Search

Notices

News thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-20-2025 | 09:14 AM
  #641  
Thread Starter
Almost there
 
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 2,011
Likes: 144
Default

Originally Posted by VisionWings
we made 1 billion in revenue. That’s super easy math to 400 million. I was referring to the raise in fare price from current average ticket price which was listed in our q4 filing. If you want to check you can compare the average fare price over at the big three see if it runs around 164$/ticket
I have no qualms with your ticket price or revenue number. But you’re equating a 40% raise to that total revenue not total pilot costs. And you are using a per quarter revenue. Unless I have misunderstood you again? I feel like I am just misreading your math somehow.


My math…

Pilots make up 28% of our workforce. Frontiers total salary costs last year totaled 954M. It’s impossible to get to 400M per quarter with a 40% raise based on those numbers.

Let’s just say pilots cost 500M per year for easy math. And let’s give our contract a 50% raise after all benefits are computed again for easy math. Thats only a $250M hit for the whole YEAR.

So 3.775B plus 250M = 4.025B in revenue required to have the same 80M profit. Divide that 4.025B in revenue by the 33.3M passengers we carried and you get $120.88 per passenger.

$7 change from the current ticket price. That doesn’t include the benefit of having more airplanes, more passengers, with more mature markets, with a revamped route network…all things Barry literally said yesterday. He also has mentioned reaching 5B in revenue very soon.


All math comes off of recently filed 10K
Reply
Old 02-20-2025 | 09:20 AM
  #642  
redhot's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2024
Posts: 203
Likes: 18
Default

Originally Posted by VisionWings
even on this document it’s 114$/ ticket+ancillaries.
the q4 average was 117$/ticket+ ancillaries.

Based on the fact we can’t actually cover our unit cost with the ticket price alone. Just look at our profit and loss over the last few years to see that. We need the ancillaries or a higher fare price. We take advantage of reduced taxes on ancillaries compared to ticket price to help boost profit. But we still need that extra 71$/ticket per passenger just to get a little bit of profit.

credit card $$ is where there is a ton of growth to come with profitability with Frontier. In the 4th quarter they saw an increase of 25% in credit card acquisitions along with 10% higher spend. As they add first class product this will continue to go up because unlike Delta’s Skypesos you will actually be able to get upgraded regularly on Frontier.

Our loyalty program is like 1% the size of United or Delta, so even if we can increase that by 7% it’s hundreds of millions of dollars of profit on an annual basis

point is, just like how the legacy’s copied the ULCC’s in basic economy the same is about to happen in reverse with premium and credit cards.

Will be as successful? Probably not, but will it be good enough to produce 10% profits for Fromtier long term, yes I do think that.
Reply
Old 02-20-2025 | 09:27 AM
  #643  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,986
Likes: 112
From: Lineholder
Default

Originally Posted by VisionWings
even on this document it’s 114$/ ticket+ancillaries.
the q4 average was 117$/ticket+ ancillaries.

Based on the fact we can’t actually cover our unit cost with the ticket price alone. Just look at our profit and loss over the last few years to see that. We need the ancillaries or a higher fare price. We take advantage of reduced taxes on ancillaries compared to ticket price to help boost profit. But we still need that extra 71$/ticket per passenger just to get a little bit of profit.
Huh?

In order to determine the amount of additional TICKET price needed (not ticket and ancillary but JUST ticket), we need to know the actual ticket (fare) revenue per passenger. It was about $44.

Now, we need to know how many passengers we carried. It was about 33.2M. That math comes to 1,460M in just FARE revenue. Raising the fare price by $10 would raise revenue to 1,792M or a difference of 332.8M.

There were 2202 pilots on payroll as of Dec 31, 2024. We don't have good #s of what PILOT salary costs were but if we use an average yearly salary of $250k, that cost is estimated at 550.5M. Adding another 40% would grow that to 770.7M. The difference would be 220.2M.

A $10 fare increase would more than cover the additional cost of the labor (this doesn't include additional 401k, increases due to additional vacation weeks, etc). And it ASSUMES that we'd carry at least the same # of passengers - according to BB, that wouldn't happen w/ a fare increase...

Last edited by dracir1; 02-20-2025 at 09:42 AM.
Reply
Old 02-20-2025 | 09:29 AM
  #644  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,986
Likes: 112
From: Lineholder
Default

Originally Posted by Stayontarget
I have no qualms with your ticket price or revenue number. But you’re equating a 40% raise to that total revenue not total pilot costs. And you are using a per quarter revenue. Unless I have misunderstood you again? I feel like I am just misreading your math somehow.


My math…

Pilots make up 28% of our workforce. Frontiers total salary costs last year totaled 954M. It’s impossible to get to 400M per quarter with a 40% raise based on those numbers.

Let’s just say pilots cost 500M per year for easy math. And let’s give our contract a 50% raise after all benefits are computed again for easy math. Thats only a $250M hit for the whole YEAR.

So 3.775B plus 250M = 4.025B in revenue required to have the same 80M profit. Divide that 4.025B in revenue by the 33.3M passengers we carried and you get $120.88 per passenger.

$7 change from the current ticket price. That doesn’t include the benefit of having more airplanes, more passengers, with more mature markets, with a revamped route network…all things Barry literally said yesterday. He also has mentioned reaching 5B in revenue very soon.


All math comes off of recently filed 10K
Yes, my math jives w/ yours for the most part (post above).

Last edited by dracir1; 02-20-2025 at 09:42 AM.
Reply
Old 02-21-2025 | 09:01 AM
  #645  
Thread Starter
Almost there
 
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 2,011
Likes: 144
Default

Originally Posted by BobSacamano
Sounded a lot more positive than I recall last year’s Barclays call being. I actually thought there a were some hopeful/positive inferences to be drawn from the segment on the pilot contract.

Thanks for sharing.
I found his push for M&A at the end interesting. It’s almost like he expects dominoes to fall with every small carrier getting scooped up. Or maybe he is just giving bond holders and shareholders a little more nudge to look at Frontier again? Should be interesting times in the industry.
Reply
Old 02-21-2025 | 07:22 PM
  #646  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 369
Likes: 10
Default

I appreciated biffle not being afraid to say where the industry is headed.

im just curious when all this consolidation is going to begin.
Reply
Old 02-22-2025 | 08:33 AM
  #647  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 129
Likes: 2
From: Airbus (the wide ones)
Default

Originally Posted by DrSmacFum
I appreciated biffle not being afraid to say where the industry is headed.

im just curious when all this consolidation is going to begin.
There’s a video of Frankie at some conference, saying the same thing about consolidation probably from about five years ago. They’ve always been preaching consolidation, but still yet to see it come to fruition with the exception of Alaska’s acquisitions.
Reply
Old 02-22-2025 | 10:43 AM
  #648  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 3,764
Likes: 115
From: 1900D CA
Default

Originally Posted by doz4dllrs
There’s a video of Frankie at some conference, saying the same thing about consolidation probably from about five years ago. They’ve always been preaching consolidation, but still yet to see it come to fruition with the exception of Alaska’s acquisitions.
Well it's not from a lack of trying!!
Reply
Old 02-24-2025 | 11:59 AM
  #649  
Thread Starter
Almost there
 
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 2,011
Likes: 144
Default

Originally Posted by Aero1900
Well it's not from a lack of trying!!
Barry also mentioned trying to connect to an international network alliance within two years. I figured that was in our future until we cancelled the 321XLR option. Seems counter productive.

Maybe they will try and hookup with Wizz with Norse being an intermediary?
Reply
Old 03-04-2025 | 10:52 AM
  #650  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,600
Likes: 33
Default

Originally Posted by Stayontarget
Barry also mentioned trying to connect to an international network alliance within two years. I figured that was in our future until we cancelled the 321XLR option. Seems counter productive.

Maybe they will try and hookup with Wizz with Norse being an intermediary?
Or maybe spirit.

It’s behind a paywall but Franke is still going on about it.

https://aviationweek.com/air-transpo...olution-spirit
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
kuma66
Air Wisconsin
3
04-21-2019 03:11 AM
Planetrain
Delta
90
10-27-2018 08:45 PM
iahflyr
SkyWest
1273
08-27-2017 03:46 AM
Bocaflyer
Fractional
26
06-26-2007 09:13 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices