Search
Notices
Mesa Airlines Regional Airline

Mesa

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-13-2015, 08:46 AM
  #5981  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Position: Ball Turret Gunner
Posts: 297
Default .

Originally Posted by sulkair View Post
A few positives just for fun.

#1) Training

I don't know how to compare our training department to others because I've only been here, but after 10 years here, many years in the Navy and in other professional fields I am continually impressed with the degree of professionalism that the individual instructors, examiners and check-airmen exude. With rare exception they have always been extremely competent, understanding, helpful, and enjoyable.

Strangely whenever I've been in the pipeline for a transition (3 different a/c over 2 different certificates) or upgrade, or recurrent. I absolutely feel like I'm at a different company. Hell even ASAP remedial was a pleasure - sorry it's true!

You will have a solid training experience here, no doubt about it!

#2)

Chief Pilots out west are phenomenal! (Can't speak to the ones out east) These guys work their asses off for the pilot group. In many cases their hands are tied, but they persist in trying to do the right thing and are extremely fair. They are not out to get you, and are real pilot's pilots, (experienced pilots from the old school). We're dang lucky to have them, and most of us know it!

#3)

Down to earth professional crews who work hard, fly well, and act like decent human beings to one another and the people they come in contact with i.e. station personnel. Sounds mushy but we're all beat up and we know it, the only thing we truly have is each other, and so we tend to protect it, for sanity's sake.

#4)

A fleet of big RJ's.

#5)

Electronic Flight Bag! Yes, i know we have to pay for the Ipad ourselves but I don't mind because this is huge

#6)

Very good on-time/completion numbers which hopefully translates into extended contracts and future business. Please see #3 for the reason behind this.


This is not Koolaid guys. Trust me, I'm a big critic of this place, but I also know good things when I see them, and what I've mentioned in this post is the truly good, and not the only good, there is more, but this stands out for me.
24 yo m with 2200 total time. ATP 700 multi, 1000 ish PIC. 135 experience and 121 experience in E 175 Left flying to work in the Texas oil fields that are now laying off so going back to flying and insist on sticking with it. Grass is not greener always outside the cockpit ( Job security with oil prices) Looking at PSA MESA Republic or Ameriflight. Only advantage with Ameriflight is I qualify for Left seat positions and can earn pic turbine experience quicker than 121. Out of those 4 who would you pick? Thanks
milehighskyline is offline  
Old 02-13-2015, 08:53 AM
  #5982  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Posts: 555
Default

Originally Posted by Blackwing View Post
Very relevant. As it happens, all the modern browsers stopped supporting SSLv3 this month due to it having flaws. Safari and Internet Explorer still allow it, Chrome and Firefox do not. Mesa needs to fix this pronto.
Sure enough, it works in Safari.
RV5M is offline  
Old 02-13-2015, 11:23 AM
  #5983  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Posts: 580
Default

Originally Posted by Cyborgmudhen View Post
Hoookay, gotta at least try.....
Mesa peeps- you are doing it wrong.
If FaceBiter and CBreezy post something and nobody "feeds the beasts", did they actually post anything ?

Don't feed the animals if you don't want them to come back for more.
.....or continue to deal with whatever issues they have this week. Either way, the decision is yours.
Govern yourselves accordingly.
I'm with you on this but sometimes it's hard to ignore their moronic views of Mesa. Although some of their rhetoric can be fact based it has no place on the Mesa thread and never solves any of our pilot group problems.
Duct Mon is offline  
Old 02-13-2015, 12:12 PM
  #5984  
Gets Weekends Off
 
24/48's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 455
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy View Post
I'm sorry you are unable to comprehend simple analogies in a point/counter-point discussion. This is going to come across as patronizing but is clearly the only way you can understand.
Awesome display of douchebagery!

Originally Posted by CBreezy View Post
Point: Skywest hasn't set any bar and is happy enjoying the fruits of others.

Analysis: Here 24 is drawing a conclusion that the contract at Skywest (non-union) only exists in its current form due to the diligent efforts of unionized pilot groups, like Mesa. I'm making an assumption that this poorly veiled insult is disguised as "without Mesa's union and others like Mesa, Skywest would be in far worse condition."
Not sure how long you have been in the industry, but yes it is a little known fact that historically when gains were made by others through collective bargaining that the Skywest student council would "negotiate" and deliver something very similar to what the unionized carriers negotiated.

As to my conclusions as reflected in your "analysis", I don't ever recall championing the Mesa contract as a pillar of regional contracts. What I have noted is that the Mesa pilots have had to waste a lot of negotiating capitol fighting JO....Freedom Air comes to mind. They've also been through bankruptcy recently, and are currently operating under a bankruptcy agreement.

So your "analysis" is false as I was talking about ALL unionized regionals, and without ALL unionized carriers' collective efforts I would argue Skywest wouldn't have some of the things that they do in their handbook.

Originally Posted by CBreezy View Post
Counter-point: Skywest is eating fruit. Mesa is eating rotten...something.

Analysis: Keeping with the theme of fruit, I chose to make a contract comparison between the unionized Mesa with non-unionized Skywest. Skywest's contract is superior to Mesa's in almost every single way even though they don't have a proper union. Mesa's contract is one of the worst in the industry across the board with the exception of line-guarantee. I purposely left it open-ended so that one could draw the conclusion that it is silly to say that the unionized group of Mesa and their "efforts" to raise the bar has lead to Skywest's far superior contract.
Again, you make it sound as though Mesa is the scourge of the earth. They are most certainly on the lower end for regionals for reasons I've pointed out ad nauseum, but the gap between the lower and upper is thin.
24/48 is offline  
Old 02-13-2015, 12:26 PM
  #5985  
Gets Weekends Off
 
24/48's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 455
Default

Originally Posted by Paid2fly View Post
Your statements above are the cheerleading of bottom feeders being referred to.


If you weren't so completely biased, you'd realize/admit that Skywest, Air Whisky, Horizon, and ASA/Expressjet have always been far better places of employment than your wife's employer. The pay, benefits, work rules and treatment of employees at J.O.s outfit have always lagged the above, even prior to the bankruptcy you use for an excuse.
Really?!?!

Skywest: I see a lot of folks complaining about QOL, poor pairing construction, horrible schedulers, and so on. In fact, I saw a post on the Skywest thread talking about the senior guys with 15+ years getting 11-12 day off lines, awesome!

Air Whiskey: I know many at AWAC and yes they have a good deal. It doesn't change the fact that they don't have a base in IAH, and it just isn't worth it to commute for 20 something bucks an hour.

Horizon: Great place, great pay, etc. They are also all props based in the Pacific northwest or AK. Even at $40/hr vs. $29/hr at 2nd year pay it's not worth the commute.

ASA/XJT: And this was choice number 1, however, during the "Welcome to Expressjet" presentation some 2 days after the announcement that they were losing 102 ERJ's the mood was a bit sour. Base in IAH shrinking, pilot moral in the toilet as they get whipsawed by Skywest Inc., parking airplanes or transferring them to TSA. Yeah, no thanks.

Either way, the pay and benefits are just about the same across the board at the regionals with a few exceptions. Still nothing worth commuting to get. And even those with something a little better, it's really just whipped cream on $hit. And by the way, I was at ASA for 6 years and remember the "stellar" bennies we had.
24/48 is offline  
Old 02-13-2015, 12:27 PM
  #5986  
Gets Weekends Off
 
24/48's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 455
Default

Originally Posted by milehighskyline View Post
24 yo m with 2200 total time. ATP 700 multi, 1000 ish PIC. 135 experience and 121 experience in E 175 Left flying to work in the Texas oil fields that are now laying off so going back to flying and insist on sticking with it. Grass is not greener always outside the cockpit ( Job security with oil prices) Looking at PSA MESA Republic or Ameriflight. Only advantage with Ameriflight is I qualify for Left seat positions and can earn pic turbine experience quicker than 121. Out of those 4 who would you pick? Thanks
Mesa if you live in Texas.
24/48 is offline  
Old 02-13-2015, 12:34 PM
  #5987  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,067
Default

Originally Posted by 24/48 View Post
Awesome display of douchebagery!



Not sure how long you have been in the industry, but yes it is a little known fact that historically when gains were made by others through collective bargaining that the Skywest student council would "negotiate" and deliver something very similar to what the unionized carriers negotiated.

As to my conclusions as reflected in your "analysis", I don't ever recall championing the Mesa contract as a pillar of regional contracts. What I have noted is that the Mesa pilots have had to waste a lot of negotiating capitol fighting JO....Freedom Air comes to mind. They've also been through bankruptcy recently, and are currently operating under a bankruptcy agreement.

So your "analysis" is false as I was talking about ALL unionized regionals, and without ALL unionized carriers' collective efforts I would argue Skywest wouldn't have some of the things that they do in their handbook.



Again, you make it sound as though Mesa is the scourge of the earth. They are most certainly on the lower end for regionals for reasons I've pointed out ad nauseum, but the gap between the lower and upper is thin.
I don't care if you don't like what I have to say. I'm not out here attacking people who work for Mesa or trying to deprive them of their way of life. I have friends who fly for Mesa. There is no ill-will toward them. If you take what I have to say as a personal attack, then you ARE lacking reading comprehension skills.

I am well aware of the plight of Mesa. I know they have struggled with their upper management and gone through some turbulent times. If the pilots of Mesa TRULY wanted to improve their conditions, they would do far less cheerleading about how great Mesa is. That's all I ever point out. They have more negotiating capital right now than they've ever have. They don't need to slander or to picket the front door. It would be nice for some of the people who actually work at Mesa on this board to call out the people who claim that Mesa is a great place to work.

As far as your point regarding the difference between the best and the worst conditions, I disagree. While compared to a major airline contract, $9-12 an hour is nothing, there are MAJOR differences between a place like Mesa, a place like TSA, and a place like Air Wisconsin. I don't have time to run the numbers, but in compensation alone, you're looking at a possible disparity of up to $7-$12k a year. When you're only making $20-$30k, that is a statistically significant number. When you take into considering health care, disability, scheduling, retirement, and possible other soft pays, that disparity grows much much larger.

While there are growth opporunities and thus upgrade opportunities at a place like Mesa, people still need to prepare to be at a place for a minimum of 4-6 years before they get the opportunity to move to a major airline. There are outliers but I'd bet the average stay at a regional in the next 5 years will not get as low as 8 years.

Finally, with regard to unions. I know this is a hot topic. I think there are both positives and negatives to union membership in the current political enviroment. Union membership under the RLA and representation by the same organization as the people we subcontract for makes union membership almost as worthwhile as not having one at all.
CBreezy is offline  
Old 02-13-2015, 12:36 PM
  #5988  
Gets Weekends Off
 
24/48's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 455
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy View Post
Except all regional airline unions have lowered the bar over the last 5 years, whereas, the non-unionized groups (JetBlue formerly and Skywest) have not taken concessions. Now before people read 3 words of this, misread it, and like Neanderthals get angry, I'm not saying get rid of unions. I'm saying that the unions aren't raising the bar right now and therefore you can't say that "everyone else's contracts" benefits from them.
Just because it hasn't happened in the last few years doesn't mean that it didn't ever happen. I would argue that most of the language in the Skywest handbook was picked out of the ACA contract and CMR contract negotiated before 9/11. Skywest didn't take concessions because the head shed in SGU wanted to keep the masses happy. SGU also knew that if they forced concessions down on Skywest that another union drive would emerge, and may actually pass.
24/48 is offline  
Old 02-13-2015, 01:11 PM
  #5989  
Gets Weekends Off
 
24/48's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 455
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy View Post
I don't care if you don't like what I have to say. I'm not out here attacking people who work for Mesa or trying to deprive them of their way of life. I have friends who fly for Mesa. There is no ill-will toward them. If you take what I have to say as a personal attack, then you ARE lacking reading comprehension skills.
I take nothing on here personally, but you're comprehension comments come across as douchie, and I'm quite certain that if we were having this conversation in person that you would withhold these types of comments.

Originally Posted by CBreezy View Post
I am well aware of the plight of Mesa. I know they have struggled with their upper management and gone through some turbulent times. If the pilots of Mesa TRULY wanted to improve their conditions, they would do far less cheerleading about how great Mesa is. That's all I ever point out. They have more negotiating capital right now than they've ever have. They don't need to slander or to picket the front door. It would be nice for some of the people who actually work at Mesa on this board to call out the people who claim that Mesa is a great place to work.
What regional, Mesa or otherwise, has any sort of leverage right now? I'm sorry but the outsourced block hour allotments made by majors is shrinking, it's a tough market for regionals. Sorry, but regionals have very little leverage because of the portfolio of carriers the majors use. PSA, PDT, and ENY are good examples of that.

Originally Posted by CBreezy View Post
As far as your point regarding the difference between the best and the worst conditions, I disagree. While compared to a major airline contract, $9-12 an hour is nothing, there are MAJOR differences between a place like Mesa, a place like TSA, and a place like Air Wisconsin. I don't have time to run the numbers, but in compensation alone, you're looking at a possible disparity of up to $7-$12k a year. When you're only making $20-$30k, that is a statistically significant number. When you take into considering health care, disability, scheduling, retirement, and possible other soft pays, that disparity grows much much larger.
I'm not disagreeing with you, it's appalling! My point is that for many to get on with a major they have to go the regional route so pick your poison, or find another field. The reality of it sucks. Hell, I'm still paying off debt from my regional days.

Originally Posted by CBreezy View Post
While there are growth opporunities and thus upgrade opportunities at a place like Mesa, people still need to prepare to be at a place for a minimum of 4-6 years before they get the opportunity to move to a major airline. There are outliers but I'd bet the average stay at a regional in the next 5 years will not get as low as 8 years.
That's a good conservative plan. So then the individual needs to list pros and cons of where to work. Are benefits important?, Commute or not commute?, Pay?, etc. Each individual is different with different circumstances. I would contend that QOL is most important, and having to commute severely degrades that. So, is the commute worth the extra $$$? If you're young, no wife or kids then you're mobile with a small budget. If you're older, and have more responsibilities, then you're not as mobile and you have to go for what works best for you, and it's not always about $$$.

Originally Posted by CBreezy View Post
Finally, with regard to unions. I know this is a hot topic. I think there are both positives and negatives to union membership in the current political enviroment. Union membership under the RLA and representation by the same organization as the people we subcontract for makes union membership almost as worthwhile as not having one at all.
I can understand that. It has been my position for some time now that ALPA needs a re-structuring. It still doesn't change the history that Skywest has benefitted from the collective bargaining done by others. It also doesn't change the reality that by unionizing, and in particular ALPA, that the Skywest pilots would remove the whipsaw that has caused the decline at ASA/XJT.
24/48 is offline  
Old 02-13-2015, 01:22 PM
  #5990  
Gets Weekends Off
 
prior121's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2013
Position: 175 Left
Posts: 1,539
Default

Originally Posted by Cyborgmudhen View Post
Hoookay, gotta at least try.....
Mesa peeps- you are doing it wrong.
If FaceBiter and CBreezy post something and nobody "feeds the beasts", did they actually post anything ?

Don't feed the animals if you don't want them to come back for more.
.....or continue to deal with whatever issues they have this week. Either way, the decision is yours.
Govern yourselves accordingly.

*************

Last edited by prior121; 02-13-2015 at 01:36 PM.
prior121 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nwa757
Regional
31
07-31-2018 04:58 PM
AirbornPegasus
Regional
14
04-08-2009 07:17 PM
Spanky189
Regional
10
05-16-2008 09:38 AM
familyguy
Regional
49
04-11-2008 12:03 AM
LOW FUEL
Regional
104
08-17-2007 04:41 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices