Netjets latest & greatest:
#3111
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Position: e145 fo
Posts: 250
#3112
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: Furloughed
Posts: 429
#3113
Speed, Power, Accuracy
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: PIC
Posts: 1,702
From multiple sources, a mandatory retirement age via FAA regulation for the 91K/135 world is on the back burner indefinitely.
Whether the company has the stones to try a unilateral policy change and fight the inevitable class action lawsuit is another question. The answer to which I believe is NO.
Unfortunately.
Whether the company has the stones to try a unilateral policy change and fight the inevitable class action lawsuit is another question. The answer to which I believe is NO.
Unfortunately.
#3114
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Posts: 40
From multiple sources, a mandatory retirement age via FAA regulation for the 91K/135 world is on the back burner indefinitely.
Whether the company has the stones to try a unilateral policy change and fight the inevitable class action lawsuit is another question. The answer to which I believe is NO.
Unfortunately.
Whether the company has the stones to try a unilateral policy change and fight the inevitable class action lawsuit is another question. The answer to which I believe is NO.
Unfortunately.
#3115
Speed, Power, Accuracy
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: PIC
Posts: 1,702
So what age ceases to be arbitrary? 70? 80? 103?
Their rationale is that there hasn't ever been an age limit for 91K/135 and (they claim) there is no verifiable safety risk from Geritol swilling pilots. Therefore no new regulation is needed
#3116
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Posts: 40
I agree with you. But the gummers say an age limit is "arbitrary."
So what age ceases to be arbitrary? 70? 80? 103?
Their rationale is that there hasn't ever been an age limit for 91K/135 and (they claim) there is no verifiable safety risk from Geritol swilling pilots. Therefore no new regulation is needed
So what age ceases to be arbitrary? 70? 80? 103?
Their rationale is that there hasn't ever been an age limit for 91K/135 and (they claim) there is no verifiable safety risk from Geritol swilling pilots. Therefore no new regulation is needed
So basically not enough people have been killed yet to warrant serious consideration. Fkn joke. Makes you wonder what a cog test would reveal.
#3117
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jan 2014
Posts: 96
Does Netjets have recurrent training/checking requirements that would ferret out cog capabilty? I'm 71 and just umpired a college baseball double-header last night. But we have had guys age 60 that we wouldn't let near a baseball field. The age limit should not be arbitrary. Maybe I should apply, not having turned a wheel in 10 years, and show you how it is done. No, nevermind, I'm not cleaning or restocking.
#3118
Speed, Power, Accuracy
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: PIC
Posts: 1,702
Does Netjets have recurrent training/checking requirements that would ferret out cog capabilty? I'm 71 and just umpired a college baseball double-header last night. But we have had guys age 60 that we wouldn't let near a baseball field. The age limit should not be arbitrary. Maybe I should apply, not having turned a wheel in 10 years, and show you how it is done. No, nevermind, I'm not cleaning or restocking.
We have two pilots who turn EIGHTY this year. Are you willing to put YOUR family in the back of their jet?
Didn't think so.
And the answer to your very first question is: NO, we don't.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post