Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Delta Pilots Association >

Delta Pilots Association

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Delta Pilots Association

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-20-2010, 07:22 PM
  #151  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: 320B
Posts: 781
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot View Post

...Two, is to understand that the best way to deal with this is to shrink the regionals. This can be done many ways, but the best is to make sure you vote you position on any contract "improvement" that sells more flying. Do not feed the problem. Three, unity means all pilots. It is not convenient nor easy. It means working with them to give them a career after you take their job and move it back to mainline. Unity at all ranks would solve a lot of it. It is not the quick solution it is the lasting solution. .

Didn't we have just the opportunity to do this with Compass and our own union couldn't even get the issue looked at. The only thing that I remember hearing was "We can't do that flying because we are too expensive". It may have been muttered somewhere, but I never heard someone say "well, this is a difficult situation, but how can we work with the company to recapture that flying".
1234 is offline  
Old 09-20-2010, 07:26 PM
  #152  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot View Post
What I am saying is that we have unionized labor at National. If we are stating that their pay is to high and the best solution is to dump them it makes us no better than a company that opts to outsource its jobs to a lower option.
I'll say this again. The fact that ALPA is a bloated and ineffective bureaucracy is the least of their problem in my eyes. Once again, it is the conflict of interest. The conflict between me as a pilot for a major being represented by a national organization that has made the calculation that the future is with the regionals.

Originally Posted by acl65pilot View Post
That is your opinion. I understand the angst or fear but disagree with the ability to fix it.
Nothing to do with fear and angst. No matter how many times you say that, it won't make it true. You're performing a tried and true tactic that is currently being used by those who slam the Tea Party. Once again, not fear and angst. Once again, it is conflict of interest.

Originally Posted by acl65pilot View Post
The first step is not to fan their flames by selling them out.
Another mischaracterization. I don't want to sell them out. I want them fired. I know selling out makes the movement sound cowardly and negative. I hope the guys in DPA are at least getting a handle on the talking points.

It would really be nice if we could honestly debate this without the blatant and purposeful slander and mischaracterization. Maybe we can't, but it would be nice.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 09-20-2010, 07:26 PM
  #153  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: 320B
Posts: 781
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp View Post
It's all good. I remember at a couple LEC meetings our illustrious former LEC leadership fervently justified that scope concessions had nothing to do with that reduction in pilot jobs.

Oh..and that massive article on how any scope reclaimation is a pipe dream in a recent DALPA magazine.

And now I'm getting angry again just thinking about it.

That reminds me of the constant claims that "Hi-time flying does not affect staffing" while we had many pilots out on furlough.
1234 is offline  
Old 09-20-2010, 07:28 PM
  #154  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot View Post

In reality I could go on and on about the total structure of ALPA. What you and most have an issue with is the bureaucratic bs that seems to be clogging the wheels. That is fixable with a effort of the masses for massive by-law and policy manual rewrite. Heck get a leader that wants what you want, you he can do your heavy lifting. That take one BOD meeting to fix.
This is the only thing I am going to respond to in your post because it is the crux of my frustration. No sir they cannot be fixed because of the nature of the bureaucratic animal that the national association has become. THAT is a fact, and one you cannot dispute. You can wave the flag and get all patriotic (metaphorically speaking) but the fact is that the beast now lives to eat. Nothing more. I cannot even begin to imagine the complexities involved in a policy manual rewrite nevermind that the powerful ones would stop at NOTHING to maintain the status quo. Nope same ole same ole.. nothing will change... EVER. The more I write, the more disgusted I become at the whole thing.. I'm going to bed... hopefully I can sleep.
tsquare is offline  
Old 09-20-2010, 07:28 PM
  #155  
Gets Weekends Off
 
newKnow's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: 765-A
Posts: 6,844
Default

I wonder what does a future Delta Pilots Association (DPA) do with the leaders we have elected in the past that is different than what DALPA has done with the leaders we had? My point is that I believe National ALPA and ALPA's problems are people and unless I'm missing something, DPA would have elected the same people they did for DALPA and the results would have largely been the same.

I mean sure, it is obvious that National ALPA has a huge conflict of interest with the RJ drain. But, isn't it up the the individual MEC's to determine the course and priorities of their negotiations when the time comes. Isn't CAL/UAL doing that exact thing right now?

Yes, national ALPA dropped the ball on pensions and age 65 and a few other things. But, we (and I use that word loosely) voted everything else in ourselves and our MEC's allowed it. I think we are our own worst enemy, not some organization. We allow our elections to be focused on popularity contests, not issues. We worry that the more "radical" candidates may be too radical and might bring the company down. We don't participate. And when we try to participate, we are shot down or ignored because we don't "know the right people."

While there are more than a few instances where DALPA did (or, didn't do something) that have occurred over the past few years that have made me more than a little mad, it is important for DPA to explain how they would behave differently if they were in place with the same elected leaders that DALPA had at the time.* If they can't, I don't see why their efforts aren't made towards putting different people in the right positions at DALPA and ALPA National.


New K

* What would DPA have done to save our pensions back in bankruptcy?
* What would DPA have done to keep Age 65 legislation from passing?
* What does DPA do that UAL/CAL MEC's aren't doing now to get rid of rj's?
* What does DPA do to mend the new rest rule proposal?

Last edited by newKnow; 09-20-2010 at 08:18 PM.
newKnow is offline  
Old 09-20-2010, 07:32 PM
  #156  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by 1234 View Post
That reminds me of the constant claims that "Hi-time flying does not affect staffing" while we had many pilots out on furlough.
This is exactly what I was referring to in my first posts. Everyone knows BS when they hear it. It just doesn't pass the personal logic test. As this process moves forward, I advocate paying attention to your own personal sense of logic. The guys with something to hide almost always need tortured and twisted logic to get you to understand.

Don't let anyone try to jive you into something that just doesn't seem right to you.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 09-20-2010, 07:33 PM
  #157  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by Check Essential View Post
Except the dues will be half what they are now. That's the reward.
Serious money.
Southwest and American pilots pay half what we pay.
It's not the money... But you do bring up a great point. How on earth can AA and SWA survive without ALPA national? Boggles my mind.
tsquare is offline  
Old 09-20-2010, 07:34 PM
  #158  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare View Post
This is the only thing I am going to respond to in your post because it is the crux of my frustration. No sir they cannot be fixed because of the nature of the bureaucratic animal that the national association has become. THAT is a fact, and one you cannot dispute. You can wave the flag and get all patriotic (metaphorically speaking) but the fact is that the beast now lives to eat. Nothing more. I cannot even begin to imagine the complexities involved in a policy manual rewrite nevermind that the powerful ones would stop at NOTHING to maintain the status quo. Nope same ole same ole.. nothing will change... EVER. The more I write, the more disgusted I become at the whole thing.. I'm going to bed... hopefully I can sleep.
Just say over and over again...

Vols 72
Gators 0

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 09-20-2010, 07:35 PM
  #159  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot View Post
Because they get to use the coattails of ALPA for many things. Kill ALPA and that will change because the coattails will no longer be there. They too benefit from ALPA if they or you admit it or not.

So who's the smart one here? Why don't WE use the coattails of ALPA? I'm tired of paying for everybody else's party. My point was that we could write a check for whatever we need. If there is a giant sucking sound at the national coffers, I'd give you pretty good odds that they wouldn't turn any body down. I'll bet they won't turn anybody down NOW.
tsquare is offline  
Old 09-20-2010, 07:48 PM
  #160  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot View Post
Ok I propose, what would you guys demand of a DPA leader vis a vis a DALPA and or ALPA leader? What do you want changed that cannot be changed here?

What are you willing to pay to have the National services "outsourced" to contract companies to give you the same level of support that ALPA does?

What says this DPA will solve the ills that ALPA has? Is there a way that you can guarantee it will not succumb to the same fate? (look at the APA infighting)

Frankly I am curious! No really.
That is classic ALPA response to any questioning of the status quo. "What are you willing to pay?"

I want a leader that represents the needs of DELTA pilots.. NOT Comair... or Republic or even FEDEX or United... Since I believe you used the word (fear) of 55K pilots as a basis for this discussion, I would like for you to explain who exactly is supposed to be afraid of those 55K pilots.... would that be the gubbamint? the same gubbamint that WILL NOT ALLOW us to use the right to strike because we are a de facto national utility? Managements of the individual companies? Really? You want to try that line?

Can I guarantee that a new union would not succumb to the same fate as ALPA? No.. but I sure as hell would have real access to the leadership. Tell ya what.. I will try to call Prater when I get back, and I'll let you know how that works out. If he takes my call, I will eat crow without Tabasco.

But... for what we are paying right now, I know we can do better than we are. Period. That simple. Do I have those numbers? Of course not, but I am willing to open the phone book and start calling.
tsquare is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lbell911
Regional
23
04-22-2012 10:33 AM
WatchThis!
Major
68
07-13-2008 08:12 AM
757Driver
Mergers and Acquisitions
190
04-19-2008 11:27 AM
WatchThis!
Mergers and Acquisitions
2
04-14-2008 07:25 PM
RockBottom
Major
5
04-13-2006 05:14 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices