Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Let Experienced Pilots Fly Act (Age 67) >

Let Experienced Pilots Fly Act (Age 67)

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Let Experienced Pilots Fly Act (Age 67)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-06-2024 | 01:18 PM
  #3981  
13n144e's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
From: 787 CA
Default

Originally Posted by Clearedtocross
Weird how you try to rephrase what I say to make it easier to argue against.
The age 67 proponents cried "pilot shortage", not me. There hasn't been a shortage since I've been here and certainly not today and yet you continue to advocate for 67 because you either didn't plan for the day you knew full well was coming or you just want more of something for yourself at the expense of others.
"You guys". Believe it or not, not everyone with a differing viewpoint of this issue from you is a card-carrying member of LEPF and don't all have the same arguments for it. Despite your stupid assumptions, you know nothing about me or why I think 67 might be a fair proposition. And I could care less what you think of the pilot shortage or frankly what you think about any other aspect because I can accept that at this point it's completely out of our control. Apparently you can't. While I won't lose sleep over this either way I am still very interested in the outcome and I'll continue to post the occasional bit of factual information about the process because that's what interests me. You can keep crying about it but I'm just not interested in engaging in your need to constantly bicker and whine about something that we no longer have any influence over. And probably never did.


Again;

https://www.politico.com/newsletters...onths-00144587

"Leaders in the House and Senate are projecting confidence that this will be the last extension needed to enact the full FAA reauthorization, combining the Senate bill, S. 1939 (118), with the House bill, H.R. 3935 (118)."

"Majority Leader Chuck Schumer has told transportation leaders that the FAA reauthorization will get exactly one shot at floor time...So when the Commerce Committee-passed bill comes to the floor, it needs to already be synced with the House version."

"Staffers on both sides of the aisle and both ends of the Capitol are working hard to reconcile the differences between the two bills on things like pilot retirement age and the number of flights in and out of the airport most convenient to the Capitol."
Old 03-06-2024 | 01:54 PM
  #3982  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2024
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
From: B737FO
Default

Originally Posted by 13n144e
"You guys". Believe it or not, not everyone with a differing viewpoint of this issue from you is a card-carrying member of LEPF and don't all have the same arguments for it. Despite your stupid assumptions, you know nothing about me or why I think 67 might be a fair proposition. And I could care less what you think of the pilot shortage or frankly what you think about any other aspect because I can accept that at this point it's completely out of our control. Apparently you can't. While I won't lose sleep over this either way I am still very interested in the outcome and I'll continue to post the occasional bit of factual information about the process because that's what interests me. You can keep crying about it but I'm just not interested in engaging in your need to constantly bicker and whine about something that we no longer have any influence over. And probably never did.


Again;

https://www.politico.com/newsletters...onths-00144587





"Leaders in the House and Senate are projecting confidence that this will be the last extension needed to enact the full FAA reauthorization, combining the Senate bill, S. 1939 (118), with the House bill, H.R. 3935 (118)."

"Majority Leader Chuck Schumer has told transportation leaders that the FAA reauthorization will get exactly one shot at floor time...So when the Commerce Committee-passed bill comes to the floor, it needs to already be synced with the House version."

"Staffers on both sides of the aisle and both ends of the Capitol are working hard to reconcile the differences between the two bills on things like pilot retirement age and the number of flights in and out of the airport most convenient to the Capitol."




Your posts are factual, most of us just want the facts, not a bunch of whining emotional crybabies on why age 67 isn't "fair".

Last edited by Stretch45; 03-06-2024 at 02:06 PM.
Old 03-06-2024 | 02:07 PM
  #3983  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2023
Posts: 541
Likes: 143
Default

Originally Posted by 13n144e
"You guys". Believe it or not, not everyone with a differing viewpoint of this issue from you is a card-carrying member of LEPF and don't all have the same arguments for it. Despite your stupid assumptions, you know nothing about me or why I think 67 might be a fair proposition. And I could care less what you think of the pilot shortage or frankly what you think about any other aspect because I can accept that at this point it's completely out of our control. Apparently you can't. While I won't lose sleep over this either way I am still very interested in the outcome and I'll continue to post the occasional bit of factual information about the process because that's what interests me. You can keep crying about it but I'm just not interested in engaging in your need to constantly bicker and whine about something that we no longer have any influence over. And probably never did.


Again;

https://www.politico.com/newsletters...onths-00144587

"Leaders in the House and Senate are projecting confidence that this will be the last extension needed to enact the full FAA reauthorization, combining the Senate bill, S. 1939 (118), with the House bill, H.R. 3935 (118)."

"Majority Leader Chuck Schumer has told transportation leaders that the FAA reauthorization will get exactly one shot at floor time...So when the Commerce Committee-passed bill comes to the floor, it needs to already be synced with the House version."

"Staffers on both sides of the aisle and both ends of the Capitol are working hard to reconcile the differences between the two bills on things like pilot retirement age and the number of flights in and out of the airport most convenient to the Capitol."
I didn't say "You guys" but there you are quoting it. You consistently recharacterise other people's words so that you can try to argue them. It's your only way to "win".
I don't hear anyone whining on here, just pointing out your behaviors. You earned it and better get used to it.

Last edited by Clearedtocross; 03-06-2024 at 02:18 PM.
Old 03-06-2024 | 02:09 PM
  #3984  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2023
Posts: 541
Likes: 143
Default

Originally Posted by Stretch45
Your posts are factual, most of us just want the facts, not a bunch of whining emotional crybabies on why age 67 isn't "fair".
Stretch thinks it's good - The kiss of death!
Old 03-06-2024 | 02:19 PM
  #3985  
Meme In Command's Avatar
Leaves Biscoff crumbs
Veteran: Army
Loved
On Reserve
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 3,265
Likes: 941
From: Blue Juice Taste Tester
Default

Originally Posted by Stretch45
Your posts are factual, most of us just want the facts, not a bunch of whining emotional crybabies on why age 67 isn't "fair".
By "crybabies" you must be speaking of the:
"Pay your dues!'
"Sling my gear, JuNiOr!'
"AlLpO screwed us"
"I lost my pension almost 2 decades ago and fail to accept my new reality and I didn't adjust my standard of living so I can't 'afford' to retire even though I've made millions of dollars since then, have a frozen pension, a 401k and probably a house I bought for a penny, a napkin and a potato chip!"
Old 03-06-2024 | 02:32 PM
  #3986  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2024
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
From: B737FO
Default

Originally Posted by Meme In Command
By "crybabies" you must be speaking of the:
"Pay your dues!'
"Sling my gear, JuNiOr!'
"AlLpO screwed us"
"I lost my pension almost 2 decades ago and fail to accept my new reality and I didn't adjust my standard of living so I can't 'afford' to retire even though I've made millions of dollars since then, have a frozen pension, a 401k and probably a house I bought for a penny, a napkin and a potato chip!"

Actually, none applies.

Last edited by Stretch45; 03-06-2024 at 03:12 PM.
Old 03-06-2024 | 03:06 PM
  #3987  
ugleeual's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,071
Likes: 63
From: 767/757 CA
Default

Did they punt to May 10th?
Old 03-06-2024 | 03:14 PM
  #3988  
Airhoss's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,738
Likes: 5
From: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
Default

Originally Posted by Clearedtocross
I didn't say "You guys" but there you are quoting it. You consistently recharacterise other people's words so that you can try to argue them. It's your only way to "win".
I don't hear anyone whining on here, just pointing out your behaviors. You earned it and better get used to it.
This coming from a guy/girl/ non bianary/ cat gender member who has absolutely falsely accused, assumed and completely mischaracterized multiple posts on this thread! My strong recommendation is to go get yourself a big ol cup of shut your trap.

Just a friendly PSA.
Old 03-06-2024 | 04:36 PM
  #3989  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2023
Posts: 541
Likes: 143
Default

Originally Posted by Airhoss
This coming from a guy/girl/ non bianary/ cat gender member who has absolutely falsely accused, assumed and completely mischaracterized multiple posts on this thread! My strong recommendation is to go get yourself a big ol cup of shut your trap.

Just a friendly PSA.
Thanks for the tip!
And it's a badge of honor to have the 67s dislike me, so I thank you for that as well!
Old 03-06-2024 | 04:37 PM
  #3990  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 618
Likes: 159
Default

Originally Posted by Airhoss
This coming from a guy/girl/ non bianary/ cat gender member who has absolutely falsely accused, assumed and completely mischaracterized multiple posts on this thread! My strong recommendation is to go get yourself a big ol cup of shut your trap.

Just a friendly PSA.

Why bring pronouns into this? I think the point was he was lumping him into a group, not the correct use of pronouns.
I am going to make some assumptions. You were born prior to 1970 (before 1964 more accurately) and make about 2-3 pronoun comments a day.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201736
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
astroglydenn
Flexjet
6
05-16-2018 03:49 AM
32LTangoTen
Regional
0
08-19-2012 01:47 PM
RPC Unity
Union Talk
149
06-30-2011 08:39 PM
BIGBROWNDC8
Cargo
7
10-22-2007 03:33 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices