Envoy 2019
01-04-2019, 11:18 AM
#81
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 3,657
Originally Posted by mketch11
From what limited understanding I have gained in researching such things, proffer to displace if you think there is a chance that they will not displace everyone with enough hours. If you think that everyone will displace then proffering to displace will only have you lose out on paid move and send you to training sooner. If all FOs with time are moving to the left seat regardless then a proffer will not do anything with regards to what equipment because a displacement will trump those once it comes to that. Someone correct me if I’m wrong. I left an email with a union rep to verify this and they said they would call me but never did.
Interesting...
01-04-2019, 11:32 AM
#82
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,510
Originally Posted by Cyio
This was the exact answer I gave as well, so I think we are on the right track. The question is, will they displace everyone as they start from the most junior and work up. Given they are pretty senior, there is a chance they dont displace.
Interesting...
Interesting...
And according to the contract interpretation, to be able to send DECs directly to a captain seat there has to be a standing vacancy, meaning more vacancies then eligible pilots on property.
And I’m pretty sure the company knows within a few pilots how many have the time and how vacancies to post.
01-05-2019, 01:49 AM
#86
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Pawn
Posts: 1,138
Originally Posted by Voski
Any chance reserve for FOs on the 145 is going to come down significantly this year for ORD or LGA?
01-05-2019, 03:30 AM
#87
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: May 2016
Posts: 1,609
Originally Posted by pitchattitude
I would be willing to bet there is NO ONE who has the time when the bid closes escapes. The company still thinks they need 125 OTS DECs. They are not going to allow pilots to skip out when they are paying $45K to hire someone qualified.
And according to the contract interpretation, to be able to send DECs directly to a captain seat there has to be a standing vacancy, meaning more vacancies then eligible pilots on property.
And I’m pretty sure the company knows within a few pilots how many have the time and how vacancies to post.
And according to the contract interpretation, to be able to send DECs directly to a captain seat there has to be a standing vacancy, meaning more vacancies then eligible pilots on property.
And I’m pretty sure the company knows within a few pilots how many have the time and how vacancies to post.
01-05-2019, 04:10 AM
#88
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2015
Posts: 687
Originally Posted by Pedro4President
I wonder how much it cost to send a 175 FO to 145 CA then to 175 CA. Those sim slots aren't cheap and time away from the line has to be added in. I have seen about six on the reserve list on the 145 CA DFW go back to training very recently. A forced upgrade plus a voluntary seat lock cost north of 8k.
01-05-2019, 04:23 AM
#89
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Posts: 1,729
Originally Posted by Pedro4President
I wonder how much it cost to send a 175 FO to 145 CA then to 175 CA. Those sim slots aren't cheap and time away from the line has to be added in. I have seen about six on the reserve list on the 145 CA DFW go back to training very recently. A forced upgrade plus a voluntary seat lock cost north of 8k.
01-05-2019, 11:48 AM
#90
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Position: Pipers!
Posts: 376
Originally Posted by Pedro4President
I wonder how much it cost to send a 175 FO to 145 CA then to 175 CA. Those sim slots aren't cheap and time away from the line has to be added in. I have seen about six on the reserve list on the 145 CA DFW go back to training very recently. A forced upgrade plus a voluntary seat lock cost north of 8k.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
