Some perspective on what we do
#42
Line Holder
Joined: Nov 2024
Posts: 425
Likes: 78
itz more interesting that he needed AI to tell him f9 and delta have different different profit margins, revenue, and market positions. Like no **** Sherlock. We also have different crew bases too. Did you need AI to point that out to you as well? Hats vs no hats?
#44
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,943
Likes: 95
From: Lineholder
This is the answer Grok gave. Remember Grok is an AI and doesn't have an agenda (we hope) and no emotional connection to either argument.
Several factors could justify a Delta Airlines pilot flying an A320 earning more than a Frontier Airlines pilot flying the same aircraft:
Several factors could justify a Delta Airlines pilot flying an A320 earning more than a Frontier Airlines pilot flying the same aircraft:
- Career Trajectory and Pilot Retention: Delta is often a destination airline for pilots, attracting seasoned aviators who see it as a long-term career goal with higher pay and stability. In contrast, Frontier operates as a mid-tier, stepping-stone airline, where many pilots—especially younger ones—gain experience before moving to top-tier carriers like United, American, or Delta. This dynamic means Delta tends to employ pilots who’ve reached a career pinnacle, while Frontier’s workforce includes less senior pilots, impacting pay scales.
- Company Revenue and Profitability: Delta generates significantly higher revenue and operates on a larger scale than Frontier. This financial capacity allows Delta to offer higher salaries while maintaining profitability. Frontier, as an ultra-low-cost carrier, prioritizes keeping operational costs—including labor—lower to offer competitive ticket prices.
- Benefits and Perks: Beyond base salary, Delta pilots often receive better retirement plans, health benefits, and profit-sharing bonuses, which effectively increase their total compensation package compared to Frontier’s leaner offerings.
- Market Positioning: Delta competes as a premium airline, which supports paying pilots more to attract and retain top talent. Frontier, aiming for cost efficiency, might not prioritize the same level of pilot compensation to keep fares low.
- Profit Margins: Frontier operates on razor-thin profit margins compared to Delta, which enjoys robust profitability from its larger scale and premium market position. Paying Frontier pilots the same as Delta’s could push Frontier into unprofitability, as its low-cost model relies on keeping expenses—including labor—tightly controlled.
#47
On Reserve
Joined: Sep 2021
Posts: 33
Likes: 4
I don’t understand the logic of this. There is an opportunity cost associated with that. They won’t turn around a new deal immediately. Vote no if you think its a bad deal. But if its reasonable, at least consider it. Every day that goes by is money we lose. Don’t prolong that unnecessarily.
#48
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 3,750
Likes: 99
From: 1900D CA
I don’t understand the logic of this. There is an opportunity cost associated with that. They won’t turn around a new deal immediately. Vote no if you think its a bad deal. But if its reasonable, at least consider it. Every day that goes by is money we lose. Don’t prolong that unnecessarily.
This isn't buying a used car.
Voting no just to vote no could end up costing us a lot of money. Stupid
#49
Line Holder
Joined: Nov 2024
Posts: 425
Likes: 78
I don’t understand the logic of this. There is an opportunity cost associated with that. They won’t turn around a new deal immediately. Vote no if you think its a bad deal. But if its reasonable, at least consider it. Every day that goes by is money we lose. Don’t prolong that unnecessarily.
No profit sharing is losing money too.
No overrides will be losing money too.
No retro checks will be losing money too.
No snap ups will be losing money too.
Theres all sorts of ways you’ve been losing money and will continue to lose money.
im not really sure where you’re going with this.
you say “reasonable”, I’m not really sure what reasonable is. Two years ago, at the start of negotiations, reasonable had a very different connotation than “contract 2030”. Two years ago reaonable might have been JetBlue rates. Contract 2030 you think JB rates would be reasonable? F U if you think the answer to that question is yes.
Legacies start negotiations in 26.
Two contract cycles behind, years of money lost to inflation unable to be invested. You got idiots on here screaming out of both sides of their mouths that we aren’t going to be paid industry rates, but we’re not going to see a contract until god knows when.
so why are we taking about reasonable? Reason has gone dude. Your union is saying the company doesn’t negotiate in good faith. Reason has left the conversation. You probably have more to gain by not taking the first offer.
#50
On Reserve
Joined: Sep 2021
Posts: 33
Likes: 4
yeah well getting paid below market rates for the 5+ years of the contract’s life will be losing money too.
No profit sharing is losing money too.
No overrides will be losing money too.
No retro checks will be losing money too.
No snap ups will be losing money too.
Theres all sorts of ways you’ve been losing money and will continue to lose money.
im not really sure where you’re going with this.
you say “reasonable”, I’m not really sure what reasonable is. Two years ago, at the start of negotiations, reasonable had a very different connotation than “contract 2030”. Two years ago reaonable might have been JetBlue rates. Contract 2030 you think JB rates would be reasonable? F U if you think the answer to that question is yes.
Legacies start negotiations in 26.
Two contract cycles behind, years of money lost to inflation unable to be invested. You got idiots on here screaming out of both sides of their mouths that we aren’t going to be paid industry rates, but we’re not going to see a contract until god knows when.
so why are we taking about reasonable? Reason has gone dude. Your union is saying the company doesn’t negotiate in good faith. Reason has left the conversation. You probably have more to gain by not taking the first offer.
No profit sharing is losing money too.
No overrides will be losing money too.
No retro checks will be losing money too.
No snap ups will be losing money too.
Theres all sorts of ways you’ve been losing money and will continue to lose money.
im not really sure where you’re going with this.
you say “reasonable”, I’m not really sure what reasonable is. Two years ago, at the start of negotiations, reasonable had a very different connotation than “contract 2030”. Two years ago reaonable might have been JetBlue rates. Contract 2030 you think JB rates would be reasonable? F U if you think the answer to that question is yes.
Legacies start negotiations in 26.
Two contract cycles behind, years of money lost to inflation unable to be invested. You got idiots on here screaming out of both sides of their mouths that we aren’t going to be paid industry rates, but we’re not going to see a contract until god knows when.
so why are we taking about reasonable? Reason has gone dude. Your union is saying the company doesn’t negotiate in good faith. Reason has left the conversation. You probably have more to gain by not taking the first offer.
Last edited by aventhusiast; 03-21-2025 at 03:26 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



