Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

PDT News and Rumors

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-28-2014 | 06:31 AM
  #5291  
BSOuthisplace's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 637
Likes: 0
From: N/A
Default

Originally Posted by skyxbomb
Both PSA and PDT's TA is an insult! However AA kept their end by adding aircraft to PSA and have guarantee of 30 aircraft. PDT is offered no growth but rather a wind down of operation where AA will keep only 20 aircraft in operation at a loss of course to ensure the lifers a retirement. Correct me if I'm interpreting this wrong. In case AA wants to grow PDT, you will be capped with no grandfathering for the senior pilots over 12 years of longevity. But given the situation PDT is in, AA offered just enough to get the vote passed. PSA and PDT are easy to shut down. Hence why PSA reluctantly passed the TA which nobody else understands. Envoy is a whole different animal due to their sheer size. And yet they're getting punished as well but time will tell. Majors would rather fly 190s and 717s on their own than to ever see a regional captain make 120-130 and FOs making 50-60k. Look at Delta, that's exactly what they're doing. And in a way it's better for the whole industry.
I agree, the aircraft commitment language is not as solid as PSAs, but like I said if they don't deliver aircraft nothing changes other than we keep the flow.

There is aircraft commitment language in this TA. My understanding reading the LOA is the only way AAG can back out of delivering 175s is if either AFA or IAM refuse to negotiate new contracts.

There is grandfathering language for Dash-8s up to the 25 year step
Reply
Old 08-28-2014 | 06:38 AM
  #5292  
dash8's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
From: rabble rouser
Default

the ignorance and misinformation in this thread is astounding...

there are grandfather clauses
there is a section detailing that the last 20 of the standing order of 175s are slated for pdt, as are the first 20 options (if AA exercises the order options)

it would take aag 120 days to close us down and transfer the majority of our flying to existing contract carriers (with the exception of a tiny handful of routes that would disappear) and they would most certainly do it as it would let them really put the screws to eagle(sorry, they're never going to be 'envoy' to me)
Reply
Old 08-28-2014 | 06:43 AM
  #5293  
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
From: A320 F/O
Default

If I read the flow through language correctly, AA only has to make 3 offers (up to 350 pilots) a month. An offer is just that, an offer, if the pilot turns it down, it still counts as an offer. Thus with the proclaimed 100+ lifers on property, PDT would see zero go to the flow for almost 3 years.

That being said, quick calculations show the most senior F/O on property wouldn't see indoc at AAG for almost 5 years! Pilot #350 would take 9.5 years to flow. That is insane. The "flow" isn't really worth much IMO.
Reply
Old 08-28-2014 | 06:45 AM
  #5294  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Default

Stand strong and hold the line. By signing this you'll give them leverage and be sorry later. Don't. You don't want to make the same mistake as Pinnacle or PSA. You won't be shut down, they need every single one of you.
Reply
Old 08-28-2014 | 07:09 AM
  #5295  
dash8's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
From: rabble rouser
Default

Originally Posted by inline five
If I read the flow through language correctly, AA only has to make 3 offers (up to 350 pilots) a month. An offer is just that, an offer, if the pilot turns it down, it still counts as an offer. Thus with the proclaimed 100+ lifers on property, PDT would see zero go to the flow for almost 3 years.

That being said, quick calculations show the most senior F/O on property wouldn't see indoc at AAG for almost 5 years! Pilot #350 would take 9.5 years to flow. That is insane. The "flow" isn't really worth much IMO.
if they're lifers then they wont have their opt in set and they wouldn't get called anyways

the rest of your math is woefully incorrect...
Reply
Old 08-28-2014 | 07:13 AM
  #5296  
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
From: A320 F/O
Default

Originally Posted by dash8
if they're lifers then they wont have their opt in set and they wouldn't get called anyways

the rest of your math is woefully incorrect...
I believe by reading the TA you must "opt out", isn't that correct? (EDIT: See below) I don't know many people who would completely shut the door. Why not keep all options open? You get no benefit by saying "no thanks" before they even get to you.

How is it incorrect? Take 3 (offers) per month and divide it by your seniority number. There is an increase of one additional per pilot every 125 pilots on property, but that assumes the same relative pilot group size.

EDIT: Here is the language:

Not later than sixty (60) days from the date of signing of this Letter of Agreement, Piedmont will publish and maintain a website on which each Piedmont pilot may affirmatively state on a standing basis that he or she is willing to accept an opportunity for a pilot position at AA offered under the PFP.
Key word is "may". It's not required to do.
Reply
Old 08-28-2014 | 07:22 AM
  #5297  
Lvlng4Spd's Avatar
Happy at PDT
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 983
Likes: 0
From: EMB-145 CA
Default

Not to mention if we get the 40 E-jets, we grow. For each additional 125 pilots added the flow goes up by 1 per month. At minimum, upgrade time decreases by half or more. Add in retirements and folks riding out the dash and 2 to 3 year upgrade would be commonplace and it would likely be lower than that. Flow also not likely to be minimum levels in a few years. Yeah I know, economy, world events, blah blah. I could also be hit by a meteor today, but it's a beautiful day and I'm going outside.
Reply
Old 08-28-2014 | 08:17 AM
  #5298  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 843
Likes: 0
From: DHC-8 100/300
Default

Originally Posted by inline five
If I read the flow through language correctly, AA only has to make 3 offers (up to 350 pilots) a month. An offer is just that, an offer, if the pilot turns it down, it still counts as an offer. Thus with the proclaimed 100+ lifers on property, PDT would see zero go to the flow for almost 3 years.

That being said, quick calculations show the most senior F/O on property wouldn't see indoc at AAG for almost 5 years! Pilot #350 would take 9.5 years to flow. That is insane. The "flow" isn't really worth much IMO.
Wrong. You opt in. They only offer to pilots that opt in.
Reply
Old 08-28-2014 | 08:21 AM
  #5299  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
Default

No shortage of hypocrites here.

Last edited by flyviper; 08-28-2014 at 08:32 AM.
Reply
Old 08-28-2014 | 08:34 AM
  #5300  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
Default

If you or anyone didn't have to depend on PDT for a paycheck, how would you vote? This is precisely why everyone should have a viable plan B. It's only prudent. Good luck to everyone.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
aviator01
Horizon Air
47
06-24-2008 11:56 AM
triflyier
Cargo
28
05-02-2008 05:26 AM
tankerpuke
Cargo
2
09-23-2007 08:37 AM
Freighter Captain
Hiring News
3
05-16-2005 12:45 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices