Any "Latest & Greatest" about Endeavor?
09-10-2015 | 08:41 AM
#782
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 2,574
Likes: 75
There used to be a reference in the FOM saying that you cannot plane side check your flight case containing the FOM due to security concerns. That no longer exists, or at least I can't find it.
Common sense prevails. If I'm heading home, I'll plane side check it. If I'm deadheading or going to work I'll put it in the overhead for that small risk that all the bags don't make it into the cargo.
Common sense prevails. If I'm heading home, I'll plane side check it. If I'm deadheading or going to work I'll put it in the overhead for that small risk that all the bags don't make it into the cargo.
09-10-2015 | 03:33 PM
#785
Line Holder
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Budget. A month and a half ago he would have said they were around the corner. Now he isn't so sure.
He mentioned that lower fuel costs have made the $ value of removing the weight of the kit bags less.
I think they're coming just at a slower pace than the last memo/flight ops update re: efb's seemed to indicate.
He mentioned that lower fuel costs have made the $ value of removing the weight of the kit bags less.
I think they're coming just at a slower pace than the last memo/flight ops update re: efb's seemed to indicate.
09-10-2015 | 04:04 PM
#787
Line Holder
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Budget. A month and a half ago he would have said they were around the corner. Now he isn't so sure.
He mentioned that lower fuel costs have made the $ value of removing the weight of the kit bags less.
I think they're coming just at a slower pace than the last memo/flight ops update re: efb's seemed to indicate.
He mentioned that lower fuel costs have made the $ value of removing the weight of the kit bags less.
I think they're coming just at a slower pace than the last memo/flight ops update re: efb's seemed to indicate.
I can't fathom how the $ value due to added fuel weight of 2 flight cases can be that significant. I'm sure we are paying way more to have all those paper jepps printed and then shipped. It's pathetic that we're one of the last groups still dragging those around with us everywhere we go.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
09-10-2015 | 04:07 PM
#788
Bracing for Fallacies
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,543
Likes: 0
From: In favor of good things, not in favor of bad things
Budget. A month and a half ago he would have said they were around the corner. Now he isn't so sure.
He mentioned that lower fuel costs have made the $ value of removing the weight of the kit bags less.
I think they're coming just at a slower pace than the last memo/flight ops update re: efb's seemed to indicate.
He mentioned that lower fuel costs have made the $ value of removing the weight of the kit bags less.
I think they're coming just at a slower pace than the last memo/flight ops update re: efb's seemed to indicate.
09-10-2015 | 04:08 PM
#789
Line Holder
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
I can't fathom how the $ value due to added fuel weight of 2 flight cases can be that significant. I'm sure we are paying way more to have all those paper jepps printed and then shipped. It's pathetic that we're one of the last groups still dragging those around with us everywhere we go.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
09-10-2015 | 04:09 PM
#790
Line Holder
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
I can't fathom how the $ value due to added fuel weight of 2 flight cases can be that significant. I'm sure we are paying way more to have all those paper jepps printed and then shipped. It's pathetic that we're one of the last groups still dragging those around with us everywhere we go.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
