Search

Notices

System Bid

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-01-2019 | 06:26 AM
  #141  
The REAL Bluedriver
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,935
Likes: 0
From: Airbus Capt
Default

Originally Posted by RedOverWhite
188 320 vacancies is what I counted, didn’t factor in the negative vacancies on the 190, but that seat is obviously overstaffed *extreme sarcasm*
Is that 188 320 ***CAPTAIN*** vacancies?
Reply
Old 08-01-2019 | 06:32 AM
  #142  
RedOverWhite's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
From: Straight outta LoCash
Default

Originally Posted by Bluedriver
Is that 188 320 ***CAPTAIN*** vacancies?
Yeah, that’s what I counted....for the whole year.
Reply
Old 08-01-2019 | 06:38 AM
  #143  
The REAL Bluedriver
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,935
Likes: 0
From: Airbus Capt
Default

Originally Posted by RedOverWhite
Yeah, that’s what I counted....for the whole year.
Gracias Amy-go.
Reply
Old 08-01-2019 | 07:04 AM
  #144  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 919
Likes: 27
Default

Originally Posted by RedOverWhite
188 320 vacancies is what I counted, didn’t factor in the negative vacancies on the 190, but that seat is obviously overstaffed *extreme sarcasm*
Notice the fact that BOS 190 CA active pilots don’t change after the reduction. For instance they are forecasting -21 for 3 straight bid awards, but don’t change the Active pilots on subsequent bids. They probably overlooked that because it makes no sense.

They certainly can’t afford to reduce BOS 190 CA by 63 pilots.
Reply
Old 08-01-2019 | 07:56 AM
  #145  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by SmitteyB
Notice the fact that BOS 190 CA active pilots don’t change after the reduction. For instance they are forecasting -21 for 3 straight bid awards, but don’t change the Active pilots on subsequent bids. They probably overlooked that because it makes no sense.

They certainly can’t afford to reduce BOS 190 CA by 63 pilots.
Maybe this means their "need" will be minus 21 but they don't intend to displace pilots? I saw that too and was trying to figure it out
Reply
Old 08-01-2019 | 08:32 AM
  #146  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 2,559
Likes: 0
Default

The only thing I know for certain after viewing all the numbers in a spreadsheet is:

1) These folks have no idea how to plan
2) There will be several supplementals next year

Gibberish is what the numbers indicate to me.
Reply
Old 08-01-2019 | 08:40 AM
  #147  
RedOverWhite's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
From: Straight outta LoCash
Default

Originally Posted by SmitteyB
Notice the fact that BOS 190 CA active pilots don’t change after the reduction. For instance they are forecasting -21 for 3 straight bid awards, but don’t change the Active pilots on subsequent bids. They probably overlooked that because it makes no sense.

They certainly can’t afford to reduce BOS 190 CA by 63 pilots.
That's a good point, I didn't even compare the vacancy number to the total for 190 CA, I guess I just assumed -21 (BOS) was what they were overstaffed by for the year, and it was a merely a placeholder until they need to backfill via supplementals.

Seems like it's all kind of a WAG anyway, should be entertaining to see play out...
Reply
Old 08-01-2019 | 09:22 AM
  #148  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,299
Likes: 5
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by HighFlight
The only thing I know for certain after viewing all the numbers in a spreadsheet is:

1) These folks have no idea how to plan
2) There will be several supplementals next year

Gibberish is what the numbers indicate to me.
You have it right there (#2). There will be supplemental bids.

You wrote it yourself yet you don't understand? WTF?
Reply
Old 08-01-2019 | 09:26 AM
  #149  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 919
Likes: 3
Default

Originally Posted by RedOverWhite
That's a good point, I didn't even compare the vacancy number to the total for 190 CA, I guess I just assumed -21 (BOS) was what they were overstaffed by for the year, and it was a merely a placeholder until they need to backfill via supplementals.

Seems like it's all kind of a WAG anyway, should be entertaining to see play out...
190BOS Capt overstaffed??? I doubt it.
Reply
Old 08-01-2019 | 11:10 AM
  #150  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,236
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Softpayman
You have it right there (#2). There will be supplemental bids.

You wrote it yourself yet you don't understand? WTF?
None of it is clear. Maybe you can enlighten us. How many pilots are they hiring next year based on this bid?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EWR73FO
United
67
02-25-2012 07:11 PM
EWRflyr
United
42
07-28-2011 08:28 AM
EWRflyr
United
23
07-25-2011 09:23 AM
Roberto
Cargo
147
06-09-2008 04:31 PM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
17
08-20-2005 07:01 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices