Old 08-25-2014, 08:25 PM
  #979  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler View Post
Why would you post all that when it has nothing to do with the discussion? The discussion is about whether the C2K opener was ever released to the pilots. It absolutely was. That's not in dispute. It was not "just conceptual", it was detailed like our NWA openers were. Now this union REFUSES to do that, just like it refuses to ever release survey results.

But I did find this portion of your linked post interesting:

---------------------

...For the first time, Delta pilots realized that they were not alone in their willingness to act in a unified manner. Acting like a union was no longer unthinkable for Delta pilots as over 1200 pilots participated in the picketing...

...Management was getting nervous -- the pilots were acting in a truly unified manner.

...Polling numbers showed that the number of pilots willing to go on strike and shut down the airline was skyrocketing. In the spring of 1996, just prior to signing on to the concessions of Contract '96, barely 20% of Delta pilots were willing to strike for any length of time. Just over four years later, over 95% were now willing to strike "for as long as it takes" in order to achieve an industry-leading contract.


-----------------

There's no question that Delta pilot "have it in them." This was proof. But now our union has been completely co-opted by Delta management. I don't know if we can muster the effort to force our union to behave like a union. The recall of every ATL rep would be a great start.

Carl
How does DPA fit with your above statement?
sailingfun is offline  
Old 08-25-2014, 08:27 PM
  #980  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler View Post
Yet that's not what you said. This is what you said:



Carefully crafted language designed to deceive.

Carl
Still not sure what your talking about unless it is the missing H in hour. Still waiting for you to post the numbers!
sailingfun is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kilroy
ExpressJet
10671
01-11-2016 06:49 AM
FastDEW
Major
201
09-03-2011 06:42 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
ksatflyer
Hangar Talk
10
08-20-2008 09:14 PM
INAV8OR
Mergers and Acquisitions
66
05-15-2008 04:37 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices