Search

Notices
Part 135 Part 135 commercial operators

Cape Air

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-13-2018 | 06:43 AM
  #1881  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 406
Likes: 3
From: Dream Job
Default

Originally Posted by BravoTango
You know that photo is not the new Cape Airplane right?
Yes, I was referring to the comment saying that the evektor would be better than the Tecnom.

Sent from my BTV-W09 using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 08-13-2018 | 06:51 AM
  #1882  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
Default

For the record...




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 08-13-2018 | 06:52 AM
  #1883  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
Default

More like this




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 08-13-2018 | 06:54 AM
  #1884  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
Default

It’s a bit bigger




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 08-13-2018 | 06:54 AM
  #1885  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by tlove482
Yes, I was referring to the comment saying that the evektor would be better than the Tecnom.

Sent from my BTV-W09 using Tapatalk
It’s a little bigger

Reply
Old 08-13-2018 | 07:36 AM
  #1886  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by BravoTango
You know that photo is not the new Cape Airplane right?
My bad, you are correct ....
Reply
Old 08-13-2018 | 08:01 AM
  #1887  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by tlove482
I don't think it fits the mission. Pistols fit better for how they fly. You don't need a turbine twin for a 15 minute flight. It also allows them to outbid other operators for eas routes.

Sent from my BTV-W09 using Tapatalk
Glendive to Billings ... 80 minutes

Havre to Billings ... 75 minutes

Saranac Lake to Boston ... 100 minutes

St. Louis to Owensboro ... 69 minutes

Sidney to Billings ... 96 minutes

I'd would hate to build a business model strictly on EAS routes should congress decide to start whittling them away. Granted CAPE AIR has survived under the model, will the model exists in a couple of years ?

CS-23- Tecnam P2012 Traveller


From my seat, nothing beats those PT6 engines in this class of aircraft

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hNatfVBmKIE
Reply
Old 08-13-2018 | 08:04 AM
  #1888  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Captain AJ
Glendive to Billings ... 80 minutes



Havre to Billings ... 75 minutes



Saranac Lake to Boston ... 100 minutes



St. Louis to Owensboro ... 69 minutes



Sidney to Billings ... 96 minutes



I'd would hate to build a business model strictly on EAS routes should congress decide to start whittling them away. Granted CAPE AIR has survived under the model, will the model exists in a couple of years ?



CS-23- Tecnam P2012 Traveller





From my seat, nothing beats those PT6 engines in this class of aircraft



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hNatfVBmKIE


Many routes are much shorter, and many routes are non eas. Turbine engines cost far more to operate especially on shorter routes, as much of maintenance is driven by cycles not hours... Cape exists in part by being able to be cheaper than turbine operations. There are plenty of turbine competitors already.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 08-13-2018 | 08:05 AM
  #1889  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Captain AJ
Glendive to Billings ... 80 minutes

Havre to Billings ... 75 minutes

Saranac Lake to Boston ... 100 minutes

St. Louis to Owensboro ... 69 minutes

Sidney to Billings ... 96 minutes

I'd would hate to build a business model strictly on EAS routes should congress decide to start whittling them away. Granted CAPE AIR has survived under the model, will the model exists in a couple of years ?

CS-23- Tecnam P2012 Traveller


From my seat, nothing beats those PT6 engines in this class of aircraft

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hNatfVBmKIE
Many routes are much shorter, and many routes are non EAS. Turbine engines cost far more to operate especially on shorter routes, as much of maintenance is driven by cycles not hours... Cape exists in part by being able to be cheaper than turbine operations. There are plenty of turbine competitors already.
Reply
Old 08-13-2018 | 08:40 AM
  #1890  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 406
Likes: 3
From: Dream Job
Default

Originally Posted by Captain AJ
Glendive to Billings ... 80 minutes

Havre to Billings ... 75 minutes

Saranac Lake to Boston ... 100 minutes

St. Louis to Owensboro ... 69 minutes

Sidney to Billings ... 96 minutes

I'd would hate to build a business model strictly on EAS routes should congress decide to start whittling them away. Granted CAPE AIR has survived under the model, will the model exists in a couple of years ?

CS-23- Tecnam P2012 Traveller


From my seat, nothing beats those PT6 engines in this class of aircraft

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hNatfVBmKIE
I flew 2 of those routes so I know they have longer routes but the majority of them are short. Like you said, it wouldn't make much sense to rebuild their fleet based on eas routes.

Sent from my BTV-W09 using Tapatalk
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
freightdog
Regional
64
12-03-2009 02:17 PM
1515greenlight
Regional
5
04-08-2009 01:37 PM
cencal83406
Regional
17
02-03-2009 07:19 PM
Ozpilot414
Regional
1
01-05-2009 12:37 PM
zephyr
Part 135
68
09-21-2008 12:03 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices