Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

DTW Roadshow

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-02-2012, 06:22 PM
  #81  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Default

The DTW reps voted against the TA, but failed to be present at the roadshow in their own council to explain their viewpoint? Epic fail.

The excuse given is sad. The excuse given by some of the supporters even more so. They were asked not to be present? And they complied? Double-fault.

If you're being driven away from a meeting in your own council, or you find it important to attend other events, or fly a trip, you've got no excuse.
Sink r8 is offline  
Old 06-02-2012, 06:24 PM
  #82  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Capt
Posts: 2,041
Default

Originally Posted by Sink r8
The DTW reps voted against the TA, but failed to be present at the roadshow in their own council to explain their viewpoint? Epic fail.

The excuse given is sad. The excuse given by some of the supporters even more so. They were asked not to be present? And they complied? Double-fault.

If you're being driven away from a meeting in your own council, or you find it important to attend other events, or fly a trip, you've got no excuse.
Maybe all the FPL is being spent on IV
boog123 is offline  
Old 06-02-2012, 07:56 PM
  #83  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MrBojangles's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 560
Default

Originally Posted by fly2002
the company will purchase 717s because they need them.

The company will park 50 seater's because they will have to.

Managment must run this company profitablly. It just so happens to favor us now.

Yes voters...you are literally giving away something for free.

Please connect the dots guys. The 717 purchase has nothing to do with parking 50 seater's sooner. They can do that with our current contract. Nothing stops them.

They'd just like to do what they were gonna do anyways and get you to sign off on crap wages and additional 76 seater's.
exactly!!!
MrBojangles is offline  
Old 06-03-2012, 12:09 AM
  #84  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Fly4hire's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: Left, left, left right left....
Posts: 911
Default

Originally Posted by Sink r8
The DTW reps voted against the TA, but failed to be present at the roadshow in their own council to explain their viewpoint? Epic fail.

The excuse given is sad. The excuse given by some of the supporters even more so. They were asked not to be present? And they complied? Double-fault.

If you're being driven away from a meeting in your own council, or you find it important to attend other events, or fly a trip, you've got no excuse.
Fire, ready, aim. Did you call or write your reps? I did. The roadshow was scheduled on barely a weeks notice. Capt was on left coast looking after an ailing parent, planned, well in advance, FO was at a planned reunion, and ST was out flying trying to wrap up consolidation on a new acft. The roadshows are informational, not editorial or a political forum, and I'm very pleased with the written explanations for their votes.
Fly4hire is offline  
Old 06-03-2012, 03:55 AM
  #85  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CVG767A's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2005
Position: 767ER capt
Posts: 1,190
Default

Originally Posted by More Bacon
I'm under the impression over half of DTW has already submitted DPA cards (along with MSP).

I can't imagine DTW rolling over for this TA. Sure, a several of the safe "yes" voters showed up today--DALPA's "rent-a-crowd". However, I'm sure a vast majority of the DTW group couldn't be bothered to waste their time on an indoctrination session.

This attempt to portray passage as inevitable is more DALPA spin; they are trying to invent peer pressure and a sense of "lost cause" that doesn't exist.

This thing is far from a done deal--especially in the former North bases.
Does anything you've posted here have a factual basis?
CVG767A is offline  
Old 06-03-2012, 04:43 AM
  #86  
Weekend and Holiday Pilot
 
Doug Masters's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: Sippin' at the Troubadour
Posts: 1,142
Default

Originally Posted by fly2002
The company will purchase 717s because they need them.

The company will park 50 seater's because they will have to.

Managment must run this company profitablly. It just so happens to favor us now.

Yes voters...you are literally giving away something for free.

Please connect the dots guys. The 717 purchase has nothing to do with parking 50 seater's sooner. They can do that with our current contract. Nothing stops them.

They'd just like to do what they were gonna do anyways and get you to sign off on crap wages and additional 76 seater's.
Amen brotha...
Doug Masters is offline  
Old 06-03-2012, 05:51 AM
  #87  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 103
Default

Originally Posted by fly2002
The company will purchase 717s because they need them.

The company will park 50 seater's because they will have to.

Managment must run this company profitablly. It just so happens to favor us now.

Yes voters...you are literally giving away something for free.

Please connect the dots guys. The 717 purchase has nothing to do with parking 50 seater's sooner. They can do that with our current contract. Nothing stops them.

They'd just like to do what they were gonna do anyways and get you to sign off on crap wages and additional 76 seater's.

YES! (why doesn't everyone get this)
kiteflyer is offline  
Old 06-03-2012, 06:05 AM
  #88  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by Fly4hire
Fire, ready, aim. Did you call or write your reps? I did. The roadshow was scheduled on barely a weeks notice. Capt was on left coast looking after an ailing parent, planned, well in advance, FO was at a planned reunion, and ST was out flying trying to wrap up consolidation on a new acft. The roadshows are informational, not editorial or a political forum, and I'm very pleased with the written explanations for their votes.
You're right about that. I'm very pleased as well.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 06-03-2012, 06:29 AM
  #89  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,530
Default

Originally Posted by fly2002
The company will purchase 717s because they need them.

The company will park 50 seater's because they will have to.

Managment must run this company profitablly. It just so happens to favor us now.

Yes voters...you are literally giving away something for free.

Please connect the dots guys. The 717 purchase has nothing to do with parking 50 seater's sooner. They can do that with our current contract. Nothing stops them.

They'd just like to do what they were gonna do anyways and get you to sign off on crap wages and additional 76 seater's.
+ 72...... The company is trying to sell us something we already own. Think, guys.
Columbia is offline  
Old 06-03-2012, 07:54 AM
  #90  
Gets Weekends Off
 
finis72's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: 777 Sim Instructor
Posts: 745
Default

Originally Posted by fly2002
The company will purchase 717s because they need them.

The company will park 50 seater's because they will have to.

Managment must run this company profitablly. It just so happens to favor us now.

Yes voters...you are literally giving away something for free.

Please connect the dots guys. The 717 purchase has nothing to do with parking 50 seater's sooner. They can do that with our current contract. Nothing stops them.

They'd just like to do what they were gonna do anyways and get you to sign off on crap wages and additional 76 seater's.
The company will only purchase 717's if this TA passes. They have a plan B and have been looking at 319's coming off leases and have already identified the 30 or so they need.

The company doesn't have to park the 50 seaters, they want to but they don't have to. DL will make huge profits with the 50 seater this year and next. Have you seen the price of oil lately? DL will also use the $400 mil cost of this TA to overhaul and renegotiate the DCI contracts.

Please connect the dots guys. This isn't a great deal but it is a good deal and if we turn it down we will be in section 6 under the NMB. This isn't a fear tactic, it's reality spawned by knowing people involved in the decision making process at DL. If it passes hiring is going to crank up in the 1st quarter, if it doesn't they will re-evaluate based on the economy. Not a fear tactic just the truth.

On the 76 seater: we gave that up 3 contracts or so ago (shame on us) and they will never come back to mainline. Our best hope is to limit the number of jets flying DCI and there by limiting the number of outsourced jobs. This TA does that.
finis72 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cencal83406
Regional
36
09-11-2011 07:16 AM
flyboy1987
Major
12
03-26-2008 05:08 AM
need2fly
Major
27
08-05-2007 11:07 AM
tsween
Hangar Talk
7
08-03-2007 02:38 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices