Frontier Hiring.
08-18-2017, 08:37 AM
#8111
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Posts: 464
Originally Posted by SeaRider
According to that, we have 11 318's so...maybe not a great source of info.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Edit* and it also shows some that are returned as well such as 214. The site isn't wholly accurate, but it seems like its the best we have if one can recall which aircraft have been returned. Maybe the lease returns take time to process?
08-18-2017, 12:14 PM
#8112
ILL BEE DAT
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: Rollin' Down tha 405
Posts: 2,550
Originally Posted by SeaRider
According to that, we have 11 318's so...maybe not a great source of info.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Originally Posted by Gary et al
If you clicked around you'd see those 11 318s are also listed in the scrapped section.
Edit* and it also shows some that are returned as well such as 214. The site isn't wholly accurate, but it seems like its the best we have if one can recall which aircraft have been returned. Maybe the lease returns take time to process?
Edit* and it also shows some that are returned as well such as 214. The site isn't wholly accurate, but it seems like its the best we have if one can recall which aircraft have been returned. Maybe the lease returns take time to process?
08-18-2017, 12:21 PM
#8113
ILL BEE DAT
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: Rollin' Down tha 405
Posts: 2,550
Originally Posted by SeaRider
According to that, we have 11 318's so...maybe not a great source of info.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Originally Posted by Gary et al
If you clicked around you'd see those 11 318s are also listed in the scrapped section.
Edit* and it also shows some that are returned as well such as 214. The site isn't wholly accurate, but it seems like its the best we have if one can recall which aircraft have been returned. Maybe the lease returns take time to process?
Edit* and it also shows some that are returned as well such as 214. The site isn't wholly accurate, but it seems like its the best we have if one can recall which aircraft have been returned. Maybe the lease returns take time to process?
08-18-2017, 01:54 PM
#8114
Line Holder
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Posts: 71
This website is good for future airframes we are getting. It will also let you search by operator or MSN so you can see exactly which airframes we have returned and where they went. Unless my eyes deceive me the last flight of our next NEO flew on July 3.
https://xfw-spotter.blogspot.de/
https://xfw-spotter.blogspot.de/
08-22-2017, 02:04 PM
#8115
Line Holder
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Posts: 69
Originally Posted by whooooooocares
I've made it my second job to try and get on at f9. If anyone has any pointers or can assist me in any way much would be appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
Thanks in advance.
1) Read through this entire thread
2) Visit Frontierpilotfacts.com
3) Then open an account at airlineapps.com
4) Reevaluate what you have made your second job
08-23-2017, 07:34 AM
#8116
USAF-AA-N8-F9
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Position: A320 gear actuator
Posts: 23
CBA
Can anyone point me towards the exact page/paragraph where it states that F9 pilots can request a hotel if we encounter a 4+ hour delay or more between legs? Or if I'm imagining this. Or if it is in another document containing CFR117 info. Thanks!
08-23-2017, 09:20 AM
#8117
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2015
Position: Prone Supported
Posts: 196
Originally Posted by prettywhacked
Can anyone point me towards the exact page/paragraph where it states that F9 pilots can request a hotel if we encounter a 4+ hour delay or more between legs? Or if I'm imagining this. Or if it is in another document containing CFR117 info. Thanks!
08-23-2017, 06:47 PM
#8118
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,819
Originally Posted by Arty13
Page 2.5, paragraph 5. You don't get a hotel on a delay, only a scheduled sit. The single exception is if SOC "reasonably expects" a ground delay of more than 6 hours. Good luck getting that phrase out of SOC! Lol
08-24-2017, 10:48 AM
#8119
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Posts: 410
Regarding current aircraft on property and future deliveries, am I the only one that found it odd that in the September bid package, the total aircraft number in fleet was omitted?
In the August bid pack, fleet size reduced throughout the month from 66 to 64. Then in the September pack, that information was not given to us. Why did that information suddenly disappear from the bid pack? Coincidence? Or maybe management doesn't want us to realize that we are shrinking, not growing?
Management had been saying for year 2017 we were going to be +12 airframes over 2016. So far we have fewer airframes, and the year is winding down.
In the August bid pack, fleet size reduced throughout the month from 66 to 64. Then in the September pack, that information was not given to us. Why did that information suddenly disappear from the bid pack? Coincidence? Or maybe management doesn't want us to realize that we are shrinking, not growing?
Management had been saying for year 2017 we were going to be +12 airframes over 2016. So far we have fewer airframes, and the year is winding down.
08-24-2017, 11:20 AM
#8120
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Position: Bus CA
Posts: 658
Originally Posted by ColdWhiskey
Regarding current aircraft on property and future deliveries, am I the only one that found it odd that in the September bid package, the total aircraft number in fleet was omitted?
In the August bid pack, fleet size reduced throughout the month from 66 to 64. Then in the September pack, that information was not given to us. Why did that information suddenly disappear from the bid pack? Coincidence? Or maybe management doesn't want us to realize that we are shrinking, not growing?
Management had been saying for year 2017 we were going to be +12 airframes over 2016. So far we have fewer airframes, and the year is winding down.
In the August bid pack, fleet size reduced throughout the month from 66 to 64. Then in the September pack, that information was not given to us. Why did that information suddenly disappear from the bid pack? Coincidence? Or maybe management doesn't want us to realize that we are shrinking, not growing?
Management had been saying for year 2017 we were going to be +12 airframes over 2016. So far we have fewer airframes, and the year is winding down.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
4 Fan Trashcan
Mergers and Acquisitions
7
01-28-2009 09:27 AM
