New PSA Pilot Pay Agreement
04-28-2019 | 02:08 PM
#341
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,510
Likes: 0
Cost neutral pay improvements
Pedro’s post and my reply touch on something the company could do to at least improve QOL that would be cost neutral and something I don’t understand why AAG does this.
It seems like all the AAG contract flying gets the best lines. Anyone know why this is? All the contract companies can make a profit paying more the the WOs and get better QOL. Why doesn’t AAG keep the better lines in house and have even more profit than they have now? It would not cost AAG or the WOs anything to do that.
Improving the lines should let the company make more money and allow them to pay more without cutting into the profit margin.
It seems like all the AAG contract flying gets the best lines. Anyone know why this is? All the contract companies can make a profit paying more the the WOs and get better QOL. Why doesn’t AAG keep the better lines in house and have even more profit than they have now? It would not cost AAG or the WOs anything to do that.
Improving the lines should let the company make more money and allow them to pay more without cutting into the profit margin.
04-28-2019 | 03:14 PM
#342
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 4,174
Likes: 157
Pedro’s post and my reply touch on something the company could do to at least improve QOL that would be cost neutral and something I don’t understand why AAG does this.
It seems like all the AAG contract flying gets the best lines. Anyone know why this is? All the contract companies can make a profit paying more the the WOs and get better QOL. Why doesn’t AAG keep the better lines in house and have even more profit than they have now? It would not cost AAG or the WOs anything to do that.
Improving the lines should let the company make more money and allow them to pay more without cutting into the profit margin.
It seems like all the AAG contract flying gets the best lines. Anyone know why this is? All the contract companies can make a profit paying more the the WOs and get better QOL. Why doesn’t AAG keep the better lines in house and have even more profit than they have now? It would not cost AAG or the WOs anything to do that.
Improving the lines should let the company make more money and allow them to pay more without cutting into the profit margin.
04-28-2019 | 04:51 PM
#343
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,707
Likes: 0
AA had that flying being done by eagle, then their stupid idea of busting eagle to 1/3 the size made their argument valid. But it was a false premise. Now we live with the shi+ they hand out and they expect you to be happy because you have flow.
04-28-2019 | 06:26 PM
#344
Line Holder
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 385
Likes: 1
Who wants endeavor like rates when we can taxi on two engines and run the APUs all flight long? After all summer is here with the heat and all those pop up thunderstorms. Refer to AOM1, it’s a safety issue. Might cost the company a little more in fuel, a little more than $15-20/hour, but can’t put a price on safety right?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
