![]() |
Originally Posted by Crimson37Roger
(Post 3311141)
“The 75” has me wanting to punch a wall. Why can’t people just be normal?
|
Above… now that’s an airplane!
“The other RJ” would have more than sufficed. We are flying RJs, and trying not to hit other RJs. “Thanks for your help on the pushback, sorry if a bit slow, just being cautious” I wonder if the FO went off the reservation or if that was the tone from both pilots. perhaps the CA wanted the number to apologize for an over zealous FO. I will give benefit of doubt that was the reason requesting a number. |
Originally Posted by CaseTractor
(Post 3311475)
Above… now that’s an airplane!
“The other RJ” would have more than sufficed. We are flying RJs, and trying not to hit other RJs. “Thanks for your help on the pushback, sorry if a bit slow, just being cautious” I wonder if the FO went off the reservation or if that was the tone from both pilots. perhaps the CA wanted the number to apologize for an over zealous FO. I will give benefit of doubt that was the reason requesting a number. My thought initially too. A “shut up beavis” moment on board followed by a request for number to call and apologize later. |
Originally Posted by CaseTractor
(Post 3311475)
Above… now that’s an airplane!
“The other RJ” would have more than sufficed. We are flying RJs, and trying not to hit other RJs. “Thanks for your help on the pushback, sorry if a bit slow, just being cautious” I wonder if the FO went off the reservation or if that was the tone from both pilots. perhaps the CA wanted the number to apologize for an over zealous FO. I will give benefit of doubt that was the reason requesting a number.
Originally Posted by duck of death
(Post 3311493)
My thought initially too. A “shut up beavis” moment on board followed by a request for number to call and apologize later.
|
Originally Posted by CaseTractor
(Post 3311475)
perhaps the CA wanted the number to apologize for an over zealous FO. I will give benefit of doubt that was the reason requesting a number.
|
Originally Posted by NoValueAviator
(Post 3311807)
That was my perception, although a lot of the time when the FO is acting like a stressed out goober like that the CA is part of it too.
The other option is, like you said, the captain instigated it via the FO, in which case the captain owns most of it. The FO didn't need to be a ****, so they own that part. |
It’s funny because he sounds exactly like most Envoy pilots on the radio. That lazy low toned voice that you can barely comprehend.
|
The FO is a hat guy. That's all I'm going to say about that.
|
Originally Posted by dera
(Post 3311906)
The FO is a hat guy. That's all I'm going to say about that.
|
Any tips or tricks I should know that will make my life a bit easier being a new commuting 145 ORD guy?
Anything specific about the jet that you guys like/dislike? |
Originally Posted by dera
(Post 3311906)
The FO is a hat guy. That's all I'm going to say about that.
|
Originally Posted by gbo2
(Post 3311947)
Any tips or tricks I should know that will make my life a bit easier being a new commuting 145 ORD guy?
Anything specific about the jet that you guys like/dislike? all the things. How much time you got? |
Originally Posted by CLE to IAH
(Post 3312003)
dislike? About the WSCOD?
all the things. How much time you got? Don’t wanna go into my first airline job hating life just because I’m on a less desirable jet. However I know commuting to reserve will be hell. I’m prepared for that. Mostly just wondering the pros/cons of being on the 145. |
The pros, you got a job.
The cons you got a job. Have to balance. |
Originally Posted by Sasquatched
(Post 3311968)
Everyone is telling me it was TS but they have no proof. Were you able to confirm it was TS?
|
Originally Posted by gbo2
(Post 3312007)
Don’t wanna go into my first airline job hating life just because I’m on a less desirable jet. However I know commuting to reserve will be hell. I’m prepared for that. Mostly just wondering the pros/cons of being on the 145.
You’re going to go into your first airline job hating life because your first airline job is at envoy. |
Originally Posted by gbo2
(Post 3311947)
Any tips or tricks I should know that will make my life a bit easier being a new commuting 145 ORD guy?
=12pt Some gate agents are not that helpful/friendly. The actual plane is fine, not sure what the lines look like in Chicago for the 145, but I don’t think they're nearly as bad as the DFW trips |
Originally Posted by mej3811
(Post 3312014)
It wasn’t him, I can confirm
|
Originally Posted by SomePilotDude
(Post 3312187)
You have no clue what you’re talking about.
|
Originally Posted by SomePilotDude
(Post 3312187)
You have no clue what you’re talking about.
There was no TS that has done that flight so far this month. |
Originally Posted by DescendVia
(Post 3312529)
There was no TS that has done that flight so far this month.
|
Originally Posted by gbo2
(Post 3311947)
Any tips or tricks I should know that will make my life a bit easier being a new commuting 145 ORD guy?
Anything specific about the jet that you guys like/dislike? The best tip I can offer is resign and go somewhere else. Junior on the 145 at envoy is a special place in hell. |
Originally Posted by DescendVia
(Post 3312529)
There was no TS that has done that flight so far this month.
|
Originally Posted by SomePilotDude
(Post 3312612)
Maybe look at a previous month as Dera said.
"Next" month is all DECS knows, and next month is now November since it's past the 15th. Got to go to fos.aa.com and look up the flight number, gate, and origin and destination. |
And another MEC Chairman has chosen to leave Envoy for an outside carrier. Looks like ND is heading to JetBlue. Clearly the promise of flow and large sums of cash isn’t working as well as AAG had hoped.
|
Originally Posted by ClappedOut145
(Post 3315614)
And another MEC Chairman has chosen to leave Envoy for an outside carrier. Looks like ND is heading to JetBlue. Clearly the promise of flow and large sums of cash isn’t working as well as AAG had hoped.
|
Originally Posted by ClappedOut145
(Post 3315614)
And another MEC Chairman has chosen to leave Envoy for an outside carrier. Looks like ND is heading to JetBlue. Clearly the promise of flow and large sums of cash isn’t working as well as AAG had hoped.
I hope the MEC has done a better job than we did recruiting FO's into union positions. We had been stagnant for so long that the union had the benefit of volunteers with years and years of experience. That isn't the case now, and if they don't start getting FO's involved early, they'll lose all the institutional knowledge that had been accumulated with nobody functional to pass it to except a newbie. |
Originally Posted by Cujo665
(Post 3316065)
I hope the MEC has done a better job than we did recruiting FO's into union positions. We had been stagnant for so long that the union had the benefit of volunteers with years and years of experience. That isn't the case now, and if they don't start getting FO's involved early, they'll lose all the institutional knowledge that had been accumulated with nobody functional to pass it to except a newbie.
|
Originally Posted by pitchattitude
(Post 3316077)
They do a pretty good job if that. Unfortunately there are plenty with no experience, period. Someone who has literally done nothing besides flight instructing prior to being hired doesn’t bring much to the table.
|
Originally Posted by Cujo665
(Post 3316162)
those are exactly the ones to target. That way the effort to teach and train is retained within the union the longest. Lifers are another good choice, but have limits on where you put them since you don’t want too many in leadership decision making as their career objectives are not representative of the majority. They make great committee chairman, grievance committee especially…. Not so much as LEC/MEC members. You need a few for perspective but not too many.
I agree that everyone’s interests needs to be represented but you need to have some maturity to even know what is in your best interest. |
Originally Posted by pitchattitude
(Post 3316185)
you don’t want some young kid who has never had to deal with any kind of management or made significant life decisions trying to represent you when you have a chief pilot or company lawyer up against you.
|
Originally Posted by JustAsking
(Post 3316228)
Maybe, but I don't see all these wise, mature, critical-thinking old guys volunteering.... besides, that if that young kid has the same job as the "old/wise" genius does, maybe he/she is doing something right.
|
Originally Posted by pitchattitude
(Post 3316185)
My point is you don’t want some young kid who has never had to deal with any kind of management or made significant life decisions trying to represent you when you have a chief pilot or company lawyer up against you.
. No, but the new hire young kid is exactly the one to get into a jumpseat committee, P2P volunteer, LEC Grievance committee, ASAP review or other union position where S/he can start learning how to do the internal union stuff. Expense reports, who to contact at the MEC or National, and stuff like that. Start em small and train them to succeed. |
Originally Posted by pitchattitude
(Post 3316236)
No, the lifers are almost all captains and most of the young kids are still FOs. Honestly 1000 hours of 121 time may legally qualify you to be captain but there are plenty that show everyday that they don’t have the maturity. Not that age alone makes you mature. But the lifers are the ones that have figured out their time and energy is better spent on other things.
|
Anybody know what hotel they put you in if you’re in STL for sims?
|
Originally Posted by gbo2
(Post 3317882)
Anybody know what hotel they put you in if you’re in STL for sims?
|
Originally Posted by pitchattitude
(Post 3317888)
Yes. Same one as for overnights. Check company docs.
|
Originally Posted by CLE to IAH
(Post 3320053)
that’s probably more helpful that just saying the Drury inn
HAD to get it out there, eh? Just couldn’t refrain and keep it dl. Smh [emoji2359] Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/briti...8-fpN5F0XQ7voQ
Cost neutral item. Would be nice to get this outdated rule changed. |
Originally Posted by Chato
(Post 3320715)
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/briti...8-fpN5F0XQ7voQ
Cost neutral item. Would be nice to get this outdated rule changed. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:02 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands