System Bid
08-01-2019, 06:26 AM
#141
The REAL Bluedriver
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,881
Originally Posted by RedOverWhite
188 320 vacancies is what I counted, didn’t factor in the negative vacancies on the 190, but that seat is obviously overstaffed *extreme sarcasm*
08-01-2019, 07:04 AM
#144
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 776
Originally Posted by RedOverWhite
188 320 vacancies is what I counted, didn’t factor in the negative vacancies on the 190, but that seat is obviously overstaffed *extreme sarcasm*
They certainly can’t afford to reduce BOS 190 CA by 63 pilots.
08-01-2019, 07:56 AM
#145
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Posts: 247
Originally Posted by SmitteyB
Notice the fact that BOS 190 CA active pilots don’t change after the reduction. For instance they are forecasting -21 for 3 straight bid awards, but don’t change the Active pilots on subsequent bids. They probably overlooked that because it makes no sense.
They certainly can’t afford to reduce BOS 190 CA by 63 pilots.
They certainly can’t afford to reduce BOS 190 CA by 63 pilots.
08-01-2019, 08:32 AM
#146
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2016
Posts: 2,559
The only thing I know for certain after viewing all the numbers in a spreadsheet is:
1) These folks have no idea how to plan
2) There will be several supplementals next year
Gibberish is what the numbers indicate to me.
1) These folks have no idea how to plan
2) There will be several supplementals next year
Gibberish is what the numbers indicate to me.
08-01-2019, 08:40 AM
#147
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Position: Straight outta LoCash
Posts: 176
Originally Posted by SmitteyB
Notice the fact that BOS 190 CA active pilots don’t change after the reduction. For instance they are forecasting -21 for 3 straight bid awards, but don’t change the Active pilots on subsequent bids. They probably overlooked that because it makes no sense.
They certainly can’t afford to reduce BOS 190 CA by 63 pilots.
They certainly can’t afford to reduce BOS 190 CA by 63 pilots.
Seems like it's all kind of a WAG anyway, should be entertaining to see play out...
08-01-2019, 09:22 AM
#148
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Position: CA
Posts: 1,211
Originally Posted by HighFlight
The only thing I know for certain after viewing all the numbers in a spreadsheet is:
1) These folks have no idea how to plan
2) There will be several supplementals next year
Gibberish is what the numbers indicate to me.
1) These folks have no idea how to plan
2) There will be several supplementals next year
Gibberish is what the numbers indicate to me.
You wrote it yourself yet you don't understand? WTF?
08-01-2019, 09:26 AM
#149
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2015
Posts: 917
Originally Posted by RedOverWhite
That's a good point, I didn't even compare the vacancy number to the total for 190 CA, I guess I just assumed -21 (BOS) was what they were overstaffed by for the year, and it was a merely a placeholder until they need to backfill via supplementals.
Seems like it's all kind of a WAG anyway, should be entertaining to see play out...
Seems like it's all kind of a WAG anyway, should be entertaining to see play out...
08-01-2019, 11:10 AM
#150
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,236
Originally Posted by Softpayman
You have it right there (#2). There will be supplemental bids.
You wrote it yourself yet you don't understand? WTF?
You wrote it yourself yet you don't understand? WTF?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
