TA
06-13-2022 | 04:17 PM
#111
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
If we vote NO that’s what the company WANTS because it will save them more money by continuing to use our current contract rates for longer. I’m a string YES vote. Pangolin is said right when he said it will take a year or more to go back and renegotiate. It is probably that the rates wouldn’t increase at all or so little it would not be worth it. The pay is not bad for MESA and we all still fly the same aircrafts we flew yesterday for MORE money so it would be ridiculous to vote no on a good deal. MESA offered us a good contract that secures our future by letting the company not spend all monies on pay rates. They have to have room to operate and make cash too. The Wholly Owned are doomed. They can’t afford to pay like that for long or they will be out of business
AA is the wholly owned. They have deep pockets, you don’t.
06-14-2022 | 08:47 AM
#114
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
If we vote NO that’s what the company WANTS because it will save them more money by continuing to use our current contract rates for longer. I’m a string YES vote. Pangolin is said right when he said it will take a year or more to go back and renegotiate. It is probably that the rates wouldn’t increase at all or so little it would not be worth it. The pay is not bad for MESA and we all still fly the same aircrafts we flew yesterday for MORE money so it would be ridiculous to vote no on a good deal. MESA offered us a good contract that secures our future by letting the company not spend all monies on pay rates. They have to have room to operate and make cash too. The Wholly Owned are doomed. They can’t afford to pay like that for long or they will be out of business
06-14-2022 | 08:51 AM
#115
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Guys, these details of everyone else’s TA coming out BEFORE we vote was a huge win for us. Could you imagine approving ours and then watching everybody else get almost double. If we vote this crap in we have nobody to blame but ourselves. We know what our competitors will be getting. They already think we are scum. Are we?
06-14-2022 | 09:25 AM
#116
Line Holder
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
If we vote NO that’s what the company WANTS because it will save them more money by continuing to use our current contract rates for longer. I’m a string YES vote. Pangolin is said right when he said it will take a year or more to go back and renegotiate. It is probably that the rates wouldn’t increase at all or so little it would not be worth it. The pay is not bad for MESA and we all still fly the same aircrafts we flew yesterday for MORE money so it would be ridiculous to vote no on a good deal. MESA offered us a good contract that secures our future by letting the company not spend all monies on pay rates. They have to have room to operate and make cash too. The Wholly Owned are doomed. They can’t afford to pay like that for long or they will be out of business
maybe JO is expecting Captains to sit FO reserve. Lol. How many are going to continue on with their training dates if they can get hired at Envoy or similar and make triple pay? Only those that failed elsewhere or have no other options will continue. Good luck!
06-14-2022 | 12:18 PM
#117
Line Holder
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
PSA just got a new TA - Vote NO Mesa TA
BREAKING:
PSA has allegedly reached an agreement with ALPA, matching Piedmont and Envoy pay rates.
Proposed First Officer Rates:
- 1st year: $90/hr
- 2nd year: $97/hr
- 3rd year: $105/hr
Proposed Captain Rates:
- 1st year: $146/hr
- 2nd year: $153/hr
- Top: $213/hr
Source: rb.gy/ypmehq
PSA has allegedly reached an agreement with ALPA, matching Piedmont and Envoy pay rates.
Proposed First Officer Rates:
- 1st year: $90/hr
- 2nd year: $97/hr
- 3rd year: $105/hr
Proposed Captain Rates:
- 1st year: $146/hr
- 2nd year: $153/hr
- Top: $213/hr
Source: rb.gy/ypmehq
06-14-2022 | 12:21 PM
#118
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Guys, these details of everyone else’s TA coming out BEFORE we vote was a huge win for us. Could you imagine approving ours and then watching everybody else get almost double. If we vote this crap in we have nobody to blame but ourselves. We know what our competitors will be getting. They already think we are scum. Are we?
Thomas Jefferson said the government you elect is the government you deserve. I think that sentiment is applicable here as well. There no question this should be a HARD no by everyone, I don’t think it’s even up for debate at this point. But if it gets voted in then it’s definitely the contract mesa pilots deserve.
06-14-2022 | 01:13 PM
#119
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
BREAKING:
PSA has allegedly reached an agreement with ALPA, matching Piedmont and Envoy pay rates.
Proposed First Officer Rates:
- 1st year: $90/hr
- 2nd year: $97/hr
- 3rd year: $105/hr
Proposed Captain Rates:
- 1st year: $146/hr
- 2nd year: $153/hr
- Top: $213/hr
Source: rb.gy/ypmehq
PSA has allegedly reached an agreement with ALPA, matching Piedmont and Envoy pay rates.
Proposed First Officer Rates:
- 1st year: $90/hr
- 2nd year: $97/hr
- 3rd year: $105/hr
Proposed Captain Rates:
- 1st year: $146/hr
- 2nd year: $153/hr
- Top: $213/hr
Source: rb.gy/ypmehq
06-14-2022 | 01:29 PM
#120
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,602
Likes: 0
BREAKING:
PSA has allegedly reached an agreement with ALPA, matching Piedmont and Envoy pay rates.
Proposed First Officer Rates:
- 1st year: $90/hr
- 2nd year: $97/hr
- 3rd year: $105/hr
Proposed Captain Rates:
- 1st year: $146/hr
- 2nd year: $153/hr
- Top: $213/hr
Source: rb.gy/ypmehq
PSA has allegedly reached an agreement with ALPA, matching Piedmont and Envoy pay rates.
Proposed First Officer Rates:
- 1st year: $90/hr
- 2nd year: $97/hr
- 3rd year: $105/hr
Proposed Captain Rates:
- 1st year: $146/hr
- 2nd year: $153/hr
- Top: $213/hr
Source: rb.gy/ypmehq
