![]() |
Originally Posted by MagPBS
(Post 2576329)
And we are unlike any of the other airlines in the program. Remember how it went up you had to be in a Ua base and then that changed?
I would be surprised. Why would United want to help staff American’s feed? |
Originally Posted by Skyler02
(Post 2577729)
MagPBS, can you (or anyone) clarify this? Last I read you had to be flying in a United base to qualify? Does it appear that has changed?
I would be surprised. Why would United want to help staff American’s feed? |
Originally Posted by Skyler02
(Post 2577729)
MagPBS, can you (or anyone) clarify this? Last I read you had to be flying in a United base to qualify? Does it appear that has changed?
I would be surprised. Why would United want to help staff American’s feed? |
Originally Posted by calmwinds
(Post 2576314)
So, possibly a recruiting tool that never manifests itself in reality......
This is an existing program at other regionals. What and where is the hold-up? |
CPP is not going to happen, it’s just for recruitment, just like Atlanta base.
|
Originally Posted by madruski
(Post 2578344)
CPP is not going to happen, it’s just for recruitment, just like Atlanta base.
|
Originally Posted by calmwinds
(Post 2577794)
United won’t. That is why I expect this to fall through. All of the regionals flying United Express will want the CPP. If all get the CPP happens, then there won’t be anything special about Mesa’s program.
ALPA for ALPA doesn't really apply when these deals are made without Union involvement. It should apply since it was a union agenda, but I don't think it's part of the equation. |
Originally Posted by 20sx
(Post 2578568)
There's nothing special about the Mesa CPP already....CommutAir, Expressjet, and Air Wisconsin already have it. However, if we get a certain percentage of the new hire spots, then it doesn't matter if other carriers get it also. 10% (or whatever percentage) is still 10%.
ALPA for ALPA doesn't really apply when these deals are made without Union involvement. It should apply since it was a union agenda, but I don't think it's part of the equation. |
Originally Posted by calmwinds
(Post 2578602)
The only thing “special” is Mesa is trying to apply this to a non-UAX base. Not that way at any of the other regionals you mentioned.
|
Originally Posted by Sennant
(Post 2578684)
Considering the number of us with years and years of ua experience who would get shut out because we’re not in iad. It’s not about us helping aa. It’s about us helping Mesa.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:59 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands