Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Scope and Cost Neutral >

Scope and Cost Neutral


Notices

Scope and Cost Neutral

Old 09-07-2016 | 05:18 AM
  #51  
satchip's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,350
Likes: 0
From: Flying the SEC
Default

C2012 scope provisions turned out positively for us because of a confluence of events. The Cogan 1500 hr rule and the availability of 717s for almost free. One of those factors is being lobbied hard in Congress to be removed. How long do you think that 1500 hr rule will remain? Never underestimate the power of big money influencing government.

So when the Regionals start hiring 900, 750, even 250 hr guys again, those 76 seaters become more viable. Why would we allow more? Furthermore, why is it not the stated goal of our UNION that every Delta passenger be flown by Delta pilots? Isn't that the purpose of a UNION?
Reply
Old 09-07-2016 | 05:43 AM
  #52  
crewdawg's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,438
Likes: 438
Default

Originally Posted by Sunvox
So Trip, how many pilots has UAL hired since 2014 and how many has Delta hired?
Since hiring started in 2014, DAL has hired ~2,800 pilots and are projected to hire another 400 by years end (~1,250 total for 2016). By the end of the year, 2014-2016 hires will make up 24% of the list. I just got done reading this and am interested in UALs numbers.
Reply
Old 09-07-2016 | 06:11 AM
  #53  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
APA gave up significant scope concessions in their negotiations. They are parking 190s and buying more RJs.

By all means, continue with your awful analysis....
In their last negotiation the American pilots did not allow the negotiating commuter to discuss scope. Same at United.

80 what are your cost estimates for the upcoming scope concessions I listed?
Reply
Old 09-07-2016 | 06:28 AM
  #54  
Bus driver
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 894
Likes: 9
Default

Originally Posted by satchip
C2012 scope provisions turned out positively for us because of a confluence of events. The Cogan 1500 hr rule and the availability of 717s for almost free. One of those factors is being lobbied hard in Congress to be removed. How long do you think that 1500 hr rule will remain? Never underestimate the power of big money influencing government.

So when the Regionals start hiring 900, 750, even 250 hr guys again, those 76 seaters become more viable. Why would we allow more? Furthermore, why is it not the stated goal of our UNION that every Delta passenger be flown by Delta pilots? Isn't that the purpose of a UNION?
Great points satchip. I can take a stab at you question. Our UNION isn't saying that, because they also work for the airlines that benefit from those 76 seaters. No conflict of interest there...
Reply
Old 09-07-2016 | 06:52 AM
  #55  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 988
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
Meanwhile Gerry threw out the number 8000. He just throws stuff out there hoping something is correct trying to promote his DPA agenda.

WN pilots fly wayyyy more block hours per pilot by the way. Those guys work freaking hard, even with trips touching.
Please explain to us mathematically how his numbers are way off. Southwest doesn't allow any 50-76 seat flying to be outsourced and has trip touching. Those alone would push the numbers to 5000-6000 more pilots. Remember, the 4000+ pilots at Delta Connection are operating under more efficient staffing requirements at Delta.

Originally Posted by Elliot
Jerry's numbers are exaggerated, maybe for effect, but they're still wrong. He will never prove his numbers or show his math when called out on it, and loses the message with constant unsubstantiated rumors. Frankly, it has gotten old. I have NEVER been a fan of Doesn't Provide Anything for its membership, but Jerry just helps solidify the decision.
How exactly are is numbers wrong? Over 4000 pilots are outsourced on 50-76 seat jets. Southwest doesn't allow this. Explain how he is wrong, please. Making up names for DPA only furthers the idea you are wrong.
Reply
Old 09-07-2016 | 07:18 AM
  #56  
80ktsClamp's Avatar
Da Hudge
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
Default

Originally Posted by 404yxl
Please explain to us mathematically how his numbers are way off. Southwest doesn't allow any 50-76 seat flying to be outsourced and has trip touching. Those alone would push the numbers to 5000-6000 more pilots. Remember, the 4000+ pilots at Delta Connection are operating under more efficient staffing requirements at Delta.


How exactly are is numbers wrong? Over 4000 pilots are outsourced on 50-76 seat jets. Southwest doesn't allow this. Explain how he is wrong, please. Making up names for DPA only furthers the idea you are wrong.

You and Gerry's fuzzy math aside, let's do some real math since this is what you two are cheering for: The DPA has a bit over 3100 ACTIVE cards. By their count, they need 6700 ACTIVE (not members like their strangely similar to RH and CC's biased graphs like to emphasize) cards to get a vote. The real number is rapidly approaching and will exceed 7000 ACTIVE cards needed as hiring continues. 6 years in and the active card count dwindles further away from a vote...
Reply
Old 09-07-2016 | 07:21 AM
  #57  
80ktsClamp's Avatar
Da Hudge
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
Default

Originally Posted by gzsg
In their last negotiation the American pilots did not allow the negotiating commuter to discuss scope. Same at United.

80 what are your cost estimates for the upcoming scope concessions I listed?
Your "upcoming" scope concessions are just throwing crap against the wall and hoping something sticks. It's not even worth addressing since you don't deal in reality.
Reply
Old 09-07-2016 | 07:29 AM
  #58  
Hawaii50's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,325
Likes: 9
From: 3fidy
Default

Originally Posted by 404yxl
Please explain to us mathematically how his numbers are way off. Southwest doesn't allow any 50-76 seat flying to be outsourced and has trip touching. Those alone would push the numbers to 5000-6000 more pilots. Remember, the 4000+ pilots at Delta Connection are operating under more efficient staffing requirements at Delta.


How exactly are is numbers wrong? Over 4000 pilots are outsourced on 50-76 seat jets. Southwest doesn't allow this. Explain how he is wrong, please. Making up names for DPA only furthers the idea you are wrong.
When you and jerry push your dpa agenda at this point in negotiations it just shows you are really selfish ....s. You have a beef with alpa for whatever reason and are willing to throw the rest of us who want a better contract under the bus to achieve it. We don't care about your agenda so move on to something more constructive.
Reply
Old 09-07-2016 | 07:32 AM
  #59  
notEnuf's Avatar
Racketeer
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,248
Likes: 707
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
Your "upcoming" scope concessions are just throwing crap against the wall and hoping something sticks. It's not even worth addressing since you don't deal in reality.
I completely agree the SCOPE concessions are as of yet unsubstantiated, however I do think DALPA is implementing their time honored tradition of incrementally relaxing scope for the purpose of "extracting value." We will all see soon enough but I'm practicing how fast I can type "I told you so" every day.

Hoping I'm wrong.

BTW I sleep so much better at night now that I am once again "furlough protected."
Reply
Old 09-07-2016 | 07:32 AM
  #60  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 988
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
You and Gerry's fuzzy math aside...
I didn't ask for the merits of DPA. I asked you to show us how he is mathematically wrong.

It's very telling that you continually ignore to answer that and then just bash DPA. I didn't even care to bring up DPA until you repeatedly turn it into a DPA bashfest instead of answering a legitimate claim.

Explain to us mathematically how his numbers are way off. Southwest doesn't allow any 50-76 seat flying to be outsourced and has trip touching.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
OutsourceNoMo
American
52
09-24-2023 10:35 AM
Turbanpilot
American
1446
12-24-2014 05:31 PM
CAL EWR
United
44
11-26-2012 01:29 PM
Redeye Pilot
United
4
12-15-2010 05:57 AM
av8rmike
Cargo
36
09-16-2006 10:24 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices