![]() |
Originally Posted by UnitedExpress
(Post 3096057)
United has an earnings and conference call tomorrow and will likely explain who will operate what after 9/30.
|
Originally Posted by tallpilot
(Post 3096066)
I think it's too soon for that. I don't believe Kirby has given up on scope relief. Once he finally capitulates (or TI does, but that isn't my bet) then you will see the plan for UAX. Revenue share for EAS sounds right. Not sure about anything else.
|
Originally Posted by tallpilot
(Post 3096066)
I think it's too soon for that. I don't believe Kirby has given up on scope relief. Once he finally capitulates (or TI does, but that isn't my bet) then you will see the plan for UAX. Revenue share for EAS sounds right. Not sure about anything else.
|
So both 145 operators are wanting to send every last employee a WARN notice. Seems like they are preparing for an outcome far worse than other regionals. Am I wrong?
|
Originally Posted by Happyflyer
(Post 3096584)
At this point any scope relief or even status quo grace would include United pilots.
Originally Posted by GA2Jets
(Post 3096739)
So both 145 operators are wanting to send every last employee a WARN notice. Seems like they are preparing for an outcome far worse than other regionals. Am I wrong?
|
[QUOTE=tallpilot;3096785]Correct. Perhaps a grand bargain is possible that maintains competitiveness and protects United jobs. I can’t see how though.
Hard to read anything good in it. Too bad, the XR is more capable and more comfortable than the 200. Seems like a good choice in a low demand environment but other factors are at play.[/QUOTE More capable from a Perfomance standpoint yes .More comfortable? I don’t know they both suck , cockpit and cabin . I’ve flown both . |
[QUOTE=idlethrust;3097021]
Originally Posted by tallpilot
(Post 3096785)
Correct. Perhaps a grand bargain is possible that maintains competitiveness and protects United jobs. I can’t see how though.
Hard to read anything good in it. Too bad, the XR is more capable and more comfortable than the 200. Seems like a good choice in a low demand environment but other factors are at play.[/QUOTE More capable from a Perfomance standpoint yes .More comfortable? I don’t know they both suck , cockpit and cabin . I’ve flown both . |
[QUOTE=tallpilot;3097057]
Originally Posted by idlethrust
(Post 3097021)
They do, compared to the 170 and other 'real cabin' small jets, but not compared to the DHC-8s and Saab 340s they replaced. The stretch CRJs are pretty uncomfortable as well. But if we're talking about 50 seaters I'll take the 145 over the 200 any day, for cabin comfort, performance and the avionics. I actually don’t mind the 145 as a passenger. That could be because I fly it, but there’s plenty of leg room in A and B, C is a little crammed but a window seat. |
[QUOTE=tallpilot;3097057]
Originally Posted by idlethrust
(Post 3097021)
They do, compared to the 170 and other 'real cabin' small jets, but not compared to the DHC-8s and Saab 340s they replaced. The stretch CRJs are pretty uncomfortable as well. But if we're talking about 50 seaters I'll take the 145 over the 200 any day, for cabin comfort, performance and the avionics. |
Originally Posted by tallpilot
(Post 3096785)
Correct. Perhaps a grand bargain is possible that maintains competitiveness and protects United jobs. I can’t see how though.
Hard to read anything good in it. Too bad, the XR is more capable and more comfortable than the 200. Seems like a good choice in a low demand environment but other factors are at play. United ALPA needs to get involved XJT is the most viable option for their furloughs with 175 approval. XJT pilots need to consider what type of seniority bath is acceptable for a possible furloughed United seniority number, vs total cease of operations. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:40 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands