Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk
Terms that annoy you on the radio >

Terms that annoy you on the radio

Search
Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

Terms that annoy you on the radio

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-01-2013, 03:16 PM
  #111  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,919
Default

Originally Posted by exdashtrash View Post
You're too grumpy. I'm a 3 direction FO. If the controller tells me more than 3 things (heading, alt, speed, new freq, etc.), I'll forget the last thing which is usually the flight number. So instead of stumbling through the flight number, I'll just trail off or mumble.
You and me both brother.
DeadHead is offline  
Old 10-01-2013, 03:44 PM
  #112  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,837
Default

Originally Posted by PDK1011 View Post
My pet peeve will always be "here comes the flash". You're not taking a picture loser. Hitting the ident button acknowledges their "Eight Alpha Foxtrot, ident" request.
Unless the pilot didn't hear it or didn't understand it.
The "here comes the" part is extraneous, but the 'flash' is comm brevity that many military bring with them.
USMCFLYR is offline  
Old 10-01-2013, 08:01 PM
  #113  
Line Holder
 
PDK1011's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Posts: 25
Default

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR View Post
Unless the pilot didn't hear it or didn't understand it.
The "here comes the" part is extraneous, but the 'flash' is comm brevity that many military bring with them.
True but I guess I'm referring to the weekend warriors & private pilots who hear someone say it & think its cool to say.
PDK1011 is offline  
Old 10-01-2013, 09:02 PM
  #114  
Organizational Learning 
 
TonyC's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Directly behind the combiner
Posts: 4,948
Default

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR View Post

The "here comes the" part is extraneous, but the 'flash' is comm brevity that many military bring with them.

That's not the only bad habit or incorrect procedure that "many military bring with them." Many put their "clearance on request" and report ready for departure (in their turbojet) upon reaching the active. It's not ALL their fault -- that's the way they were taught.


The instruction should be acknowledged. If brevity is the goal, try responding with the callsign or N-number. It's not a bad time to include a "Wilco."

If someone can show me where "flash" is standard terminology, I'll stand corrected.






.
TonyC is offline  
Old 10-02-2013, 02:07 AM
  #115  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 880
Default

Flew with a guy the other day who said, "Approach, callsign123, with you checking in..."
Gjn290 is offline  
Old 10-02-2013, 02:27 AM
  #116  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Position: PA-18, Front
Posts: 187
Default

Originally Posted by EasternATC View Post
Numbers, I didn't quite get all this, but you're from north of the border, right? You are absolutely correct about being told to "check in with your speed," etc. It's a crappy habit too many controllers use today, for various reasons; no one should tolerate it.
Yes I am. I've been out of the heavy metal world for some time now, but I don't recall ever having to put up with this kind of uploading in Europe or Asia, or anywhere else outside North America for that matter. The problem is that the Regulator, by approving an Air Carrier's Flight Operations Manual, elevates its contents to the power of regulations, albeit indirectly. So if the Air Carrier's FOM says, the use of the word "shall" means mandatory action, and that pilots "shall" comply with ATC instructions (save specified circumstances), then by approving the FOM, the Regulator, in effect, says, pilots (of that carrier) "shall comply with ATC instructions (save specified circumstances)." And if the pilot doesn't, he subjects himself to enforcement - in addition to any disciplinary action. Granted, it's a power seldom enforced, but it is cited during post-incident hearings if relevant. And that's enough to cause a chilling effect, i.e. the disinclination to refuse ATC uploading. But I agree with you 100%: no pilot should tolerate it.
9780991975808 is offline  
Old 10-02-2013, 04:31 AM
  #117  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Position: PA-18, Front
Posts: 187
Default

Originally Posted by savall View Post
Let 'em "pull the tapes" then...

It was my understanding that final authority always lies with the cp in the US unless it is a TA. Is it a new regulation that you must always comply with ATC ? Or are you specifically talking about getting a shortcut direct to..?
Take a gander at post #116 and also...

"Compliance with Air Traffic Control Instructions and Clearances

602.31 (1) Subject to subsection (3), the pilot-in command of an aircraft shall
(a) comply with and acknowledge, to the appropriate air traffic control unit, all of the air traffic control instructions directed to and received by the pilot-in-command; and..."
"(3) The pilot-in-command of an aircraft may deviate from an air traffic control clearance or an air traffic control instruction to the extent necessary to carry out a collision avoidance manoeuvre, where the manoeuvre is carried out
(a) in accordance with a resolution advisory generated by an Airborne Collision Avoidance System (ACAS) or a Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance System (TCAS); or
(b) in response to a warning from a Ground Proximity Warning System (GPWS) on board the aircraft."

(http://www.tc.gc.ca/eng/civilaviation/regserv/cars/part6-602-2436.htm)

(I wrote my FAA ATP exams over a half a century ago, so I don't remember what the regs are down there anymore. I suspect they're similar)
9780991975808 is offline  
Old 10-02-2013, 05:13 AM
  #118  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,837
Default

Originally Posted by TonyC View Post
That's not the only bad habit or incorrect procedure that "many military bring with them." Many put their "clearance on request" and report ready for departure (in their turbojet) upon reaching the active. It's not ALL their fault -- that's the way they were taught.


The instruction should be acknowledged. If brevity is the goal, try responding with the callsign or N-number. It's not a bad time to include a "Wilco."

If someone can show me where "flash" is standard terminology, I'll stand corrected.






.
Standard military or civilian terminology?
OPERATIONAL BREVITY WORDS AND TERMINOLOGY
This link shows 'Flash' in the context we were discussing.

Can you explain why 'Clearance on request' or reporting ready for departure are wrong (and you specifically mention turbojets)?

You're right. Much of it is what I was taught and much of it is what I have used for 20+ years and it has worked with no problems. I've tried to de-militarize some of my comm since I left the military but some I'll keep.

Speaking of annoying.......at my home field of KOKC, it is always on the ATIS and published on the airfield diagram that the "Ramps are uncontrolled. Do not call for push/power back. Advise grd con when ready for taxi"
http://skyvector.com/files/tpp/1310/pdf/00301AD.PDF
How many times do you think crews still call? (Rhetorical)
USMCFLYR is offline  
Old 10-02-2013, 05:41 AM
  #119  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Position: PA-18, Front
Posts: 187
Default

Regarding readbacks and acknowledgments, forget it on ramp/apron/ground/tower control at some busy airports. E.g. "XX123 contact departure; YY456 cleared for takeoff; ZZ789 taxi to position be ready to go; ..." On the ground, you're expected to switch frequency when you reach the spot buried somewhere in the notes of page XX of your approach plates - as revised by NOTAM #YY - listen for your call sign, and do what the the controller tells you or lose your slot. Go with the flow and risk a violation (see above, post #117), or stick to the regs and you can be sure someone will be all over you. Your choice: spotless record or chow for the kids.
9780991975808 is offline  
Old 10-02-2013, 08:04 AM
  #120  
Gets Weekends Off
 
cardiomd's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Position: Seat: Vegan friendly faux leather
Posts: 988
Default

Originally Posted by PDK1011 View Post
My pet peeve will always be "here comes the flash". You're not taking a picture loser. Hitting the ident button acknowledges their "Eight Alpha Foxtrot, ident" request.
Interesting. What do you want us to say? I usually say nothing as I was taught, but it usually takes about 10 seconds before they come back and say "ident complete fly heading..." I understand it can take some time to "bloom" on your radar? Sometimes I read back something like "28 sierra ident".

I was on frequency where this foreign guy and a controller were trying to troubleshoot a transponder, and because the guy didn't say he pushed ident, it was this comical back-and-forth for 3 minutes, embarrassing.
cardiomd is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sandrich
Hangar Talk
4
12-10-2011 09:59 PM
zyttocs
Technical
5
07-22-2011 08:44 PM
Whale Pilot
Hangar Talk
5
08-05-2009 11:11 PM
ToiletDuck
Flight Schools and Training
21
02-26-2007 03:04 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices