Notices

Delta’s New Pay Scale

Old 03-17-2023 | 06:52 AM
  #201  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,813
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by coryk
Ha! Totally clueless. But thanks for the characterizations.

I made more last year than any of my previous years, sure. But I also got involuntarily extended more than I would have liked. RE: work rules.

Codifying scope language does in fact look out for the betterment of this entire pilot group. If you can’t see that, then you’re delusional. Or you’re on your way out, and dgaf.

This contract is riddled with holes. Why not improve them? People are faced with stagnation, loss of flying, closures of their base, retirement of their fleet. QOL and work rules are paramount.

A “fix” (whatever that means) to retirement means nothing. It’s a band-aide. A former block rep once told me “if we fix it, we’ll never have to negotiate retirement again.” What kind of garbage nonsense is that? Of course you will. You can sit there and pout all you want, but the fact is there are a lot of new people here with many many years to go. They value negotiation capital spent on work rules over anything else.

Well then, let's go to the tape.

Originally Posted by coryk
FedEx year 5/6 757 captain, Europe-based. 3 months of training at the beginning of the year.

300k gross
26k DC
35k foreign-domicile housing allowance

361k total

1115 credit hours
150 block hours
54 landings
~12 days away from home a month

Took all my vacation (18 days x 6hrs a day), didn't pick up an extra flying, had a little extra pay for recruiting work, saw a lot of Europe.
Hmm, 3 months in training at the beginning of the year at WB FO pay, then 5/6 year NB captain pay. No mention of extensions. Took all of your vacation, yet somehow managed 1115 credit hours.

Now a few more blasts from the past.

Originally Posted by coryk
FDX, can reserve JS 21 days out. Protected if you’re company mental going into a trip with a couple exceptions like duty day, international trip.

But most of us who commute just bid and fly deadhead trips with paid tickets to/from the trip.

If you’re going to commute, there’s no other place you should consider.

Commuted at UAL as well, that on the other hand was absurd. Seniority based JS until time of departure was crazy to me.
Originally Posted by coryk
Fine by me. Easier airports to get in and out of, quiet downtown layovers. + seniority... I took all of June off for vacation.
Originally Posted by coryk
I can attest to that. Flying BNA-IND-BNA all week. Hotel pick up at 2230, 40 min flight to Indy and there by 1am local, 1.5hr nap, 40 min flight back in BNA and in bed by 0530. 7 hours door to door with a nap in the middle. Doesn't get much easier than that for the nighttime freight dawg.
No, I think I'll stick with my original opinion for your intentions.
Reply
Old 03-17-2023 | 06:56 AM
  #202  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,813
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by UnusualAttitude
To my knowledge the results of that survey have not been released to the pilot group. I’m not an MEC insider like you, since you have seen the survey results you must be an ALPA associate with executive session access or access to information protected by an NDA.

For the record, changing my username in some attempt to hurt my feelings on a web board isn’t going to work and for your own sake I would mention that it’s an ineffective tool for advancing an argument. This is business to me. Nothing more, nothing less. If protecting Purple pilot jobs is somehow not something that interests you, so be it.

Concessions in Section 11 and 25 exist, they’ll be called a “choice” but it’s concession from current language. Confirmed by an ALPA rep.

Come on now, you can call me ignorant to advance an argument, but changing your user name is off limits. So, which rep is disclosing executive session information? Did they tell you the concessions in sections 11 and 25? The MEC stated that after the survey, they were assured the goals hadn't changed, or something like that.
Reply
Old 03-17-2023 | 07:03 AM
  #203  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 864
Likes: 50
From: B767
Default

Originally Posted by pinseeker
Come on now, you can call me ignorant to advance an argument, but changing your user name is off limits. So, which rep is disclosing executive session information? Did they tell you the concessions in sections 11 and 25? The MEC stated that after the survey, they were assured the goals hadn't changed, or something like that.
I didn’t say changing my username or name calling was off limits, just ineffective to advancing your argument or position. I assure you, I have been called way worse and I’ve got thick skin. I feel silly for even responding to this so that’s the last post on the subject from me.
Reply
Old 03-17-2023 | 07:21 AM
  #204  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 11
Default

Originally Posted by pinseeker
Well then, let's go to the tape.



Hmm, 3 months in training at the beginning of the year at WB FO pay, then 5/6 year NB captain pay. No mention of extensions. Took all of your vacation, yet somehow managed 1115 credit hours.

Now a few more blasts from the past.







No, I think I'll stick with my original opinion for your intentions.
Nice job. You can use the search function. Next task is AirDrop. What’s your point?

There are some great things we are able to do, there’s no denying that. But that shouldn’t be a reason to stick your head in the sand and ignore the other parts that are severely lacking and pose significant threats to everyone on this seniority list.

4 years ago when I was DHing to BNA, we didn’t have 30 purple painted 737’s on our Paris ramp doing flying that was just recently flown by FedEx pilots. And our CEO wasn’t giving interviews about the company utilizing more 3rd party lift to fly FedEx freight.

Times change. Opinions change. Priorities… they change. It’s called pattern bargaining for a reason. Why is it so difficult to understand this concept?

Last edited by coryk; 03-17-2023 at 07:42 AM.
Reply
Old 03-17-2023 | 07:21 AM
  #205  
FDX1's Avatar
Contract 2021
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 453
Likes: 4
From: 777 - Both
Red face

Originally Posted by pinseeker
Well then, let's go to the tape.



Hmm, 3 months in training at the beginning of the year at WB FO pay, then 5/6 year NB captain pay. No mention of extensions. Took all of your vacation, yet somehow managed 1115 credit hours.

Now a few more blasts from the past.







No, I think I'll stick with my original opinion for your intentions.
Best APC mic drop I have ever seen! The past just might come back to haunt you.
Reply
Old 03-17-2023 | 07:22 AM
  #206  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,201
Likes: 32
From: 4A2FU
Default

Originally Posted by pinseeker
No, the surveys showed that the pilot group wanted focused negotiations and did not want to open many sections. One year ago, the surveys showed the same thing.
no they didn’t. We’ve only been surveyed once in the last two years and that was 3 months ago. They still haven’t posted the results, and if I recall correctly, they didn’t even have scope as an option or discussion point available in the survey unless you wrote it in.
Reply
Old 03-17-2023 | 10:37 AM
  #207  
CloudSailor's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,097
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by threeighteen
no they didn’t. We’ve only been surveyed once in the last two years and that was 3 months ago. They still haven’t posted the results, and if I recall correctly, they didn’t even have scope as an option or discussion point available in the survey unless you wrote it in.
Who cares who is to blame, right? Sure, it is our fault as line pilots for not polling properly, that we did not foresee the things that MEC Union Leadership should foresee when it comes to protecting our jobs. Fine, I'll take the blame, as long as FDX ALPA wakes up now to the issue of Scope. This round of negotiations. Not Next.

We need to use all options to get back to the table asap and open Section 1, along with deleting our concessionary language - which has not been sent to a TA yet. New industry standards have been set in pattern bargaining, and we are still in open negotiations. We should use the opportunity we have received in our favor. By that I mean we did not have a TA last year with the company's best offer then, it could have passed and would have sucked.

The Company is suddenly **** poor after how many years of record profits, stock buybacks, etc...? I don't think so.
Reply
Old 03-17-2023 | 01:22 PM
  #208  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,201
Likes: 32
From: 4A2FU
Default

Originally Posted by oncewasgood
I find it hard to believe the blame lies with the union on not achieving the May 1 year “goal”. That lies in the companies basket. To say otherwise would indicate you are on the companies side. Only two sides in negotiations What side are you on? Do you think the company was offering things acceptable to us in May 2022? Let’s point fingers in the proper direction at the company not at each other.
regardless of who is at fault… the targeted approach did not work, and the negotiating landscape has changed in the last 9-10 months. To not change our ask to reflect both of those developments is not representing our pilot group well.
Reply
Old 03-17-2023 | 02:19 PM
  #209  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,201
Likes: 32
From: 4A2FU
Default

Originally Posted by oncewasgood
I’m not an expert on this subject, but I find it hard to believe you could walk in and completely change everything and not have a negative outcome with the NMB.
I mean it worked for Delta just a few months ago with the NMB mediator...

We negotiated in good faith, the company didn't. We have a pretty big leg to stand on when it comes to the NMB.
Reply
Old 03-17-2023 | 02:30 PM
  #210  
Viper25's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,470
Likes: 304
Default

Originally Posted by threeighteen
I mean it worked for Delta just a few months ago with the NMB mediator...

We negotiated in good faith, the company didn't. We have a pretty big leg to stand on when it comes to the NMB.
Question as a pax guy on the outside looking in. Can cargo use pattern bargaining off of pax? I’ve been told by reps that the NMB doesn’t allow pax to pattern off of cargo. Curious if you’ve heard about it the other way around.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gzsg
Delta
10297
07-10-2015 01:42 PM
P-3Bubba
Major
174
04-23-2014 06:14 AM
FalconDrvr
Regional
14
02-14-2013 12:52 PM
FalconDrvr
Cargo
4
02-14-2013 10:00 AM
Metal121
Major
20
02-04-2008 08:31 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices