FedEx Hiring
#3122
Layover Master
Joined APC: Jan 2013
Position: Seated
Posts: 4,309
#3123
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,926
Again. Global uses a fee to import all hours, employment, and education to each airline. If you want to be cheap and have a lot of time on your hands. Then you can individually imput all hours, employment, and education for free for each airline.
#3124
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Posts: 121
I’ve heard the global can create errors on each airlines Pilot Credentials. So I’d be cautious relying on the global push to all feature.
#3125
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,926
#3126
China Visa Applicant
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: IPZ to Mr.
Posts: 1,915
So I found that sometimes the information got a little jumbled in the porting between global and the individual airlines. Nothing serious, but the aircraft type names might get changed or dropped off, or some other little nuisance thing.
Eventually I just stopped updating the global site and re-porting the data, and instead individually updating the info on the individual sites.
If I had it to do over again, I wouldn't bother with the global site.
#3127
Chemtrail Dispenser..
Joined APC: Apr 2015
Posts: 290
It isn't that it "creates errors", but that the way hours and aircraft types are tallied on the global site is different compared to how each of the airlines does it on the AA, SWA, and FX sites.
So I found that sometimes the information got a little jumbled in the porting between global and the individual airlines. Nothing serious, but the aircraft type names might get changed or dropped off, or some other little nuisance thing.
Eventually I just stopped updating the global site and re-porting the data, and instead individually updating the info on the individual sites.
If I had it to do over again, I wouldn't bother with the global site.
So I found that sometimes the information got a little jumbled in the porting between global and the individual airlines. Nothing serious, but the aircraft type names might get changed or dropped off, or some other little nuisance thing.
Eventually I just stopped updating the global site and re-porting the data, and instead individually updating the info on the individual sites.
If I had it to do over again, I wouldn't bother with the global site.
#3130
It isn't that it "creates errors", but that the way hours and aircraft types are tallied on the global site is different compared to how each of the airlines does it on the AA, SWA, and FX sites.
So I found that sometimes the information got a little jumbled in the porting between global and the individual airlines. Nothing serious, but the aircraft type names might get changed or dropped off, or some other little nuisance thing.
Eventually I just stopped updating the global site and re-porting the data, and instead individually updating the info on the individual sites.
If I had it to do over again, I wouldn't bother with the global site.
So I found that sometimes the information got a little jumbled in the porting between global and the individual airlines. Nothing serious, but the aircraft type names might get changed or dropped off, or some other little nuisance thing.
Eventually I just stopped updating the global site and re-porting the data, and instead individually updating the info on the individual sites.
If I had it to do over again, I wouldn't bother with the global site.
The global function for PilotCredentials is not worth your time and money. I individually updated each too every month, and it was like a part time job. But I knew my data was correct.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post