jetBlue Hiring
04-22-2021, 06:29 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Posts: 290
Originally Posted by giggidy
Also when you guys are saying “poolie” I’m assuming that is referencing someone who has already actually applied and is in the “pool” of applicants?
04-22-2021, 06:46 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2015
Posts: 917
Originally Posted by BeatNavy
“When the pandemic hit our industry a year ago, we had 34 Pilots in our training pipeline that had not yet been released to OE. I am happy to share that those Pilots are returning to JBU in May and will be fully released to the operation by early summer.....We will also be hiring new Pilots starting in June....Final numbers will depend on how the supplemental bid is awarded, but we should be adding several hundred new Pilots to our ranks this year.”
Good news for the poolies...and other applicants.
Good news for the poolies...and other applicants.
04-22-2021, 03:12 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2018
Posts: 703
Originally Posted by BlueJetDork
Hope this is not theater for JetBlue’s arbitration!
04-23-2021, 04:19 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2020
Position: Airbus 320 Left
Posts: 254
Originally Posted by Desdi
Oh the one for when they bargained in bad faith offering furlough protection (when the govt under the new admin would have kept that from happening in perpetuity), and 2% (which traditionally would have been recouped in the next CBA signing bonus)?
04-23-2021, 05:26 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2018
Posts: 703
Originally Posted by Descendto450
ahh that wasn’t a negotiation that was just an offer. There is a big difference. It may be perceived as predatory but not “negotiated in good faith”. There was no bargaining. Negotiation implies that the negotiating committee actual was involved in a give and take scenario it was more of a take it or leave it from the company..
04-23-2021, 07:29 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2020
Position: Airbus 320 Left
Posts: 254
Originally Posted by Desdi
Hence why it shouldn’t have even made it out for radification.
04-23-2021, 11:03 AM
The REAL Bluedriver
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,879
Originally Posted by Descendto450
We will have to agree to disagree on that issue. I was proud to see the democratic process work and unlike LOA 12 where we didn’t even get a chance to vote on it.. It was an offer we rejected it now we get to go to arbitration, hopefully we will win maybe we won’t..
Outside of being released by the NMB at the end of section 6, can the company simply put out a vote to reduce pay rates by 20%, and then simply just implement that pay cut anyway if the pilots vote it down?
After you answer those, please explain how this is any different???
The company is directly and explicitly violating the CBA if/when they codeshare between focus cities and/or between a focus city and ANY international destination within the range of the A321NEO.
They CANNOT simply make an offer, and then simply do whatever they please regardless of how the pilots vote.
04-23-2021, 12:36 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2020
Position: Airbus 320 Left
Posts: 254
Originally Posted by Bluedriver
450, let me ask you a few simple questions. Outside of being released by the NMB at the end of section 6, can the company simply put out a vote to reduce the ADG to 4.0, and then simply implement it anyway if the pilots vote no?
Outside of being released by the NMB at the end of section 6, can the company simply put out a vote to reduce pay rates by 20%, and then simply just implement that pay cut anyway if the pilots vote it down?
After you answer those, please explain how this is any different???
The company is directly and explicitly violating the CBA if/when they codeshare between focus cities and/or between a focus city and ANY international destination within the range of the A321NEO.
They CANNOT simply make an offer, and then simply do whatever they please regardless of how the pilots vote.
Outside of being released by the NMB at the end of section 6, can the company simply put out a vote to reduce pay rates by 20%, and then simply just implement that pay cut anyway if the pilots vote it down?
After you answer those, please explain how this is any different???
The company is directly and explicitly violating the CBA if/when they codeshare between focus cities and/or between a focus city and ANY international destination within the range of the A321NEO.
They CANNOT simply make an offer, and then simply do whatever they please regardless of how the pilots vote.
Last edited by Descendto450; 04-23-2021 at 12:49 PM. Reason: Because I can’t spell
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
