DEC into the E175?
#51
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,477
Likes: 289
From: 737 FO
Lol. As opposed to every other carrier without a training bond.
#52
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 1,729
Likes: 0
Has more to do with being a check airman than than a type rating.
Last edited by havick206; 03-08-2019 at 05:53 PM.
#54
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 832
Likes: 0
Well yeah, you still need the 1000 TPIC, but I think the 1000 TPIC in an E175 is more valuable than the same in a E145 or CRJ because the carriers I mentioned already fly them and you'd be typed already.
#57
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 832
Likes: 0
Big signing bonus + industry low pay is < or = (for the first year) a small or no signing bonus + higher pay.
After the first year, the pay gap is substantial.
#58
As a matter of fact I could argue that a 200 captain has more experienced than a 175 captain, it’s definitely a bigger challenge. The airlines want someone who has decision making experience, knowing when not to go, dealing with the changing environment - airlines as a whole could care less about wing mounted turbine time.
Just because you are typed in an airplane doesn’t mean your not going through the same training program as everyone else at intial. I give you this, you know where the engine start switch is already and you might be easier to train systems and handling to. But that won’t be then difference between choosing you for the job over another candidate.
Hell you could be harder to train because you already do it “X” and the new airline wants it done “Y”.
#59
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 832
Likes: 0
The majors do not care what type the TPIC came from, they care about you being a 121 captain and the responsibility that comes with.
As a matter of fact I could argue that a 200 captain has more experienced than a 175 captain, it’s definitely a bigger challenge. The airlines want someone who has decision making experience, knowing when not to go, dealing with the changing environment - airlines as a whole could care less about wing mounted turbine time.
Just because you are typed in an airplane doesn’t mean your not going through the same training program as everyone else at intial. I give you this, you know where the engine start switch is already and you might be easier to train systems and handling to. But that won’t be then difference between choosing you for the job over another candidate.
Hell you could be harder to train because you already do it “X” and the new airline wants it done “Y”.
As a matter of fact I could argue that a 200 captain has more experienced than a 175 captain, it’s definitely a bigger challenge. The airlines want someone who has decision making experience, knowing when not to go, dealing with the changing environment - airlines as a whole could care less about wing mounted turbine time.
Just because you are typed in an airplane doesn’t mean your not going through the same training program as everyone else at intial. I give you this, you know where the engine start switch is already and you might be easier to train systems and handling to. But that won’t be then difference between choosing you for the job over another candidate.
Hell you could be harder to train because you already do it “X” and the new airline wants it done “Y”.
Like I said, I was just repeating what someone said on another thread and it kind of made sense.
#60
On Reserve
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
I guess you could probably argue they want a 175 guy because they already flew the airplane so they (maybe) have a marginally higher chance of passing training than someone that flew a CRJ or 145, but then again we are talking about legacy and major flight times here, where mostly everyone already probably has thousands of hours in jets anyway. I still think they would much rather value somebodies resume and background more than they would value a 175 type rating.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



