2-14-18 Interviews
02-22-2018 | 10:29 AM
#63
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 3,274
Likes: 55
From: 190 captain and “Pro-pilot”
02-22-2018 | 10:44 AM
#64
The REAL Bluedriver
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,935
Likes: 0
From: Airbus Capt
Well, we basically always fall short of the advertised hiring number anyways. For example, we had been saying we were going to hire 300 the last couple years. As you can see from the other guys numbers, we didn't. So I take the 265 protection with a grain of salt.
Next, we have only been netting sub 200 per year to the list on average. You know the attrition has all been in the 1-3 year range. So after the 3 years, the ONLY number that matters is the net number. Most guys get hired here with a 25-35 year career ahead of them, so for 95-98% of your career who cares if we hire 250 when the list is only going to grow by 180 anyway?
But sure, if it makes you feel better I gave the relevant number but not the shiny glossy flashy sales pitch number.
I will also point out that you overshot and exaggerated even the shiny glossy flashy sales pitch number. So, maybe you shouldn't be so critical?
Either way, take a poll on here on who wants to admit JB hasn't been a big disappointment to them during their time here??? We'll put you, Southerner, LOWpayman and Hyper down as a no. How about the rest? I'm willing to bet that poll would be near 100%.
Keep selling!
Next, we have only been netting sub 200 per year to the list on average. You know the attrition has all been in the 1-3 year range. So after the 3 years, the ONLY number that matters is the net number. Most guys get hired here with a 25-35 year career ahead of them, so for 95-98% of your career who cares if we hire 250 when the list is only going to grow by 180 anyway?
But sure, if it makes you feel better I gave the relevant number but not the shiny glossy flashy sales pitch number.
I will also point out that you overshot and exaggerated even the shiny glossy flashy sales pitch number. So, maybe you shouldn't be so critical?
Either way, take a poll on here on who wants to admit JB hasn't been a big disappointment to them during their time here??? We'll put you, Southerner, LOWpayman and Hyper down as a no. How about the rest? I'm willing to bet that poll would be near 100%.
Keep selling!
02-22-2018 | 10:55 AM
#65
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,594
Likes: 0
Well, we basically always fall short of the advertised hiring number anyways. For example, we had been saying we were going to hire 300 the last couple years. As you can see from the other guys numbers, we didn't. So I take the 265 protection with a grain of salt.
Next, we have only been netting sub 200 per year to the list on average. You know the attrition has all been in the 1-3 year range. So after the 3 years, the ONLY number that matters is the net number. Most guys get hired here with a 25-35 year career ahead of them, so for 95-98% of your career who cares if we hire 250 when the list is only going to grow by 180 anyway?
But sure, if it makes you feel better I gave the relevant number but not the shiny glossy flashy sales pitch number.
I will also point out that you overshot and exaggerated even the shiny glossy flashy sales pitch number. So, maybe you shouldn't be so critical?
Either way, take a poll on here on who wants to admit JB hasn't been a big disappointment to them during their time here??? We'll put you, Southerner, LOWpayman and Hyper down as a no. How about the rest? I'm willing to bet that poll would be near 100%.
Keep selling!
Next, we have only been netting sub 200 per year to the list on average. You know the attrition has all been in the 1-3 year range. So after the 3 years, the ONLY number that matters is the net number. Most guys get hired here with a 25-35 year career ahead of them, so for 95-98% of your career who cares if we hire 250 when the list is only going to grow by 180 anyway?
But sure, if it makes you feel better I gave the relevant number but not the shiny glossy flashy sales pitch number.
I will also point out that you overshot and exaggerated even the shiny glossy flashy sales pitch number. So, maybe you shouldn't be so critical?
Either way, take a poll on here on who wants to admit JB hasn't been a big disappointment to them during their time here??? We'll put you, Southerner, LOWpayman and Hyper down as a no. How about the rest? I'm willing to bet that poll would be near 100%.
Keep selling!
02-22-2018 | 11:22 AM
#66
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,236
Likes: 0
No I wouldn’t say that. Most guys get past phase 2 but some don’t and are given no explanation. Definitely do not burn any bridges or quit your current job.
02-22-2018 | 11:43 AM
#67
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
From: Ablue320
I agree with this. You have the job at this point, until you don’t. There “is” a reason you get turned down in phase 2. They won’t send a TBNT email because they filled their quota. It could be as simple as comparing that one training failure to your score on the computer test.
02-22-2018 | 11:45 AM
#68
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 3,274
Likes: 55
From: 190 captain and “Pro-pilot”
Well, we basically always fall short of the advertised hiring number anyways. For example, we had been saying we were going to hire 300 the last couple years. As you can see from the other guys numbers, we didn't. So I take the 265 protection with a grain of salt.
Next, we have only been netting sub 200 per year to the list on average. You know the attrition has all been in the 1-3 year range. So after the 3 years, the ONLY number that matters is the net number. Most guys get hired here with a 25-35 year career ahead of them, so for 95-98% of your career who cares if we hire 250 when the list is only going to grow by 180 anyway?
But sure, if it makes you feel better I gave the relevant number but not the shiny glossy flashy sales pitch number.
I will also point out that you overshot and exaggerated even the shiny glossy flashy sales pitch number. So, maybe you shouldn't be so critical?
Either way, take a poll on here on who wants to admit JB hasn't been a big disappointment to them during their time here??? We'll put you, Southerner, LOWpayman and Hyper down as a no. How about the rest? I'm willing to bet that poll would be near 100%.
Keep selling!
Next, we have only been netting sub 200 per year to the list on average. You know the attrition has all been in the 1-3 year range. So after the 3 years, the ONLY number that matters is the net number. Most guys get hired here with a 25-35 year career ahead of them, so for 95-98% of your career who cares if we hire 250 when the list is only going to grow by 180 anyway?
But sure, if it makes you feel better I gave the relevant number but not the shiny glossy flashy sales pitch number.
I will also point out that you overshot and exaggerated even the shiny glossy flashy sales pitch number. So, maybe you shouldn't be so critical?
Either way, take a poll on here on who wants to admit JB hasn't been a big disappointment to them during their time here??? We'll put you, Southerner, LOWpayman and Hyper down as a no. How about the rest? I'm willing to bet that poll would be near 100%.
Keep selling!
I said I THINK 300ish. That’s hardly a sales pitch.
02-22-2018 | 11:47 AM
#69
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,047
Likes: 0
From: B6
02-22-2018 | 11:48 AM
#70
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,047
Likes: 0
From: B6
Well, we basically always fall short of the advertised hiring number anyways. For example, we had been saying we were going to hire 300 the last couple years. As you can see from the other guys numbers, we didn't. So I take the 265 protection with a grain of salt.
Next, we have only been netting sub 200 per year to the list on average. You know the attrition has all been in the 1-3 year range. So after the 3 years, the ONLY number that matters is the net number. Most guys get hired here with a 25-35 year career ahead of them, so for 95-98% of your career who cares if we hire 250 when the list is only going to grow by 180 anyway?
But sure, if it makes you feel better I gave the relevant number but not the shiny glossy flashy sales pitch number.
I will also point out that you overshot and exaggerated even the shiny glossy flashy sales pitch number. So, maybe you shouldn't be so critical?
Either way, take a poll on here on who wants to admit JB hasn't been a big disappointment to them during their time here??? We'll put you, Southerner, LOWpayman and Hyper down as a no. How about the rest? I'm willing to bet that poll would be near 100%.
Keep selling!
Next, we have only been netting sub 200 per year to the list on average. You know the attrition has all been in the 1-3 year range. So after the 3 years, the ONLY number that matters is the net number. Most guys get hired here with a 25-35 year career ahead of them, so for 95-98% of your career who cares if we hire 250 when the list is only going to grow by 180 anyway?
But sure, if it makes you feel better I gave the relevant number but not the shiny glossy flashy sales pitch number.
I will also point out that you overshot and exaggerated even the shiny glossy flashy sales pitch number. So, maybe you shouldn't be so critical?
Either way, take a poll on here on who wants to admit JB hasn't been a big disappointment to them during their time here??? We'll put you, Southerner, LOWpayman and Hyper down as a no. How about the rest? I'm willing to bet that poll would be near 100%.
Keep selling!
The reason the numbers are lower is attrition is lower....Simple math.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
