Search
Notices
Endeavor Air Regional Airline

9E (Endeavor) or BK

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-16-2013, 12:54 PM
  #101  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Avroman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: FIRE ALPA
Posts: 3,085
Default

Originally Posted by Imapilot2 View Post
I know a few thousand guys that would like that but can't because the only interviews are military and Endeavor.
And there are more and more Endeavor pilots proving every day that the SSP isn't worth the crap pay. If you want to wait years for your interview/class making 30K, go right ahead. Meanwhile many have shown Delta just what they think of their interview carrot.
Avroman is offline  
Old 12-16-2013, 01:58 PM
  #102  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Flitestar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 614
Default

Originally Posted by Avroman View Post
And there are more and more Endeavor pilots proving every day that the SSP isn't worth the crap pay. If you want to wait years for your interview/class making 30K, go right ahead. Meanwhile many have shown Delta just what they think of their interview carrot.
This ^

SSP was a carrot useful for the top senior only. The rest of the pilot group was just fooled by ALPA into thinking it was useful for them too.

Lots of pilots were eager to find something to cling on in order to justify themselves into voting that POS contract in. The SSP was one of those gems.
Flitestar is offline  
Old 12-16-2013, 02:40 PM
  #103  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,648
Default

Originally Posted by Flitestar View Post
This ^

SSP was a carrot useful for the top senior only. The rest of the pilot group was just fooled by ALPA into thinking it was useful for them too.

Lots of pilots were eager to find something to cling on in order to justify themselves into voting that POS contract in. The SSP was one of those gems.
The union mislead us also when the said in order to be eligible one must have been a captain at some point. Later it comes out thT you must be an active captain
gojo is offline  
Old 12-16-2013, 05:01 PM
  #104  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Flitestar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 614
Default

Yup, that was another big one. It's ok tho, ALPA and/or management (including Delta) know now that they can get absolutely anything they want from this pilot group. Only takes a few carrots, a pocket mirror and a small portable smoke machine.
Flitestar is offline  
Old 12-16-2013, 05:16 PM
  #105  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Beechnut58's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2013
Position: 190 FO
Posts: 406
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar View Post
Why do we have Doctors? Why do we have added requirements to be members of the Bar? Nurse Practitioners, in my experience, are better diagnosticians because they take more time with "their patient." Lawyers used to have no entry requirements other than Bar Exam passage.

Could a CRJ Captain out fly a WWII Cadet? It isn't truly a valid point. Many WWII Cadets were unable to find jobs in aviation due to their lack of education.

Restrictions which limit the pool of qualified applicants result in less supply, which drives up demand and prices. While a Nurse Practitioner is worth $75K to $90K (around here) Doctors routinely earn $125K to $250 for the same skill set. If the Doctor further specializes into something highly technical, like anesthesiology, they can be worth $350K to $500K.

Could you or I do that job with a good database and some decent technical training? Sure. But, is that how the World works?

Where I come from a $180,000 a year job is still a big deal. It is worth the effort to prepare oneself for that opportunity. As professionals, one path to increase pay is to increase the minimum entry requirements. Management wants to lower costs and lower the standards to hold this position. They would hire $10 an hour rampers to fly airplanes, if they could. ALPA harmed this profession with the Pinnacle Bridge Agreement. Lee Moak (although I admire much of what he has done) and Capt. Wychor worked to lower standards in this profession.

and if you think I'm wrong, Southwest is an excellent airline.
Except for the fact that doctors are required to do that schooling because it is directly linked to the job. In no way shape or form is a marketing degree directly related to flying an airplane. Purely a tactic to weed out applicants. I'd much rather fly with the guy with experience and is easy to get along with then the college guy that can't fly for sh** and is a di**.
Beechnut58 is offline  
Old 12-16-2013, 06:43 PM
  #106  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Flitestar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 614
Default

This is were a lot of guys/gals miss the point.

Your college education gives you more than just some extra knowledge in Marketing -i.e. It shows other qualities that the airline may find attractive, and make you an overall well rounded individual. Maybe they don't want one OR the other, maybe they want the experienced pilot who ALSO has an education. Maybe they don't want only a Chuck Yeager, but someone who also has the higher ed to go with those flying skills. College education and good airmanship can actually be found in the same individual you know...

Somewhat of a skewed analysis too when you associate a college educated pilot exclusively with being a d!&k or unable to fly, it doesn't really work, you got both complete tools and terrible pilots on both sides of the "college" fence.

When I read about an airline requiring a college degree in order to apply, I interpret that they are looking for a pilot to be more than just a good yoke handler and button pusher in their organization, and I understand that, it actually makes sense to me. And yes, it does go side by side with professionalism in my opinion.

With that said, I do agree that it is currently used as a "weeding" technique by many airlines, and at the end of the day, a pilot with a college degree is not a 100% sure bet of a great pilot/employee, but neither is a ten thousand hour pilot who has really only flown 1hr, ten thousand times.

Give the airline a pilot with both the experience and the higher education and odds are better for things to work out well for everybody, IMHO.
Flitestar is offline  
Old 12-17-2013, 04:11 AM
  #107  
Gets Weekends Off
 
jethikoki's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2013
Posts: 471
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar View Post
Why do we have Doctors? Why do we have added requirements to be members of the Bar? Nurse Practitioners, in my experience, are better diagnosticians because they take more time with "their patient." Lawyers used to have no entry requirements other than Bar Exam passage.

Could a CRJ Captain out fly a WWII Cadet? It isn't truly a valid point. Many WWII Cadets were unable to find jobs in aviation due to their lack of education.

Restrictions which limit the pool of qualified applicants result in less supply, which drives up demand and prices. While a Nurse Practitioner is worth $75K to $90K (around here) Doctors routinely earn $125K to $250 for the same skill set. If the Doctor further specializes into something highly technical, like anesthesiology, they can be worth $350K to $500K.

Could you or I do that job with a good database and some decent technical training? Sure. But, is that how the World works?

Where I come from a $180,000 a year job is still a big deal. It is worth the effort to prepare oneself for that opportunity. As professionals, one path to increase pay is to increase the minimum entry requirements. Management wants to lower costs and lower the standards to hold this position. They would hire $10 an hour rampers to fly airplanes, if they could. ALPA harmed this profession with the Pinnacle Bridge Agreement. Lee Moak (although I admire much of what he has done) and Capt. Wychor worked to lower standards in this profession.

and if you think I'm wrong, Southwest is an excellent airline.
If the degree was/is so important then why are those pilots without a degree allowed to keep their jobs during a merger or acquisition? I know, just a weeding tool for hiring pilots but still makes you wonder about standards and fairness in the system.

Some have negative feelings about a flow ok, but shouldn't agreements be honored? Mesaba Airlines had a flow agreement with NWA. Why wasn't ALL Mesaba pilots on property after the DAL NWA merger was complete allowed to flow to DAL. Only a small percentage were allowed. Wonder what would happen if DAL only allowed a small percentage of NWA pilots to keep their jobs at DAL or not honor their agreement. How does Lee Moak face the Mesaba pilots and explain why he chose not to fight DAL to honor their agreement all the while professing unity? Double standards maybe or more unity for mainline pilots?

Pinnacle/Endeavor Airlines did not need to be in bankruptcy except DAL wanted it to be. I agree with some of your statements BB but history has also demonstrated the playing field IS NOT level for regional pilots. When regional pilots try to seek or gain opportunities in bad situations you get chastised rather then equal and fair treatment. It was probably wrong and inappropriate if there was a secret back door agreement that DALPA was not informed or kept out of the loop but then how much effort would PNCL pilots get from DALPA if the company was liquidated? It was your airline that wanted PNCL in bankruptcy but I doubt if anyone at Delta would care much if everyone at the time lost their jobs at PNCL but hay at least you would have your sacred hiring standards intact that I am sure every DAL pilot on property now has been through.
jethikoki is offline  
Old 12-17-2013, 05:00 AM
  #108  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Imapilot2's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Captain Jack
Posts: 1,003
Default

Originally Posted by jethikoki View Post
If the degree was/is so important then why are those pilots without a degree allowed to keep their jobs during a merger or acquisition? I know, just a weeding tool for hiring pilots but still makes you wonder about standards and fairness in the system.

Some have negative feelings about a flow ok, but shouldn't agreements be honored? Mesaba Airlines had a flow agreement with NWA. Why wasn't ALL Mesaba pilots on property after the DAL NWA merger was complete allowed to flow to DAL. Only a small percentage were allowed. Wonder what would happen if DAL only allowed a small percentage of NWA pilots to keep their jobs at DAL or not honor their agreement. How does Lee Moak face the Mesaba pilots and explain why he chose not to fight DAL to honor their agreement all the while professing unity? Double standards maybe or more unity for mainline pilots?

Pinnacle/Endeavor Airlines did not need to be in bankruptcy except DAL wanted it to be. I agree with some of your statements BB but history has also demonstrated the playing field IS NOT level for regional pilots. When regional pilots try to seek or gain opportunities in bad situations you get chastised rather then equal and fair treatment. It was probably wrong and inappropriate if there was a secret back door agreement that DALPA was not informed or kept out of the loop but then how much effort would PNCL pilots get from DALPA if the company was liquidated? It was your airline that wanted PNCL in bankruptcy but I doubt if anyone at Delta would care much if everyone at the time lost their jobs at PNCL but hay at least you would have your sacred hiring standards intact that I am sure every DAL pilot on property now has been through.

You answered your own question, NWA had an agreement with Mesaba, not Delta. Mesaba was lucky to get anything. Ask your reps, that were in the room during the original meeting with DAL, about how that meeting went.
Imapilot2 is offline  
Old 12-17-2013, 05:08 AM
  #109  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Imapilot2's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Captain Jack
Posts: 1,003
Default

Originally Posted by Avroman View Post
And there are more and more Endeavor pilots proving every day that the SSP isn't worth the crap pay. If you want to wait years for your interview/class making 30K, go right ahead. Meanwhile many have shown Delta just what they think of their interview carrot.

I hear you but many are also getting the job more and more every day proving it worked for some. From a pilot standpoint I hate the games as much as you but guys "showing Delta" is meaningless to DAL. They couldn't care less. They, unfortunately for us pilots, got what they wanted. This aftermath was a calculated result they expected.....and they would and will do it agian to another regional. Hopefully many will get a job at mainline and get out of the subcontractor job.
Imapilot2 is offline  
Old 12-17-2013, 05:35 AM
  #110  
Gets Weekends Off
 
jethikoki's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2013
Posts: 471
Default

Originally Posted by Imapilot2 View Post
You answered your own question, NWA had an agreement with Mesaba, not Delta. Mesaba was lucky to get anything. Ask your reps, that were in the room during the original meeting with DAL, about how that meeting went.
You say I did I say ALPA did NOT and where ALPA and DALPA got in bed with their DAL management to work against a fellow ALPA member! So we can agree to disagree. BTW, I was at PNCL not Mesaba so it was not applicable to me but it bothers me to see something like this. It may be legal but it is less then honorable and ALPA and DALPA should have taken higher ground and worked to honor the agreements NWA had with a fellow ALPA member. What do you think would happen if only 90% of NWA pilots would have been allowed to go to DAL after the merger? I guess anything is ok until it will affect you.
jethikoki is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices