Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo > FedEx
Min guarantee concessions >

Min guarantee concessions

Search
Notices

Min guarantee concessions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-21-2020, 11:54 AM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Squeakygreaser's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 173
Default Min guarantee concessions

It looks like now United in addition to Allegiant management is trying to get a lower min guarantee in exchange for reduced furloughs. From the few people discussing it, it seems like an unpopular idea at both places. At least among the type of people that do forums.

I remember thinking that FedEx did this at some point. Other than that I don't know of any pilot group agreeing to it.

Did FedEx do this? If so how did it shake out?
Would you do it again?

Thanks
Squeakygreaser is offline  
Old 05-21-2020, 12:11 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: FO
Posts: 3,032
Default

Originally Posted by Squeakygreaser View Post
It looks like now United in addition to Allegiant management is trying to get a lower min guarantee in exchange for reduced furloughs. From the few people discussing it, it seems like an unpopular idea at both places. At least among the type of people that do forums.

I remember thinking that FedEx did this at some point. Other than that I don't know of any pilot group agreeing to it.

Did FedEx do this? If so how did it shake out?
Would you do it again?

Thanks
There is a provision in our contract to lower the BLG (that’s what we call guarantee). They did use it, but I wasn’t here when it was used last time so I’ll let someone else answer that.

I believe It has also changed wording wise from the last time it was used, so it may not shake out exactly how it did.
BlueMoon is offline  
Old 05-21-2020, 04:37 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MEMA300's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: Excessed WB Capt.
Posts: 1,063
Default

That was in original 1998 Fedex Pilots Assoc CBA... ALPA would of never put that in a contract, if not already there. When that was implemented we had some guys getting 59 hours of pay and others getting a more regular Bid line gurantee around 72. Guys that were senior could bid carryover and protect themselves.

Not sure if we should keep it.
MEMA300 is offline  
Old 05-21-2020, 04:58 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Sluggo_63's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Posts: 1,273
Default

Originally Posted by MEMA300 View Post
That was in original 1998 Fedex Pilots Assoc CBA... ALPA would of never put that in a contract, if not already there. When that was implemented we had some guys getting 59 hours of pay and others getting a more regular Bid line gurantee around 72. Guys that were senior could bid carryover and protect themselves.

Not sure if we should keep it.
A whole lot of that got fixed after we won the grievance (half won). 4.a.2.c is a lot better than 4.a.2.b. was and put some checks and balances in place to keep from happening what happened in 2008. Let's hope we never have to test it.

I will say as someone who was furloughed from a major after 9/11, if there is going to be a concession to try and save jobs, reducing the guarantee is the way to go versus taking a cut in pay rates. The majors fought forever to get their pay back to even close to what it was pre-9/11.
Sluggo_63 is offline  
Old 05-21-2020, 05:17 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
opt0712's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2012
Posts: 670
Default

Originally Posted by Sluggo_63 View Post
I will say as someone who was furloughed from a major after 9/11, if there is going to be a concession to try and save jobs, reducing the guarantee is the way to go versus taking a cut in pay rates. The majors fought forever to get their pay back to even close to what it was pre-9/11.
This. For all those looking at FedEx for their future landing spot, please heed this advice if 'Rona is to come for us.
opt0712 is offline  
Old 05-21-2020, 05:39 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: FO
Posts: 3,032
Default

Originally Posted by Sluggo_63 View Post
A whole lot of that got fixed after we won the grievance (half won). 4.a.2.c is a lot better than 4.a.2.b. was and put some checks and balances in place to keep from happening what happened in 2008. Let's hope we never have to test it.

I will say as someone who was furloughed from a major after 9/11, if there is going to be a concession to try and save jobs, reducing the guarantee is the way to go versus taking a cut in pay rates. The majors fought forever to get their pay back to even close to what it was pre-9/11.
Yep, Work Less, not Work For Less.
BlueMoon is offline  
Old 05-21-2020, 06:34 PM
  #7  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2018
Posts: 1,838
Default

A reduced line guarantee isn't even unique to FedEx anymore with many of the majors/LCC's voluntarily doing it. Numerous airlines with pilots taking lower line credits and early retirements with lower line credits till they hit 65. This is what our 4.A.2.c is. It has a bunch of gates that have to be met and then they have to offer early retirement packages/LOA's and then they can lower the monthly guarantee with a lot of strings attached. As someone else said work less not for less and make sure other provisions are offered by the company prior to reduced line guarantees such as our CBA has.
Noworkallplay is offline  
Old 05-22-2020, 03:47 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2019
Posts: 1,027
Default

Originally Posted by MEMA300 View Post
That was in original 1998 Fedex Pilots Assoc CBA... ALPA would of never put that in a contract, if not already there. When that was implemented we had some guys getting 59 hours of pay and others getting a more regular Bid line gurantee around 72. Guys that were senior could bid carryover and protect themselves.

Not sure if we should keep it.
MEC members didn't lose a dime. It was proposed the board take a cut and share the pain, the board didn't take a cut.
Full pay for them while the rest took a hit.
Stan446 is offline  
Old 05-22-2020, 05:28 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
HIFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: 777 Captain in Training
Posts: 1,457
Default

Originally Posted by Stan446 View Post
MEC members didn't lose a dime. It was proposed the board take a cut and share the pain, the board didn't take a cut.
Full pay for them while the rest took a hit.
Just to be fair to everyone it was the MEC Officers not the entire MEC. The officers are paid a salary of a set amount the rest of the MEC “the reps”get paid thier line award.
HIFLYR is offline  
Old 05-22-2020, 06:49 AM
  #10  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2019
Posts: 44
Default

Originally Posted by Stan446 View Post
MEC members didn't lose a dime. It was proposed the board take a cut and share the pain, the board didn't take a cut.
Full pay for them while the rest took a hit.
Not surprised. ALPA is so corrupt. Wish more people realized this.
cargoforlife is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SureJetz
ExpressJet
14
09-02-2019 12:19 PM
Flea Bite
Major
10
05-15-2015 01:19 PM
Da40Pilot
Regional
59
01-13-2015 07:20 AM
viperdriver
Cargo
4
11-25-2010 06:56 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
05-26-2005 03:25 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices