New Rumors
#62
The point is that it’s the company that’s refused to make a reasonable agreement for 4 YEARS!! It’s
not oh this guy did this or this group is like that. Our peers have ZOOMED past us in scope, QOL, RETIREMENT AND PAY PAY PAY. But keep pointing fingers at ourselves. Management union busting success 101.
-Bubs
not oh this guy did this or this group is like that. Our peers have ZOOMED past us in scope, QOL, RETIREMENT AND PAY PAY PAY. But keep pointing fingers at ourselves. Management union busting success 101.
-Bubs
#63
Outdated. Again.
RJ usage has plummeted. Global scope deal in the latest contract has strong protections and remediations for noncompliance. Yes there’s some RJs and there’s codesharing. Now with global scope, any increase in codesharing will cause a required increase in DL widebody pilot jobs.
Wtf do you expect a “good” scope clause to have? Zero RJs and and Zero codeshares? wtf planet do you live on dude. The scope is good. It wasn’t always good. You live in the past and don’t keep up with changes. (BTW The global scope LOA was passed unanimously by the DL MEC and voted in by 90% in favor of the pilots. It is revolutionary).
Feel free to go on the DL forums and ask how much RJ usage has decreased relative to the past several decades. Your anecdotes of “seeing” a bunch of RJs on the ramp are meaningless.
RJ usage has plummeted. Global scope deal in the latest contract has strong protections and remediations for noncompliance. Yes there’s some RJs and there’s codesharing. Now with global scope, any increase in codesharing will cause a required increase in DL widebody pilot jobs.
Wtf do you expect a “good” scope clause to have? Zero RJs and and Zero codeshares? wtf planet do you live on dude. The scope is good. It wasn’t always good. You live in the past and don’t keep up with changes. (BTW The global scope LOA was passed unanimously by the DL MEC and voted in by 90% in favor of the pilots. It is revolutionary).
Feel free to go on the DL forums and ask how much RJ usage has decreased relative to the past several decades. Your anecdotes of “seeing” a bunch of RJs on the ramp are meaningless.
#64
On Reserve
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 176
Likes: 6
Yup. Keep voting no. 2015 TA will stay in action to 2035. It’s been 2 years and they’re offering less than 2023. And they can. Cause they can. The reality is this company blows. They don’t give a $heet about anyone or anything. The mistake was buying into the line of nonsense. Best job in aviation. Pathetic. We’ll look like fools when UPS signs $500/hr and we’re still on 2015 rates. FedSux wins again.
-Bubs
-Bubs
#65
Banned
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 1,244
Likes: 0
I threw out my FedEx water bottle which we were gifted in HF. It was high quality and I used it frequently, but I dislike this place so much now, permanently, that I do not wish to be seen with company merch in public or be reminded of where I work. Especially during time off.
#67
Line Holder
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 445
Likes: 100
False. American has the least widebodies.
#68
Line Holder
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,357
Likes: 133
Outdated. Again.
RJ usage has plummeted. Global scope deal in the latest contract has strong protections and remediations for noncompliance. Yes there’s some RJs and there’s codesharing. Now with global scope, any increase in codesharing will cause a required increase in DL widebody pilot jobs.
Wtf do you expect a “good” scope clause to have? Zero RJs and and Zero codeshares? wtf planet do you live on dude. The scope is good. It wasn’t always good. You live in the past and don’t keep up with changes. (BTW The global scope LOA was passed unanimously by the DL MEC and voted in by 90% in favor of the pilots. It is revolutionary).
Feel free to go on the DL forums and ask how much RJ usage has decreased relative to the past several decades. Your anecdotes of “seeing” a bunch of RJs on the ramp are meaningless.
RJ usage has plummeted. Global scope deal in the latest contract has strong protections and remediations for noncompliance. Yes there’s some RJs and there’s codesharing. Now with global scope, any increase in codesharing will cause a required increase in DL widebody pilot jobs.
Wtf do you expect a “good” scope clause to have? Zero RJs and and Zero codeshares? wtf planet do you live on dude. The scope is good. It wasn’t always good. You live in the past and don’t keep up with changes. (BTW The global scope LOA was passed unanimously by the DL MEC and voted in by 90% in favor of the pilots. It is revolutionary).
Feel free to go on the DL forums and ask how much RJ usage has decreased relative to the past several decades. Your anecdotes of “seeing” a bunch of RJs on the ramp are meaningless.
I bet FedEx would jump at that awesome scope similar to Deltas codeshare. Instead of getting the 10 777 they announced we could be like delta and get 5 then wetlease out the other five. Because we would be adding more widebody seats. Hahaha
Your nose is so far up deltas a.. you can’t even think straight.
#69
Don’t look at all the RJ’s on the ramp is meaningless, that is the funniest thing I have heard in a while. Yes they have less total RJ’s but they have ERJ170,190 now instead of CRJ 50.
I bet FedEx would jump at that awesome scope similar to Deltas codeshare. Instead of getting the 10 777 they announced we could be like delta and get 5 then wetlease out the other five. Because we would be adding more widebody seats. Hahaha
Your nose is so far up deltas a.. you can’t even think straight.
I bet FedEx would jump at that awesome scope similar to Deltas codeshare. Instead of getting the 10 777 they announced we could be like delta and get 5 then wetlease out the other five. Because we would be adding more widebody seats. Hahaha
Your nose is so far up deltas a.. you can’t even think straight.
#70
Line Holder
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,357
Likes: 133
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



