![]() |
Originally Posted by Otterbox
(Post 2668442)
The pilot group went into the vote knowing that a NO vote would not bring a restart to negotiations. It was a take it or leave it deal.
Expect an uptick in attrition as reality sets in for the folks who stuck around to in the hopes for pay and QOL improvements from this TA and they decide to leave. |
Originally Posted by CharlieFoxtrot
(Post 2668501)
I honestly don't think anything is going to change. The status quo will continue on as normal. People talk a lot on the line and complain, but little doggies can bark all day long however if there is no bite then the company won't care. I really don't see attrition increasing as a result of the "no" vote. Most pilots here are sold on the idea of "I'll just deal with all the PDT shinanigans until I flow" mentality. The only way I see it getting better for the pilot group is if PDT is unable to fill new hire classes and if the current pilot group stops picking up all the open flying. Money talks, if PDT is forced to cancel flights due to not having crews then that will set off alarms higher up that something needs to change. But if all the open time continues to be picked up then why would management care about us at all? I.e. status quo as usual. Just my 2 cents for what it's worth.
We will see next week the size of the nh class this month.. but recruiting is scrambling... word is out... piedmont is not the place to come to.. unless you live in base... don't want too fluffy much for first year... approximately 100 hours in the first year.. and you don't mind only 11 to 14 days in your bed. |
Originally Posted by CharlieFoxtrot
(Post 2668501)
I honestly don't think anything is going to change. The status quo will continue on as normal. People talk a lot on the line and complain, but little doggies can bark all day long however if there is no bite then the company won't care. I really don't see attrition increasing as a result of the "no" vote. Most pilots here are sold on the idea of "I'll just deal with all the PDT shinanigans until I flow" mentality. The only way I see it getting better for the pilot group is if PDT is unable to fill new hire classes and if the current pilot group stops picking up all the open flying. Money talks, if PDT is forced to cancel flights due to not having crews then that will set off alarms higher up that something needs to change. But if all the open time continues to be picked up then why would management care about us at all? I.e. status quo as usual. Just my 2 cents for what it's worth.
|
I see a merger with Envoy sooner rather then later.
|
Originally Posted by skytrails
(Post 2668604)
I see a merger with Envoy sooner rather then later.
|
Piedmont can’t run their operation. Thus they’ll just transfer Piedmont’s only asset (pilots) to Envoy to help staffing over there going forward. Then if they still want 3 WO’s to whipsaw they’ll go buy mesa.
|
Originally Posted by skytrails
(Post 2668604)
I see a merger with Envoy sooner rather then later.
|
What’s the MX write up issue? On the flaps 45? Haven’t flown the plane in a long time and I’m forgetting what the speeds were!
|
Flaps 45 speed is 145. Vapp is often very near that speed. Now I guess the company wants any over speed to be written up. I guess it used to be you could exceed the speed momentarily with no harm no foul.
|
You guys think merger, but I think a long winded shutdown is more likely with some soft landings program at envoy.
There’s significant savings by keeping the majority of the seniority pools at both airlines under 6 years old, a merger might bring that number up a few years. Coming to Piedmont is very risky in both the short term and long term, relatively speaking in comparison to PSA and ENY. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:44 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands