JetBlue Latest and Greatest
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2019
Posts: 357
For people so outraged about their union many of you are completely ignorant to how it even works. On that note, JBPA is a total non-starter unless you want the company to have even more ability to manipulate the union. The goal should be to replace the voting members of the MEC with those who will vote out the current leadership.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,513
Actually, I didn't say anything about *Council* 191. The MEC chairman needs to go. And I was responding to SaintNick's post where he suggests the MEC is one person when it is in fact a group of people.
For people so outraged about their union many of you are completely ignorant to how it even works. On that note, JBPA is a total non-starter unless you want the company to have even more ability to manipulate the union. The goal should be to replace the voting members of the MEC with those who will vote out the current leadership.
For people so outraged about their union many of you are completely ignorant to how it even works. On that note, JBPA is a total non-starter unless you want the company to have even more ability to manipulate the union. The goal should be to replace the voting members of the MEC with those who will vote out the current leadership.
And we made a large step In That direction today.
Large turnouts in MCO and BOS lec elections.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,327
What am I missing?
Email for RSA comes out stating we will be issuing RSA's shortly. Then I go in an look at my seat and equipment.. No RSA. Then I look at all the other seats and bases and do not see them issued.
Whats the deal? I have seen a few RSA's, but seems more often then not they never show up or are they never issuing them? Are people that quick to actually pick them up?
Email for RSA comes out stating we will be issuing RSA's shortly. Then I go in an look at my seat and equipment.. No RSA. Then I look at all the other seats and bases and do not see them issued.
Whats the deal? I have seen a few RSA's, but seems more often then not they never show up or are they never issuing them? Are people that quick to actually pick them up?
For the type of banter posted here? No. If I posted an accusatory screed such as the one released by "SH", well, I wouldn't make those accusations on an anonymous forum. And I wouldn't make them at all if I couldn't do it publicly. I think a lot of bourbon went into that spin job and it was followed with even more regret.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,327
30% in boston voted, Probably a step up from previous votes. However, there still 70% that apparently don't care who is running the show. I would have thought that after the recent JFK issues that more people would have voted.
What am I missing?
Email for RSA comes out stating we will be issuing RSA's shortly. Then I go in an look at my seat and equipment.. No RSA. Then I look at all the other seats and bases and do not see them issued.
Whats the deal? I have seen a few RSA's, but seems more often then not they never show up or are they never issuing them? Are people that quick to actually pick them up?
Email for RSA comes out stating we will be issuing RSA's shortly. Then I go in an look at my seat and equipment.. No RSA. Then I look at all the other seats and bases and do not see them issued.
Whats the deal? I have seen a few RSA's, but seems more often then not they never show up or are they never issuing them? Are people that quick to actually pick them up?
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Position: 190 captain and “Pro-pilot”
Posts: 2,918
For the type of banter posted here? No. If I posted an accusatory screed such as the one released by "SH", well, I wouldn't make those accusations on an anonymous forum. And I wouldn't make them at all if I couldn't do it publicly. I think a lot of bourbon went into that spin job and it was followed with even more regret.
Is it though? The diatribe was highly inflammatory and specifically accused real human beings of misconduct. It is not the same thing as the ethereal "some people", "many people" or "many, many people" who say many many things to support, well, BS. And neither of those is the same as an anonymous source that presents information that can be separately verified by other isolated means. That process lends itself to credibility. Anonymous ranting screeds do not. That can be easily remedied however.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post