Delta Pilots Association
#151
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: 320B
Posts: 781
...Two, is to understand that the best way to deal with this is to shrink the regionals. This can be done many ways, but the best is to make sure you vote you position on any contract "improvement" that sells more flying. Do not feed the problem. Three, unity means all pilots. It is not convenient nor easy. It means working with them to give them a career after you take their job and move it back to mainline. Unity at all ranks would solve a lot of it. It is not the quick solution it is the lasting solution. .
Didn't we have just the opportunity to do this with Compass and our own union couldn't even get the issue looked at. The only thing that I remember hearing was "We can't do that flying because we are too expensive". It may have been muttered somewhere, but I never heard someone say "well, this is a difficult situation, but how can we work with the company to recapture that flying".
#152
Another mischaracterization. I don't want to sell them out. I want them fired. I know selling out makes the movement sound cowardly and negative. I hope the guys in DPA are at least getting a handle on the talking points.
It would really be nice if we could honestly debate this without the blatant and purposeful slander and mischaracterization. Maybe we can't, but it would be nice.
Carl
#153
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: 320B
Posts: 781
It's all good. I remember at a couple LEC meetings our illustrious former LEC leadership fervently justified that scope concessions had nothing to do with that reduction in pilot jobs.
Oh..and that massive article on how any scope reclaimation is a pipe dream in a recent DALPA magazine.
And now I'm getting angry again just thinking about it.
Oh..and that massive article on how any scope reclaimation is a pipe dream in a recent DALPA magazine.
And now I'm getting angry again just thinking about it.
That reminds me of the constant claims that "Hi-time flying does not affect staffing" while we had many pilots out on furlough.
#154
In reality I could go on and on about the total structure of ALPA. What you and most have an issue with is the bureaucratic bs that seems to be clogging the wheels. That is fixable with a effort of the masses for massive by-law and policy manual rewrite. Heck get a leader that wants what you want, you he can do your heavy lifting. That take one BOD meeting to fix.
#155
I wonder what does a future Delta Pilots Association (DPA) do with the leaders we have elected in the past that is different than what DALPA has done with the leaders we had? My point is that I believe National ALPA and ALPA's problems are people and unless I'm missing something, DPA would have elected the same people they did for DALPA and the results would have largely been the same.
I mean sure, it is obvious that National ALPA has a huge conflict of interest with the RJ drain. But, isn't it up the the individual MEC's to determine the course and priorities of their negotiations when the time comes. Isn't CAL/UAL doing that exact thing right now?
Yes, national ALPA dropped the ball on pensions and age 65 and a few other things. But, we (and I use that word loosely) voted everything else in ourselves and our MEC's allowed it. I think we are our own worst enemy, not some organization. We allow our elections to be focused on popularity contests, not issues. We worry that the more "radical" candidates may be too radical and might bring the company down. We don't participate. And when we try to participate, we are shot down or ignored because we don't "know the right people."
While there are more than a few instances where DALPA did (or, didn't do something) that have occurred over the past few years that have made me more than a little mad, it is important for DPA to explain how they would behave differently if they were in place with the same elected leaders that DALPA had at the time.* If they can't, I don't see why their efforts aren't made towards putting different people in the right positions at DALPA and ALPA National.
New K
* What would DPA have done to save our pensions back in bankruptcy?
* What would DPA have done to keep Age 65 legislation from passing?
* What does DPA do that UAL/CAL MEC's aren't doing now to get rid of rj's?
* What does DPA do to mend the new rest rule proposal?
I mean sure, it is obvious that National ALPA has a huge conflict of interest with the RJ drain. But, isn't it up the the individual MEC's to determine the course and priorities of their negotiations when the time comes. Isn't CAL/UAL doing that exact thing right now?
Yes, national ALPA dropped the ball on pensions and age 65 and a few other things. But, we (and I use that word loosely) voted everything else in ourselves and our MEC's allowed it. I think we are our own worst enemy, not some organization. We allow our elections to be focused on popularity contests, not issues. We worry that the more "radical" candidates may be too radical and might bring the company down. We don't participate. And when we try to participate, we are shot down or ignored because we don't "know the right people."
While there are more than a few instances where DALPA did (or, didn't do something) that have occurred over the past few years that have made me more than a little mad, it is important for DPA to explain how they would behave differently if they were in place with the same elected leaders that DALPA had at the time.* If they can't, I don't see why their efforts aren't made towards putting different people in the right positions at DALPA and ALPA National.
New K
* What would DPA have done to save our pensions back in bankruptcy?
* What would DPA have done to keep Age 65 legislation from passing?
* What does DPA do that UAL/CAL MEC's aren't doing now to get rid of rj's?
* What does DPA do to mend the new rest rule proposal?
Last edited by newKnow; 09-20-2010 at 08:18 PM.
#156
Don't let anyone try to jive you into something that just doesn't seem right to you.
Carl
#157
It's not the money... But you do bring up a great point. How on earth can AA and SWA survive without ALPA national? Boggles my mind.
#158
This is the only thing I am going to respond to in your post because it is the crux of my frustration. No sir they cannot be fixed because of the nature of the bureaucratic animal that the national association has become. THAT is a fact, and one you cannot dispute. You can wave the flag and get all patriotic (metaphorically speaking) but the fact is that the beast now lives to eat. Nothing more. I cannot even begin to imagine the complexities involved in a policy manual rewrite nevermind that the powerful ones would stop at NOTHING to maintain the status quo. Nope same ole same ole.. nothing will change... EVER. The more I write, the more disgusted I become at the whole thing.. I'm going to bed... hopefully I can sleep.
Vols 72
Gators 0
Carl
#159
So who's the smart one here? Why don't WE use the coattails of ALPA? I'm tired of paying for everybody else's party. My point was that we could write a check for whatever we need. If there is a giant sucking sound at the national coffers, I'd give you pretty good odds that they wouldn't turn any body down. I'll bet they won't turn anybody down NOW.
#160
Ok I propose, what would you guys demand of a DPA leader vis a vis a DALPA and or ALPA leader? What do you want changed that cannot be changed here?
What are you willing to pay to have the National services "outsourced" to contract companies to give you the same level of support that ALPA does?
What says this DPA will solve the ills that ALPA has? Is there a way that you can guarantee it will not succumb to the same fate? (look at the APA infighting)
Frankly I am curious! No really.
What are you willing to pay to have the National services "outsourced" to contract companies to give you the same level of support that ALPA does?
What says this DPA will solve the ills that ALPA has? Is there a way that you can guarantee it will not succumb to the same fate? (look at the APA infighting)
Frankly I am curious! No really.
I want a leader that represents the needs of DELTA pilots.. NOT Comair... or Republic or even FEDEX or United... Since I believe you used the word (fear) of 55K pilots as a basis for this discussion, I would like for you to explain who exactly is supposed to be afraid of those 55K pilots.... would that be the gubbamint? the same gubbamint that WILL NOT ALLOW us to use the right to strike because we are a de facto national utility? Managements of the individual companies? Really? You want to try that line?
Can I guarantee that a new union would not succumb to the same fate as ALPA? No.. but I sure as hell would have real access to the leadership. Tell ya what.. I will try to call Prater when I get back, and I'll let you know how that works out. If he takes my call, I will eat crow without Tabasco.
But... for what we are paying right now, I know we can do better than we are. Period. That simple. Do I have those numbers? Of course not, but I am willing to open the phone book and start calling.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lbell911
Regional
23
04-22-2012 10:33 AM