Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
What do you think the industry will look like in 5 years? >

What do you think the industry will look like in 5 years?

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

What do you think the industry will look like in 5 years?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-30-2013 | 09:34 PM
  #61  
Yazzoo's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 282
Likes: 2
From: 747
Default

Originally Posted by Packrat
It sounds good that DAL is hiring 600 pilots next year. How many apps? 10,000? That's a 6% shot.

UCAL/AA the same number? That's an 18% shot.
Don't mean to nitpick...but it's still only a 6% shot at getting hired by a major so we're even more screwed!
Reply
Old 12-30-2013 | 10:27 PM
  #62  
mike734's Avatar
New boss = Old boss
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,763
Likes: 1
From: Ca B737
Default

Originally Posted by Wheels up
1. Industry 25% smaller. UAL and US Airways will fail, but not before AA and maybe CAL go Chapter 11. AA will have massive layoffs in the Fall and will declare BK in the winter and impose a draconian contract on employees. Many of the AA leadership will leave with fat bonuses prior to BK.The DAL/NWA merger will go badly and result in parking of a large number of airplanes and large numbers of layoffs with Anderson saying "It's not the merger, it's the economy."
2. Bad recession and inflation in the US economy. Europe and Asia will follow.
3. Little to no air service at smaller airports.
4. Very few sub-100 seat airplanes.
5. Companies, aided by the government and courts, will dumb-down the profession even more.
6. The gubment will sell-out to foreigners and allow majority ownership of US carriers as well as open sky rights.
7. Commuter companies will go away and mainline will pickup that flying. However, the unions will be emasculated by the companies, government, and court system and will be working for commuter wages anyway.
8. Senior mainline pilots will sell-out junior pilots in a vain attempt to hold onto their compensation a little long. In the long run, it won't work and you'll see the pilot profession basically a truck driver status job.
9. Obama and the democrats will be running the government, but will gladly screw over the airline unions in favor of keeping tickets as cheap as practical. Obama will continue to ride-the-tiger in Iraq and Afganistan.
Wow. Just wow. Can you please enlighten us with some more predictions Wheels up? Your insight is amazing!
Reply
Old 12-31-2013 | 03:53 AM
  #63  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
From: 767 CA
Default

Originally Posted by mike734
Wow. Just wow. Can you please enlighten us with some more predictions Wheels up? Your insight is amazing!
Oh snap!!!!
Reply
Old 12-31-2013 | 09:20 AM
  #64  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,459
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by The Duke
On a more serious note, folks should check out the all-new A400 from Airbus...4 engine t-prop, extremely efficient, capable of .70 mach, way up in the flightlevels (FL370 I believe). I'm not a huge airbus fan, but this seems like an uber-capable aircraft that burns a heckuva lot less fuel than a jet. Maybe we'll see these in our skies, or something similar, to offset fuel costs.

Seems like a sweet plane.

Airbus A400M Military Transport Aircraft – Air Military Transport at its Finest - Airbus A400M
Careful Duke, your 'Dashy' ways are showing through
Reply
Old 12-31-2013 | 09:27 AM
  #65  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,459
Likes: 0
Default !

Originally Posted by The Duke
I'm not in favor of a single-pilot flightdeck for the reasons you've all specified. Personally, I love flying w/ someone else, usually makes the job a lot of fun and less stressful. My only concern is that advancements that we're seeing w/ the military, specifically drone aircraft, will eventually find their way to the flightdecks of commercial airlines. Wasn't GPS started by our military...now we're using GPS. The military gave us the internet (Sorry Al), now we're using the internet.

It's just a hypothetical, but if the military can now launch remotely controlled 24 hr. drone missions in the middle-east, wouldn't it be possible to apply this to commercial aviation? Cost may dictate that this is at least considered/tried in order to allow for much of the American public to continue to afford commercial flying. Again, I'm opposed to the idea, but don't think for a second that there are others who have not given all of this some serious thought.
Yes! What about a single pilot airliner that is also tied into a remote 'drone type' operating system on the ground. A dispatcher/remote pilot will collaborate with the airborne crew-member and in an emergency take control remotely with drone technology. That gives back an element of redundancy. This remote dispatcher/pilot can monitor several airborne flights at once that have staggered departure/arrival times thereby eliminating the payroll costs of say 5 Co-pilots. Or worse, the remote ground operator IS the Captain, and the airborne pilot is the FO.
Reply
Old 12-31-2013 | 11:41 AM
  #66  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,809
Likes: 0
From: Left
Default

Originally Posted by galaxy flyer
And, thus, we have the problem of too many pilots chasing too few jobs. The 10,000 app answer was the same in 1984, "we have to get hired, they'll run out of pilots". No matter how you slice it, a thin minority, 15% at most, will get mainline legacy jobs. Look who is getting hired now--flows and ex-mil guys with beaucoup squares filled--SQ DO, safety, IP/SEFEs. I've been around since the '70s, it's a small group that gets hired at majors, the rest fly at regionals, corporates, freight ( not FDX, UPS, either).

GF
Did you even read the rest of what was said? The theory here is that every major/lcc/etc have THE SAME 10k apps on file. Of course that theory is not perfect but even if there isn't quite that much overlap maybe its 15k apps total....or even 20k.

Now it is not theory but FACT that there are 18k major retirements in the next decadeish. There are only about 20k regional pilots(Probably about 20% of which are lifers). Obviously that is not the only pool but again, even if you add 50% to that for 135/91/military thats 30k pilots....for almost 20k positions. The odds aren't all that bad.
Reply
Old 12-31-2013 | 12:09 PM
  #67  
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 4,378
Likes: 0
From: 7th green
Default

Originally Posted by galaxy flyer
...a thin minority, 15% at most, will get mainline legacy jobs. Look who is getting hired now--flows and ex-mil guys with beaucoup squares filled--SQ DO, safety, IP/SEFEs. I've been around since the '70s, it's a small group that gets hired at majors, the rest fly at regionals, corporates, freight...
Exactly my point. Everyone thinks THEY will be the 777 Mainline CA laying over in Rome. In fact, only a FEW Mainline pilots will ever see a widebody left seat.

Many more will never have the seniority to upgrade and/or stay in a narrowbody for QOL reasons.

That doesn't even scratch the surface of all the folks who will never get out of their RJ.

Airline piloting is a pyramid and not everyone will reach the pinnacle. In fact, many times more will end up flying for Pinnacle. Go for the gusto, but realize there are thousands more applicants than jobs.
Reply
Old 12-31-2013 | 12:14 PM
  #68  
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 4,378
Likes: 0
From: 7th green
Default

Originally Posted by pagey
Now it is not theory but FACT that there are 18k major retirements in the next decadeish. There are only about 20k regional pilots(Probably about 20% of which are lifers). Obviously that is not the only pool but again, even if you add 50% to that for 135/91/military thats 30k pilots....for almost 20k positions. The odds aren't all that bad.
Your numbers are fuzzy. Where did you get 18K retirements in the next 10 years? You're also assuming that no more airlines go out of business, there is no hiccup in the economy, fuel prices remain stable, a whole plethora of variables.

Remember 2001? How many guys got furloughed? How many guys saw their upgrade go from 6 to 12-15 years?

What happens if the age rule goes to 67? 70?

Sorry to pop your fantasy balloon. Congrats to people who do get hired. Those of you who don't...try not to be too bitter.
Reply
Old 12-31-2013 | 12:56 PM
  #69  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,809
Likes: 0
From: Left
Default

Originally Posted by Packrat
Your numbers are fuzzy. Where did you get 18K retirements in the next 10 years? You're also assuming that no more airlines go out of business, there is no hiccup in the economy, fuel prices remain stable, a whole plethora of variables.

Remember 2001? How many guys got furloughed? How many guys saw their upgrade go from 6 to 12-15 years?

What happens if the age rule goes to 67? 70?

Sorry to pop your fantasy balloon. Congrats to people who do get hired. Those of you who don't...try not to be too bitter.
And why is it ok for you to forecast doom and gloom but not ok for anyone to forecast optimism?

This thread is direct proof that everyone on this website(myself included) is blatantly clueless about what will actually happen. Why is your scenario more probable than mine?

U.S. Airline Pilot Retirements

Those numbers are a little old but if someone was going to turn 65 in 2021 before they still are now.

I'll save you the trouble of clicking on it. It says that by 2024 19,000 pilots will retire from major airlines.
Reply
Old 12-31-2013 | 06:21 PM
  #70  
ZBowFlyz's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
From: Left
Default

I predict Lakes will be flying 737-200's single pilot with little "Inop" stickers on the seats.... on an EAS route to Valentine, Nebraska... 3 times a day
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SWAjet
Major
14
11-29-2014 05:31 PM
SWAjet
Major
6
12-30-2009 03:27 AM
soldierboy
Regional
189
06-22-2008 08:26 AM
texaspilot76
Part 135
22
11-27-2007 12:09 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
02-26-2005 09:46 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices