Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Retired Airlines > ExpressJet
Will ExpressJet survive this? >

Will ExpressJet survive this?

Search

Notices
ExpressJet Regional Airline

Will ExpressJet survive this?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-07-2020 | 07:11 AM
  #131  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
From: Crew room attendant
Default Will ExpressJet survive this?

Originally Posted by calico
Curious why we are still proceeding with getting the ex TSA ships if Kirby wants to shut us down.

Wanting to be able to dump the 50 seat fleet and getting UAL pilots to agree to the scope changes (more 175’s) to make that happen are two different things. He also never said that he wants to shut XJT down. That’s just the conclusion that everyone is making.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 04-07-2020 | 07:16 AM
  #132  
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,358
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by StuckOnReserve
Wanting to be able to dump the 50 seat fleet and getting UAL pilots to agree to the scope changes (more 175’s) to make that happen are two different things.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Kirby has always wanted Scope relief, and he always will. I think that he was serious about eliminating 50 seat flying, but I don’t think he meant immediately. It will most likely play a part in the initial recovery and then be phased out as we come out of this over the next year or two. He has an option to get more regional rj’s, but he hasn’t exercised it yet. I don’t think that he wants to see anyone shut down, but when they decide to phase out the only aircraft that a company operates, it leaves them with few options.
Reply
Old 04-07-2020 | 07:20 AM
  #133  
ReadOnly7's Avatar
Slam-Clicka
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,585
Likes: 94
Default

Park the 145s
Round up all the UAL-owned 175s and bring them in-house
Merge C5 and XJT
Staple that ist to the UAL list.

All one happy family, no 50-seaters, no scope relief.
Reply
Old 04-07-2020 | 07:27 AM
  #134  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ReadOnly7
Park the 145s
Round up all the UAL-owned 175s and bring them in-house
Merge C5 and XJT
Staple that list to the UAL list.

All one happy family, no 50-seaters, no scope relief.
Yeah, a staple behind all of the furloughed UAL pilots is going to make everyone happy, right?
Reply
Old 04-07-2020 | 07:40 AM
  #135  
ReadOnly7's Avatar
Slam-Clicka
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,585
Likes: 94
Default

Originally Posted by piloto2
Yeah, a staple behind all of the furloughed UAL pilots is going to make everyone happy, right?
it might actually be a way to avoid furloughing.

and no.....there isn’t a way to make everyone happy.
Reply
Old 04-07-2020 | 07:45 AM
  #136  
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,358
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by piloto2
Yeah, a staple behind all of the furloughed UAL pilots is going to make everyone happy, right?
Would you rather have the same outcome and no staple? Unless the recovery is fairly quick, United will most likely retire the 756 and furlough, while operators of 50 seaters go away.
Reply
Old 04-07-2020 | 07:46 AM
  #137  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Default

I am guessing anyone who talks about us being on the UA Seniority list is only joking, if not I would challenge your intellectuality.
Reply
Old 04-07-2020 | 07:53 AM
  #138  
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,358
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by XJTFO
I am guessing anyone who talks about us being on the UA Seniority list is only joking, if not I would challenge your intellectuality.
United has been adamantly against flow, they’ll never go for a staple, even now.
Reply
Old 04-07-2020 | 07:57 AM
  #139  
Grumpyaviator's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,030
Likes: 1
Default

When furloughs are possible mainline pilots talk about “how nice it would be to have you guys on the list”. Otherwise it’s “you’re not good enough to be on our list”.

Happens every time there’s a downturn.
Reply
Old 04-07-2020 | 08:14 AM
  #140  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by XJTFO
I am guessing anyone who talks about us being on the UA Seniority list is only joking, if not I would challenge your intellectuality.
I agree with your statement completely. It would solve their problems though with scope though. Slap everyone on at the bottom of the list in seniority order, and seat lock for 1 year CA and 2 years as an FO with modest regional payrates. I highly doubt any current mainline pilot will be begging for the chance to fly an outdated and cramped aircraft. However, this is a way the lifers still get their cushy schedules/pay, and if they decide to move off that airframe, it’s not like they are displacing anyone on a larger aircraft due to their low seniority. As for everyone else, we were already going to start at the bottom of the list once we moved to that final gig anyways. Oh.. and make all new hires fly the crappy old aircraft first as we have to maintain the “if I had to suffer, you have to suffer too” aviation mentality.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Chrismo01
Delta
17
11-08-2019 05:35 PM
Deez340
Regional
160
05-06-2008 09:41 PM
Nevets
ExpressJet
6
01-15-2008 04:21 AM
Nevets
ExpressJet
44
12-17-2007 09:37 AM
JoeyMeatballs
Regional
35
01-25-2007 04:26 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices