Work Slow-Down at AA???
#61
I personally appreciate flying with a capt that taxis very slowly. It gives me time to do the checklist without rushing. I'll also have time to look around and see if he or she is going to fly out onto an active runway. If its rushed my heads down all the time doing the checklist, etc. I'll look say where the heck are we now. Not great for situational awarness. Easier on me too. Oh, yeah and I liking blocking up the time too
PS. I can't wait see how slow the taxis are MAY 2 hahe

PS. I can't wait see how slow the taxis are MAY 2 hahe
#62
On Reserve
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
"We'll gladly stop to accomadate you"? No you wont, the capt will call the atc facility and complain someone was getting preferential service. AAL does have the slowest taxi rate in the industry and also the highest complainers rate to atc. AAL gives atc problems almost anywhere they fly with the slow taxi speeds, complaining when we let someone go past you, wanting to push when you don't have your #'s, or we'll have our #'s when we get to the end as you slow ever more and still don't have your #'s. Other airlines wonder why atc just doesn't always put AAL at the back instead of letting them be a roadblock. The reason we don't is AAL thinks they are doing nothing wrong and are the 1st to complain about their "perceived preferential teatment" which means paperwork, pulling tapes, talking to the controllers involved. There is no one outside AAL that doesn't think they are the slowest in the industry.
#63
See my above post... Our numbers get put in by the crew chiefs, who sometimes take awhile, especially if we're full. SWA obviously has a system where the crew chiefs/load agents can put in the stuff quickly, before push. It obviously works.
I once had a SWA pilot on the MD80 jumpseat, pulling into C12 at DFW. We had to stop short awaiting marshallers. When they came out, they came at a SNAIL'S pace, showing no motivation whatsoever in parking our jet. The SWA guy could not believe it! I guess at SWA, they come running out, if they're not already in place. I explained to him that at companies like SWA, there is motivation to get the job done quickly and efficiently. That has never really been the case here.
I once had a SWA pilot on the MD80 jumpseat, pulling into C12 at DFW. We had to stop short awaiting marshallers. When they came out, they came at a SNAIL'S pace, showing no motivation whatsoever in parking our jet. The SWA guy could not believe it! I guess at SWA, they come running out, if they're not already in place. I explained to him that at companies like SWA, there is motivation to get the job done quickly and efficiently. That has never really been the case here.
#64
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,949
Likes: 9
"We'll gladly stop to accomadate you"? No you wont, the capt will call the atc facility and complain someone was getting preferential service. AAL does have the slowest taxi rate in the industry and also the highest complainers rate to atc. AAL gives atc problems almost anywhere they fly with the slow taxi speeds, complaining when we let someone go past you, wanting to push when you don't have your #'s, or we'll have our #'s when we get to the end as you slow ever more and still don't have your #'s. Other airlines wonder why atc just doesn't always put AAL at the back instead of letting them be a roadblock. The reason we don't is AAL thinks they are doing nothing wrong and are the 1st to complain about their "perceived preferential teatment" which means paperwork, pulling tapes, talking to the controllers involved. There is no one outside AAL that doesn't think they are the slowest in the industry.
I for one do not complain when someone is put ahead of us. I have heard and flown with some CAs who have complained, to which I always respond that we're paid by the minute.
Go ahead, put us in the back of the pack. You won't hear a peep outta me!
73
#65
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,541
Likes: 87
From: Road construction signholder
Years ago it was rumored that NWA management told the pilots to use the whole runway for deceleration to save brakes. At least that was the rumors I heard. I never heard anyone complain or even question that.
Just last friday our union and company petitioned the FAA for an extension on our ASAP program. Currently our company AA wants to be able to discharge or fire our pilots for ASAP reports. They currently cannot discharge other employee groups (mechanics and rampers) for ASAP infractions. Our union feels that if we agree to this, that the company will then change the other work groups asap's to include termination.
Our system chief pilot is not current on any piece of equip. He has no respect form the pilots.
We do not have a deadhead policy and can be deadheaded anywhere globally that AA flies to or from in coach while one or all of the flight attendants are in first class.
#66
fbh
#67
Herk thanks for posting.
At AA we have no deadhead policy. I know UAl's is 4 hrs or less coach, more than 4 hrs Bus or better.
At AA whoever checks in for the flight first gets Business or on 777 first class.
That includes all flight attendants and non-revs, if it's a flight attendant commuting in to base, they get thru privileges to go ahead of the pilots.
Out of Miami there are many trips to deep South America where the crew deadheads at 8pm or 8:30 pm and flys the all nighter back the next night.
Yep, 16 hours on the ground and fly home.
Some pilots love it, I hate it.
There are many stories of flight attendants racing to the airport in say Santiago Chile to beat the pilots to get Business class deadheads for the flight home.
We have asked the Cheif Pilot VP ops to adopt a deadhead policy, he says he can't (read between lines afraid of FA's union)
Our Chief pilot says his brother is a 757 CA at NWA, when asked what NWA's deadhead policy was, he responded he didn't know.
How hard is it to call your brother.
At AA we have no deadhead policy. I know UAl's is 4 hrs or less coach, more than 4 hrs Bus or better.
At AA whoever checks in for the flight first gets Business or on 777 first class.
That includes all flight attendants and non-revs, if it's a flight attendant commuting in to base, they get thru privileges to go ahead of the pilots.
Out of Miami there are many trips to deep South America where the crew deadheads at 8pm or 8:30 pm and flys the all nighter back the next night.
Yep, 16 hours on the ground and fly home.
Some pilots love it, I hate it.
There are many stories of flight attendants racing to the airport in say Santiago Chile to beat the pilots to get Business class deadheads for the flight home.
We have asked the Cheif Pilot VP ops to adopt a deadhead policy, he says he can't (read between lines afraid of FA's union)
Our Chief pilot says his brother is a 757 CA at NWA, when asked what NWA's deadhead policy was, he responded he didn't know.
How hard is it to call your brother.
#69
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,541
Likes: 87
From: Road construction signholder
"No deadhead will be booked on the jumpseat."
"A pilot who deadheads on an ocean crossing flight segment, as scheduled or rerouted, will be (emphasis added) provided business class accommodations. If the aircraft is not configured with business class, such pilot will be provided first class accommodations."
Good luck in everything.
#70
The union is aware of it, and i'm not sure if it is part of our 2008 contract proposal. A deadhead policy. I just looked and didn't see a proposal.
We have the " "No deadhead will be booked on the jumpseat."
But nothing else.
We at AA are on a 1997 contract of which there was no hourly pay raise since 1992.
There never was a 2000 contract, we voted it down on Aug 31 2001 because it only matched DAL or UAL pay rates with no other contract enhancements.
Don Carty was CEO at that time.
In 2003 as most people know we took a 23% pay cut and gave up tons of other work rule concessions.
I'm off to write some e-mails to find out why it's not in the negotiating proposals.
See ya.
We have the " "No deadhead will be booked on the jumpseat."
But nothing else.
We at AA are on a 1997 contract of which there was no hourly pay raise since 1992.
There never was a 2000 contract, we voted it down on Aug 31 2001 because it only matched DAL or UAL pay rates with no other contract enhancements.
Don Carty was CEO at that time.
In 2003 as most people know we took a 23% pay cut and gave up tons of other work rule concessions.
I'm off to write some e-mails to find out why it's not in the negotiating proposals.
See ya.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



