How long for a contract?
#1091
On Reserve
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 135
Likes: 8
[QUOTE=Hedley;3878670]Not necessarily. You maintain your respective contracts until after the JCBA is completed. Once the JCBA is agreed to, both sides are then paid according to the new contract. When the SLI is subsequently completed, the two groups can begin to play together.
In the case of the UAL/CAL merger, it was announced in 2010, JCBA completed in 2012, and the SLI finalized in 2013.[/
You are incorrect. They will have to so there is no growth on the lower paid airline over the one that is paid more. It’s called leveling up. Everything else is correct. I have been through one. As far as seniority. You can most likely expect relative seniority +or- 1 percent.
In the case of the UAL/CAL merger, it was announced in 2010, JCBA completed in 2012, and the SLI finalized in 2013.[/
You are incorrect. They will have to so there is no growth on the lower paid airline over the one that is paid more. It’s called leveling up. Everything else is correct. I have been through one. As far as seniority. You can most likely expect relative seniority +or- 1 percent.
#1092
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 3,749
Likes: 99
From: 1900D CA
[QUOTE=Flyhigh44;3878731]
I'll have to go back to read some of the merger language in our contract. I know there's some stuff in there to prevent "whipsaw" where the company can use two pilot groups against eachother but I don't know about a requirement for them to match pay. I guess I'll be reading that tomorrow in cruise.
Not necessarily. You maintain your respective contracts until after the JCBA is completed. Once the JCBA is agreed to, both sides are then paid according to the new contract. When the SLI is subsequently completed, the two groups can begin to play together.
In the case of the UAL/CAL merger, it was announced in 2010, JCBA completed in 2012, and the SLI finalized in 2013.[/
You are incorrect. They will have to so there is no growth on the lower paid airline over the one that is paid more. It’s called leveling up. Everything else is correct. I have been through one. As far as seniority. You can most likely expect relative seniority +or- 1 percent.
In the case of the UAL/CAL merger, it was announced in 2010, JCBA completed in 2012, and the SLI finalized in 2013.[/
You are incorrect. They will have to so there is no growth on the lower paid airline over the one that is paid more. It’s called leveling up. Everything else is correct. I have been through one. As far as seniority. You can most likely expect relative seniority +or- 1 percent.
#1093
Stirring the pot
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,608
Likes: 63
From: Off reserve 🤫
Spirit is NOT going to happen....... how long do we "realistically" wait to ask to be released......
we all know the company will never come to the table with any intention of any agreement.
we all know the company will never come to the table with any intention of any agreement.
#1094
FO For Life
Joined: Jan 2024
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
#1095
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,653
Likes: 106
You are incorrect. They will have to so there is no growth on the lower paid airline over the one that is paid more. It’s called leveling up. Everything else is correct. I have been through one. As far as seniority. You can most likely expect relative seniority +or- 1 percent.
In the CAL/UAL case it turns out that wasn't applicable. CAL was hiring and had a slightly higher paying contract while UAL had people on furlough. Once the merger was announced, CAL didn't want to hire off the street with UAL pilots on furlough but couldn't legally recall pilots on another list at that point. The two unions worked out an agreement where furloughed pilots could be "hired" by CAL, they started at the bottom of the list but weren't probationary pilots and were started out at their pay longevity at the time of their furlough. It was a voluntary program and when the SLI came out everyone moved to their appropriate slot. Not really relevant to this potential deal, but it's just an interesting piece of airline history.
#1096
Line Holder
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
[QUOTE=Flyhigh44;3878731]
You are incorrect. They will have to so there is no growth on the lower paid airline over the one that is paid more. It’s called leveling up. Everything else is correct. I have been through one. As far as seniority. You can most likely expect relative seniority +or- 1 percent.
There is no legal requirement (RLA) for a "level up". Could the company offer to do so, sure. Will Indigo voluntarily offer to increase pay. No. Regarding IMSL, it will not be relative seniority +/-1%. One airline entity is marginally profitable, hiring new hires monthly and has zero long term debt other than aircraft orders. The other was running -30% net margins, is currently operating under bankruptcy protections, still has over $3 billion in long term debt, has sold every airplane that had equity to pay operating expenses, and is furloughing/downgrading. The only two similiar qualities shared by NK and F9 is we both fly airbus and we both suck at virtually every operational and qol metric. Its the equivalent of two porta-potty cleaning companies merging...we may merge and the result will be a bigger organization, but every day at work will still be a complete sh1tshow, literally.
You are incorrect. They will have to so there is no growth on the lower paid airline over the one that is paid more. It’s called leveling up. Everything else is correct. I have been through one. As far as seniority. You can most likely expect relative seniority +or- 1 percent.
#1099
Stirring the pot
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,608
Likes: 63
From: Off reserve 🤫
Lastly....
indigo is a holding company. They just happen to fly airplanes. Their whole livelihood is based on a spreadsheet, keeping it in the black. Why would they undergo a purchase of a larger company whose spreadsheet is completely in the red with no hopes of getting above board? where are they going to cut costs flight crew? cabin crew
? gate agents ? ramp crew? they're already running so short as it is above and below wing.
indigo is a holding company. They just happen to fly airplanes. Their whole livelihood is based on a spreadsheet, keeping it in the black. Why would they undergo a purchase of a larger company whose spreadsheet is completely in the red with no hopes of getting above board? where are they going to cut costs flight crew? cabin crew
? gate agents ? ramp crew? they're already running so short as it is above and below wing.
#1100
Line Holder
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 494
Likes: 3
Lastly....
indigo is a holding company. They just happen to fly airplanes. Their whole livelihood is based on a spreadsheet, keeping it in the black. Why would they undergo a purchase of a larger company whose spreadsheet is completely in the red with no hopes of getting above board? where are they going to cut costs flight crew? cabin crew
? gate agents ? ramp crew? they're already running so short as it is above and below wing.
indigo is a holding company. They just happen to fly airplanes. Their whole livelihood is based on a spreadsheet, keeping it in the black. Why would they undergo a purchase of a larger company whose spreadsheet is completely in the red with no hopes of getting above board? where are they going to cut costs flight crew? cabin crew
? gate agents ? ramp crew? they're already running so short as it is above and below wing.
My guess is you'll hear something soon, or something not soon.
Just my opinion. I don't see them breaking the bank to do it.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



