Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > Endeavor Air
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Endeavor? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Endeavor?

Search
Notices
Endeavor Air Regional Airline

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Endeavor?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-06-2022, 05:50 PM
  #24711  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2017
Posts: 2,767
Default

I understand this sounds crazy from you alls side of the fence, but we are going to work on us first. We aint here to save the world.
theUpsideDown is offline  
Old 01-06-2022, 08:53 PM
  #24712  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Posts: 507
Default

Originally Posted by theUpsideDown View Post
I understand this sounds crazy from you alls side of the fence, but we are going to work on us first. We aint here to save the world.
The more Endeavor’s problem grows, the more Delta’s problem grows.
Kforekyle is offline  
Old 01-07-2022, 05:09 AM
  #24713  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2020
Posts: 2,189
Default

Originally Posted by Kforekyle View Post
The more Endeavor’s problem grows, the more Delta’s problem grows.
Delta has their solution. It’s call hiring 50 pilots a week and insourcing the flying.

It’s an industry issue. Skywest lost a net 75 in one month. Legacies are aware of what’s happening and already making changes. Delta has the 220 (look at the bid pack of how much firmer RJ stuff it’s done in NYC/SEA/SLC), United has announced single class 50s are going, and American has JB doing more feeder and shuttle flying. AA tried retention with their WOs and it’s done nothing to stem attrition. Fact is regionals will shrink, and every legacy has made their plans for years on the exit moves.

1/4 of EDV is on year 1 pay, and a large chunk of high payroll (plus vacation, sick) pilots will be gone in a year. That means a leaner more efficient pilot group, cheaper pilots. I think the next step is as staffing hits, the 200s go. Single fleet further improves the cost base and staffing efficiency.

They aren’t going to spend crazy money to keep 200s flying, especially with the payload hits it is taking now.
PilotBases is offline  
Old 01-07-2022, 05:32 AM
  #24714  
Lineholder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2013
Position: Death by Powerpoint
Posts: 447
Default

Originally Posted by PilotBases View Post
Delta has their solution. It’s call hiring 50 pilots a week and insourcing the flying.

It’s an industry issue. Skywest lost a net 75 in one month. Legacies are aware of what’s happening and already making changes. Delta has the 220 (look at the bid pack of how much firmer RJ stuff it’s done in NYC/SEA/SLC), United has announced single class 50s are going, and American has JB doing more feeder and shuttle flying. AA tried retention with their WOs and it’s done nothing to stem attrition. Fact is regionals will shrink, and every legacy has made their plans for years on the exit moves.

1/4 of EDV is on year 1 pay, and a large chunk of high payroll (plus vacation, sick) pilots will be gone in a year. That means a leaner more efficient pilot group, cheaper pilots. I think the next step is as staffing hits, the 200s go. Single fleet further improves the cost base and staffing efficiency.

They aren’t going to spend crazy money to keep 200s flying, especially with the payload hits it is taking now.
EDV wants to hire 70+/month. By the end of 2022, if attrition remains the same as hiring, your looking at 40% of the airline being on probation and year 1 pay. If a pilot spends all their off time flying- you can maybe get 700 hours/year at EDV- so your also looking at 40% lacking the 1000 121 hours to upgrade. If you have to shrink the operation because EDV lacks captains, it will take longer to get the FOs 121 time (more FOs fighting over less flights).

The industry needs to figure out how to keep captains on CRJ9s and E175s, I’m sure Ed, Doug and Scott will have their innovative methods, but they need to work on them quick (while running their own airline).
web500sjc is offline  
Old 01-07-2022, 05:35 AM
  #24715  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Sep 2018
Posts: 70
Arrow

Originally Posted by PilotBases View Post
I think the next step is as staffing hits, the 200s go. Single fleet further improves the cost base and staffing efficiency.

They aren’t going to spend crazy money to keep 200s flying, especially with the payload hits it is taking now.
I can see that. It does nothing more than pass the buck to an FFD (e.g. OO), but it would certainly come with some cost savings for 9E.

The more I think about this I realize there won't be a real, definitive solution (re: attrition) that actually works in the next 3-5 years.
BaldEagleSq is offline  
Old 01-07-2022, 05:47 AM
  #24716  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Posts: 176
Default

Originally Posted by KSCessnaDriver View Post
Why do you think DALPA would agree to that? What's in it for them? And why do you think they would agree to any kind of side letter before they have ironed out their own contract?
Delta has already agreed to hire Endeavor's Captains and hiring them all immediately doesn't even require a side letter; just flow 1,000 now. Putting them on temporary assignment at Endeavor solves the attrition problem and ensures it's survival. Pilot pay is trivial compared to canceling flights, shrinking the airline, losing NYC slots and paying for unused airframes. This solution is coming. It's only a matter of months.
FliesInSoup is offline  
Old 01-07-2022, 06:08 AM
  #24717  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2020
Posts: 2,189
Default

Originally Posted by FliesInSoup View Post
Delta has already agreed to hire Endeavor's Captains and hiring them all immediately doesn't even require a side letter; just flow 1,000 now. Putting them on temporary assignment at Endeavor solves the attrition problem and ensures it's survival. Pilot pay is trivial compared to canceling flights, shrinking the airline, losing NYC slots and paying for unused airframes. This solution is coming. It's only a matter of months.
That would require DALPA concurrence, why would they agree?
PilotBases is offline  
Old 01-07-2022, 06:13 AM
  #24718  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Posts: 176
Default

Originally Posted by PilotBases View Post
That would require DALPA concurrence, why would they agree?
Sure it does, just like the conccurance they provided for the flow.
FliesInSoup is offline  
Old 01-07-2022, 06:17 AM
  #24719  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2020
Posts: 2,189
Default

Originally Posted by FliesInSoup View Post
Sure it does, just like the conccurance they provided for the flow.
That was a previously existing LOA that was deemed still active. There’s no LOA providing the ability for 1,000 Delta seniority list pilots to fly at another carrier. Why would Delta want to pay RJ captains Delta rates anyways?

The 220 fleet is set to double still will orders outstanding, and it sounds like more 717s are coming back. The RJ replacement plans are right in front of you.
PilotBases is offline  
Old 01-07-2022, 06:42 AM
  #24720  
Banned
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 2,012
Default

A big part of the solution is that the 200/145 are going away.

they will figure some way to staff the 64-76 seat flying but the single class RJ’s only last as long as they have captains to fly them
ZeroTT is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
StraightShooter
Endeavor Air
124
06-26-2023 10:23 AM
WARich
Delta
11220
06-10-2020 07:42 AM
Crash
Major
3437
01-30-2013 06:51 PM
shua757
Major
2
02-24-2009 06:44 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices