Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > Mesa Airlines
Mesa Recalls Furloughed Pilots >

Mesa Recalls Furloughed Pilots

Search

Notices
Mesa Airlines Regional Airline

Mesa Recalls Furloughed Pilots

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-04-2010 | 08:48 PM
  #51  
Go Knights Go
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
From: OCC/Dispatch
Default

Earlier this fall UA and MAG settled a lawsuit regarding adding more 70 seaters. The settlement leaves MAG with no additional 70 seat work. UA dumped Mesa's 50 seat lift so why would they come back inquring about that?

Last edited by Releasemaster; 12-05-2010 at 07:57 AM.
Reply
Old 12-05-2010 | 07:00 AM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 732
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix
Default

exactly, and i heard it was out of iah on co side. Ya right!
Reply
Old 12-05-2010 | 07:28 AM
  #53  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by nordo
Good flying, with good folks. The grass isn't always greener elsewhere, any place you work is partly what you make it. I can understand why going back might not be the first choice for some, but for me, I've had worse jobs (albeit not many for less money..LOL ) and since I do like most of the folks I've worked with both in the "front office" and FAs, going back isn't among the worst decisions I could make. Even on reserve, the crew trackers weren't bad, they were just doing their job (a power-tripper or two occasionally, but not the rule).

Regional Airline Management doesn't seem to be too much different anywhere, I suspect that should the regionals pilots get ALPA onboard with a view to end "whipsawing" (and I get sparkly ponies for Christmas) things might improve a bit. Seriously, I suspect that things like the 1500 hour rule (no exceptions for "big" flight schools, please) will eventually lead to improvements in pay and other things as the airlines have to keep us around and treat us as Professionals, because there is no longer a pool of half-a**ed 250 hour wonders who can't pick up a clearance properly but are sure that instructing is well beneath their lot in life.

Bottom line for me anyhow, is that I miss the job, I miss the flying and the folks I worked with and I'll go back and probably become an ALPA volunteer to try and make it a better place to work for everyone there now and everyone who follows down the road.

Thank you. Well said and I had the same experience at Mesa.
Reply
Old 12-06-2010 | 10:57 AM
  #54  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
From: CRJ CA
Default

Here's the "official" word on recalls, forwarded by a friend:
Friends/Crewmembers:



Here is a little heads up on the furlough recall plan as we get it cranked up. Please share it with our furloughed colleagues when and if you speak with them. They can certainly also contact me at their convenience and I will do my best to answer questions although there are a lot of moving parts. Once we get the program under way I think it should flow smoothly. The big message being this is great news and it's rewarding to be working on it.



We met with Captain Tad H. and First Officer Collin W. from our ALPA office earlier in the week to share the official notification of the recall and outline the basic initial plan. The first phase will be to recall pilots into the D8 so as to be able to get the individuals who are presently flying the D8 but can hold the CRJ back into their CRJ FO seats. These individuals have worked hard to keep the D8 program on track and honoring their desire to get back to their jet seat is a priority.



The initial recalls will be for D8 classes in January. Presently 2 crews for January. The driver for the number of recalls is the availability of D8 simulator time strange as that sounds. The D8 is suddenly very a very popular aircraft with the military in Afghanistan and Pakistan. February and March should have 3 crews entering training. Additional recalls into the CRJ should follow the D8 recalls and will be completely dependent on attrition as it develops in 2011. FYI attrition almost 30 for this past October and 18 for November.



Early next week an informational letter will be going out to our furloughed group followed by a phone call from Alvin or Myself to answer questions. Next Friday the first furlough recall letters should go out per the provisions of "furlough recall" outlined in section 17 of the CBA. Again remembering 2 crews for January.



Furlough recall is pretty good stuff to be talking about. Can't wait to welcome our team members back to the School House.



Regards and thanks,



Mike

There ya go.
Reply
Old 12-06-2010 | 04:01 PM
  #55  
hslightnin's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 774
Likes: 0
From: EMB145
Default

Originally Posted by nordo
Here's the "official" word on recalls, forwarded by a friend:
Friends/Crewmembers:



Here is a little heads up on the furlough recall plan as we get it cranked up. Please share it with our furloughed colleagues when and if you speak with them. They can certainly also contact me at their convenience and I will do my best to answer questions although there are a lot of moving parts. Once we get the program under way I think it should flow smoothly. The big message being this is great news and it's rewarding to be working on it.



We met with Captain Tad H. and First Officer Collin W. from our ALPA office earlier in the week to share the official notification of the recall and outline the basic initial plan. The first phase will be to recall pilots into the D8 so as to be able to get the individuals who are presently flying the D8 but can hold the CRJ back into their CRJ FO seats. These individuals have worked hard to keep the D8 program on track and honoring their desire to get back to their jet seat is a priority.



The initial recalls will be for D8 classes in January. Presently 2 crews for January. The driver for the number of recalls is the availability of D8 simulator time strange as that sounds. The D8 is suddenly very a very popular aircraft with the military in Afghanistan and Pakistan. February and March should have 3 crews entering training. Additional recalls into the CRJ should follow the D8 recalls and will be completely dependent on attrition as it develops in 2011. FYI attrition almost 30 for this past October and 18 for November.



Early next week an informational letter will be going out to our furloughed group followed by a phone call from Alvin or Myself to answer questions. Next Friday the first furlough recall letters should go out per the provisions of "furlough recall" outlined in section 17 of the CBA. Again remembering 2 crews for January.



Furlough recall is pretty good stuff to be talking about. Can't wait to welcome our team members back to the School House.



Regards and thanks,



Mike

There ya go.
10 pilots recalled through march.
am i reading that correct?
Reply
Old 12-06-2010 | 04:49 PM
  #56  
TurboFan's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 282
Likes: 1
From: A320 FO
Default

Originally Posted by hslightnin
10 pilots recalled through march.
am i reading that correct?
Seems to be managements plan, but then again, when does anything they do ever go to plan?

My suspicion is that attrition will exceed the company's planned values (usually around 5 pilots a month, or something ridiculously low like that) and recalls will pick up come spring. Purely speculation, but based on years of dealing with Mesa management.
Reply
Old 12-06-2010 | 08:25 PM
  #57  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
From: Back to the Right Seat
Default

So 10 guys/gals recalled back into the d8? Wouldn't you be better off going to Eagle? At least there is some growth there. How many are still on furlough? How many will they have to go through to get 10?
Reply
Old 12-06-2010 | 08:49 PM
  #58  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
UA is not going to add 50-seat feed unless they lose their scope battle with CAL-ALPA.
It's a distinct possibility that they will lose that battle, isn't it?

I don't think there is going to be news like that until mesa is out of BK though, anyway. Once they're out, then you'll have some news to sink your teeth into - I bet. And what about those infamous 10 backlogged 700's? If 50 seaters are the problem and UA wants 10 more planes, then there's your answer, right?

Reply
Old 12-07-2010 | 06:53 AM
  #59  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,144
Likes: 801
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by PurpleCRJ
It's a distinct possibility that they will lose that battle, isn't it?

I don't think there is going to be news like that until mesa is out of BK though, anyway. Once they're out, then you'll have some news to sink your teeth into - I bet. And what about those infamous 10 backlogged 700's? If 50 seaters are the problem and UA wants 10 more planes, then there's your answer, right?

I wasn't commenting on mesa's chances of getting more flying in general. I was pointing out that UA hates 50 seaters, and only wants 70's. If they lose their argument with CAL-ALPA odds are that they will have to add 50 seaters going forward, or maybe even downsize some 70's to 50's if they really get their butt handed to them. Just saying they are not going to to be adding 50's until that debate is resolved.

But regarding mesa and UA...there's some bad blood. That could be a problem if OJ and cohorts stay in charge.

Also the engine that drove the old mesa was not low costs...in my opinion their operational stupidities ate up a lot of their cost savings. What they really had going for them was that lucrative sweetheart deal with the AW 900's. That is now reduced to what one assumes are market rates, and mesa is very small for a jet regional. Their economies of scale for overhead (training, admin, MX, management, etc) are not good, most of their peers in that size range are wholly owned. I suspect this means that mesa will not be able to automatically undercut all other bidders going forward (unless they bid flying at a loss).

It's a shame that they couldn't have pulled off a regime change...that was what I really wanted to see out of this mess.
Reply
Old 12-07-2010 | 12:35 PM
  #60  
Ferlofodder's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
From: CRJ Captain
Default

Originally Posted by nordo
Here's the "official" word on recalls, forwarded by a friend:
Friends/Crewmembers:



Here is a little heads up on the furlough recall plan as we get it cranked up. Please share it with our furloughed colleagues when and if you speak with them. They can certainly also contact me at their convenience and I will do my best to answer questions although there are a lot of moving parts. Once we get the program under way I think it should flow smoothly. The big message being this is great news and it's rewarding to be working on it.



We met with Captain Tad H. and First Officer Collin W. from our ALPA office earlier in the week to share the official notification of the recall and outline the basic initial plan. The first phase will be to recall pilots into the D8 so as to be able to get the individuals who are presently flying the D8 but can hold the CRJ back into their CRJ FO seats. These individuals have worked hard to keep the D8 program on track and honoring their desire to get back to their jet seat is a priority.



The initial recalls will be for D8 classes in January. Presently 2 crews for January. The driver for the number of recalls is the availability of D8 simulator time strange as that sounds. The D8 is suddenly very a very popular aircraft with the military in Afghanistan and Pakistan. February and March should have 3 crews entering training. Additional recalls into the CRJ should follow the D8 recalls and will be completely dependent on attrition as it develops in 2011. FYI attrition almost 30 for this past October and 18 for November.



Early next week an informational letter will be going out to our furloughed group followed by a phone call from Alvin or Myself to answer questions. Next Friday the first furlough recall letters should go out per the provisions of "furlough recall" outlined in section 17 of the CBA. Again remembering 2 crews for January.



Furlough recall is pretty good stuff to be talking about. Can't wait to welcome our team members back to the School House.



Regards and thanks,



Mike
There ya go.
I wonder what is meant by "2 crews"? Is that four pilots or is that 8 pilots per plane which might mean 16? 4 pilots seems a bit light to keep up with attrition. Mesa losing between 20 and 30 active pilots a month.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hdale
Regional
8
08-26-2021 11:49 PM
Maxclimb12
Major
1
03-18-2009 03:52 PM
Flatspin
Regional
43
02-16-2009 07:45 PM
JungleBus
Major
121
12-20-2008 04:13 PM
Jettubby
Mergers and Acquisitions
14
04-03-2008 06:56 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices