FDX-Fruitful Week?
#201
#202
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
No need for that foolishness Tony, we can just hire off the street and pump out a new 75/76 FO in….ah…um….apparently 6-8 months. (Never mind….)
Many of this board went to the RAG, became a Navy fighter pilot, and got CQ'd in less time than that. Our F-15 syllabus ran just a bit under 6 months on the AF side of things. I think C-17 school is less than 6 months for a new guy as well.
We need sims, instructors, leadership…and a lot more than just a contract to fix all of this. I hope we get all of it.
Many of this board went to the RAG, became a Navy fighter pilot, and got CQ'd in less time than that. Our F-15 syllabus ran just a bit under 6 months on the AF side of things. I think C-17 school is less than 6 months for a new guy as well.
We need sims, instructors, leadership…and a lot more than just a contract to fix all of this. I hope we get all of it.
#203
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,047
Likes: 0
From: 767 FO
Did you tell him he will be cleaning up on E3 pay for those 4 months?
#204
Yes but you have to learn how to fill out the catering forms. In the 767 pipeline you have to also learn where the popcorn machine is and the proper etiquette to acquire a sleep room.
#206
Gentlemen, welcome yet another low information voter to our forums.
#207
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Nice. I guess you listen to the superfluous piffle that babbling twits like the diesel mechanic Rachel Maddow and mouthpiece Keith Olbermann spew, coming straight off the "democratic" party's daily talking points for news then?
Gentlemen, welcome yet another low information voter to our forums.
Gentlemen, welcome yet another low information voter to our forums.
Apologize for the churn on this forum, but I had to laugh when the original post referenced reporting "like fox News", because of their proven and documented inaccuracies, and biases. The thread was on the TA, and in principle we should all want the same from our union leadership, the unvarnished truth of the TA contents and ramifications, and the delta from our current contract. Also a "realistic" appraisal, understanding and awareness of what is, and isn't achievable in further negotiations.
You're unfounded characterization of "low info voter" couldn't be further from the truth. I do quite a bit of daily in depth reading, and can clearly recognize the inaccuracies of that network, with detailed knowledge garnered from sources listed above.
If you were truly informed and had an unbiased multi-referenced understanding of the detail, depth and nuance of today's issues you might recognize the disparities as well. But if that's too much, Google "fox news inaccuracies" and read for yourself. You'll find that studies from Stanford, University of Maryland, Farleigh Dickinson, Pew Research Center, Kaiser Family Foundation, and more have come to the same conclusion, their viewers are more likely to be misinformed on specific issues when compared to viewers of comparable media, and the biased reporting.
Again- back on topic, we want an unbiased dessemination of the TA contents and changes. We can all agree on that.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




