Frontier Hiring.
#5592
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2015
Position: Prone Supported
Posts: 196
They've been talking about huge growth the entire 2+ years I've been here. Where is it going to come from? We can't get any more gates in ORD and our forward thinking leadership decided to let half of F9's gates in DEN fall into Delta's hands. Is there that much excess capacity in MCO?
#5593
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2013
Position: CRJ-200 CA
Posts: 434
I'm risking stating the obvious. 2 year upgrades have always been a myth. But they've also put out the aircraft delivery schedule, and net new aircraft didn't even begin on paper until now. The problem is, those net new aircraft aren't materializing due to Airbus having problems getting the NEOs out of the factory. There are probably many explanations for this, and I don't know them. But the reality is that we are way behind schedule for additional aircraft. We're so behind, in fact, that mgmt has wet leased our routes on other airlines' 737's. Until deliveries begin en masse, upgrade rates will not change, and "huge growth" will remain elusive.
#5594
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Position: A320 Captain
Posts: 641
No you cannot jumpseat on Virgin Atlantic! Check your reciprocal agreement list on Comply365. I do not see VA Atlantic. You are not serious about jumpseating with a lap child? ZED fare should be no problem.
#5595
Line Holder
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Posts: 78
I was serious because you have to be in the back anyway. Thanks for the info I wasn't sure where that list was. I appreciate it.
#5596
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Posts: 333
I think I understand your thought process, Sulk. The problem is that you assume they are planning an IPO sometime in the near future.
I'm in the minority who thinks that the sale / merger / IPO / whatever is a long way off. They are printing cash with the operation running as badly as it is.
BB came into RGS (for probably his last time signing up for that abuse), and told the pilots that we aren't interested in being in the top 50% of the DOT metrics or at the bottom of passenger complaints. If we are scoring that high or treating passengers too well, we're spending too much money for the desired result - maximum profit. They don't care what the passengers call your mom as long as they fork over $65 for a carry-on at the gate.
They want the operation to be just good enough to keep making money and attracting passengers who insult flight crew. If super low CASM EX-fuel (thanks in part to an employee doing the job of 1.5 employees) allows F9 to beat up on other airlines when fuel costs inevitably climb again - mission accomplished.
If a TA passed by 75/25 they obviously gave labor too much money. Their target is 50.00001% in favor. As long as there's a bunch of black ink at the bottom of the page at the end of the quarter, BB will gladly let passengers be as PO'd as they like. All the better if he can blame SwissPort, software developers, bad w/x in HNL or past management for the problems he's going to have fixed "soon".
This scheme has served ULCC management quite well for a while now. Read this, (written in 2007 after the ULCC model was put into place in 2006 at Spirit) and tell me that management cares how passengers are treated. Spirit CEO: "We owe him nothing" | Budget Travel's Blog | Travel Deals, Travel Tips, Travel Advice, Vacation Ideas
Obviously, the backlash lasted until the next fare war, and did zero harm to the bottom line.
I'm in the minority who thinks that the sale / merger / IPO / whatever is a long way off. They are printing cash with the operation running as badly as it is.
BB came into RGS (for probably his last time signing up for that abuse), and told the pilots that we aren't interested in being in the top 50% of the DOT metrics or at the bottom of passenger complaints. If we are scoring that high or treating passengers too well, we're spending too much money for the desired result - maximum profit. They don't care what the passengers call your mom as long as they fork over $65 for a carry-on at the gate.
They want the operation to be just good enough to keep making money and attracting passengers who insult flight crew. If super low CASM EX-fuel (thanks in part to an employee doing the job of 1.5 employees) allows F9 to beat up on other airlines when fuel costs inevitably climb again - mission accomplished.
If a TA passed by 75/25 they obviously gave labor too much money. Their target is 50.00001% in favor. As long as there's a bunch of black ink at the bottom of the page at the end of the quarter, BB will gladly let passengers be as PO'd as they like. All the better if he can blame SwissPort, software developers, bad w/x in HNL or past management for the problems he's going to have fixed "soon".
This scheme has served ULCC management quite well for a while now. Read this, (written in 2007 after the ULCC model was put into place in 2006 at Spirit) and tell me that management cares how passengers are treated. Spirit CEO: "We owe him nothing" | Budget Travel's Blog | Travel Deals, Travel Tips, Travel Advice, Vacation Ideas
Obviously, the backlash lasted until the next fare war, and did zero harm to the bottom line.
#5597
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2015
Position: Prone Supported
Posts: 196
Wow. Truly all they care about is wringing every last cent out of this place. Do they realize that no more money will be wrung if the airline isn't operating?
#5598
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: 1900D CA
Posts: 3,394
The NEOs are delayed because we don't have our maintenance program approved for the new birds. The planes themselves are ready, in fact, I think there are already 3 of them nearly ready to leave the factory, but we forgot to get a maintenance program put together.
As was posted above, the actual fleet growth was never supposed to happen until right about now. All the hiring of the last nearly 3 years was due to an increase in aircraft utilization.
I believe that we are going to grow a lot in the next few years. Indigo profits from each aircraft delivery as they sell the planes to the lease company at a profit. It will be interesting to see where they start putting all the new planes. It probably won't be Chicago or Denver. Just aren't any gates
As was posted above, the actual fleet growth was never supposed to happen until right about now. All the hiring of the last nearly 3 years was due to an increase in aircraft utilization.
I believe that we are going to grow a lot in the next few years. Indigo profits from each aircraft delivery as they sell the planes to the lease company at a profit. It will be interesting to see where they start putting all the new planes. It probably won't be Chicago or Denver. Just aren't any gates
#5599
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2015
Position: Prone Supported
Posts: 196
The NEOs are delayed because we don't have our maintenance program approved for the new birds. The planes themselves are ready, in fact, I think there are already 3 of them nearly ready to leave the factory, but we forgot to get a maintenance program put together.
As was posted above, the actual fleet growth was never supposed to happen until right about now. All the hiring of the last nearly 3 years was due to an increase in aircraft utilization.
I believe that we are going to grow a lot in the next few years. Indigo profits from each aircraft delivery as they sell the planes to the lease company at a profit. It will be interesting to see where they start putting all the new planes. It probably won't be Chicago or Denver. Just aren't any gates
As was posted above, the actual fleet growth was never supposed to happen until right about now. All the hiring of the last nearly 3 years was due to an increase in aircraft utilization.
I believe that we are going to grow a lot in the next few years. Indigo profits from each aircraft delivery as they sell the planes to the lease company at a profit. It will be interesting to see where they start putting all the new planes. It probably won't be Chicago or Denver. Just aren't any gates
#5600
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Position: Bus CA
Posts: 658
Delta Pilot's Negotiating Committee just reached an AIP with Management
Hourly pay raises of 18%/3%/3%/4%
Full retro from Jan 1 2016
No change to Profit Sharing
No change to RJ's from current PWA
Vacation increases 3:30 day on 4/1/17
3:45 day for first 14 days of vacation on 4/1/19
All vacation value applies towards line construction
increases to 16% DPSP contribution on Jan 1, 2017
CQ Training Pay increases to 4:00 day Jan 1 2017
Sick Leave TA amended sick leave AIP to add provision establishing that catastrophic injury or illness is not counted toward the lookback verification threshold
Amendable Dec 31, 2019
Hourly pay raises of 18%/3%/3%/4%
Full retro from Jan 1 2016
No change to Profit Sharing
No change to RJ's from current PWA
Vacation increases 3:30 day on 4/1/17
3:45 day for first 14 days of vacation on 4/1/19
All vacation value applies towards line construction
increases to 16% DPSP contribution on Jan 1, 2017
CQ Training Pay increases to 4:00 day Jan 1 2017
Sick Leave TA amended sick leave AIP to add provision establishing that catastrophic injury or illness is not counted toward the lookback verification threshold
Amendable Dec 31, 2019
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
4 Fan Trashcan
Mergers and Acquisitions
7
01-28-2009 09:27 AM